Integrity Matters

Directions Website Contact the organization

Integrity Matters Passionate about integrity, character and values. We welcome people of all flavors.

πŸ—³οΈ The Integrity Matters El Paso County Commissioner Voter Guide is out: Districts 1 and 5.  Please share so everyone ha...
10/12/2026

πŸ—³οΈ The Integrity Matters El Paso County Commissioner Voter Guide is out: Districts 1 and 5. Please share so everyone has an opportunity to be an informed voter.

El Paso County votes November 3. The Commissioners you elect decide land use, water, roads, growth, and how your tax dollars are spent across the county.

We asked all five D1 and D5 candidates the same hard questions. Two answered. Three did not. Read their answers in their own words, and see who chose not to respond.

We also follow the money. Our campaign finance summary shows each candidate’s total donations and how much came from developer and other special-interest sources, drawn from their state TRACER filings.

β€œSunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” β€” Justice Louis Brandeis

πŸ“Š NEW: CommissionWatch. Every El Paso County Commission vote, on the record and searchable, with the Screw-O-Meter tracking how often each commissioner, and the Commission as a whole, votes against residents. Nonpartisan. No endorsements. Just the record.

Subscription proceeds support the Integrity Matters Citizens Defense Fund, which pays for independent expert studies, public records enforcement, and legal defense. When residents need help, they shouldn’t have to stop and raise money first. The fund is already there: https://www.civicprinciples.com/el-paso/

Be an informed voter: https://www.integritymatterscos.org/2026-county-commissioner-surveys

Paid for by Integrity Matters. Registered Agent: Dana Duggan

Integrity Matters is a nonprofit corporation which helps citizens hold leadership to account.

Palmer Lake votes November 3. Do you know where your candidates stand?  πŸ—³οΈ The Integrity Matters Palmer Lake Voter Guide...
10/11/2026

Palmer Lake votes November 3. Do you know where your candidates stand?

πŸ—³οΈ The Integrity Matters Palmer Lake Voter Guide is out.

Palmer Lake votes November 3. We asked all 12 candidates for Mayor and Trustee the same hard questions on water, fire consolidation, the Master Plan, Buc-ee’s, data centers, town finances, open records, and ethics. Six answered. Six did not. Read every answer, in the candidates’ own words: https://www.integritymatterscos.org/2026-palmer-lake-election

β€œSunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” β€” Justice Louis Brandeis

Last year, Palmer Lake posted campaign finance reports online. This year, the Town Clerk decided voters must go to Town Hall to see who is funding each campaign. Monument posts its reports online, and county and state candidates across Colorado file in TRACER, where reports are public as soon as they are filed. Integrity Matters has objected to the Board of Trustees, the Town Administrator, and the Town Attorney. Add your voice.

Email the Town and ask it to restore online access to campaign finance reports. Copy and paste:

To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

πŸ“Š NEW: CommissionWatch. Every El Paso County Commission vote, on the record and searchable, with the Screw-O-Meter tracking how often each commissioner, and the Commission as a whole, votes against residents. Nonpartisan. No endorsements. Just the record.

Subscription proceeds support the Integrity Matters Citizens Defense Fund, which pays for independent expert studies, public records enforcement, and legal defense. When residents need help, they shouldn’t have to stop and raise money first. The fund is already there: https://www.civicprinciples.com/el-paso/

Be an informed voter.

Paid for by Integrity Matters. Registered Agent: Dana Duggan

All candidates were email several times, and, at the request of several candidates, we extended the timeline by an additional week.Β  We are not surprised when candidates object to our surveys as they are notoriously challenging questions about the tough issues facing a community.Β  We believe that ...

πŸ—³οΈ MEET THE PALMER LAKE CANDIDATESPalmer Lake residents will soon choose a mayor and trustees who will make important de...
09/16/2026

πŸ—³οΈ MEET THE PALMER LAKE CANDIDATES

Palmer Lake residents will soon choose a mayor and trustees who will make important decisions affecting the town’s future. Integrity Matters encourages every voter to attend, hear directly from the candidates, and ask questions about the issues that matter to you.

πŸ“… Saturday, September 19, 2026
⏰ 4:00–7:00 p.m.
πŸ“ EcoSpa Annex, 350 Highway 105

Candidates for Mayor

β€’ Kent Hutson
β€’ Atis Jurka

Candidates for Trustee β€” in ballot order

β€’ William Bass
β€’ Beth Harris
β€’ Tony Beltran
β€’ Dennis Stern
β€’ Rebecca β€œBecky” Albright
β€’ Karla Kerstner
β€’ Roger Moseley
β€’ Kathy Keeley
β€’ John Marble
β€’ Eric Alan Burton

Event Schedule

β€’ 4:00–4:15: Welcome and introduction
β€’ 4:15–5:00: Three-minute candidate elevator pitches
β€’ 5:00–5:45: Standard questionsβ€”the same question will be asked of every candidate
β€’ 5:45–6:30: Citizen questions for individual candidates
β€’ 6:30–7:00: Meet and greet, if time permits

All candidates are being invited. Campaign-material tables will be available, refreshments may be provided, media will be invited, and audio/video recording is being evaluated.

Integrity Matters will also be publishing responses to our Palmer Lake candidate surveys soon, giving voters another opportunity to compare where the candidates stand on transparency, responsible growth, public safety, property rights, water, ethical government, and Palmer Lake’s future.

Local elections matter.

Your community. Your future. Your vote.

A WHOLE LOTTA BULLOur newsletter went out this morning, and there's a lot in it. But we want to point you at one section...
09/15/2026

A WHOLE LOTTA BULL

Our newsletter went out this morning, and there's a lot in it. But we want to point you at one section in particular.

On Saturday the Gazette published a guest opinion by former Councilman Tim Leigh headed "Data center poses few environmental issues." He opened by telling the circus to stay home, and dismissing "clowns," "paid agitators, purple hair" and "pot-smoking kids with nose rings."

Then he wrote this:

"The actual computer bank will be buried deep inside the building… The noise issue is a non-start."

The noise doesn't come from the computers. It comes from 72 chillers and 60 diesel generators standing outdoors β€” three and a half acres of machinery in the open air, 368 feet from the nearest bedroom window. It's on the plan the City stamped on 11 June. Anyone can look at it.

He also calls Ta**us "a microscaler measured in mere square feet." The square feet are 442,468 of them, at 100 megawatts. His comparison is a Denver Bronco next to a Ken doll. Literally, he says.

The Ken doll needs sixty diesel generators to get through a power cut.

We've responded to all of it β€” the scale, the noise, the bond, the money, the environment, and what his byline doesn't mention β€” with the documents behind every correction.

Read it here πŸ‘‰ https://mailchi.mp/61427d77d404/a-whole-lotta-bull-project-taurus-hearing-9172026-be-heard

Three things, and they take five minutes:

1. Email City Council. The letter is written for you in the newsletter. Copy, paste, send. [email protected], copy us for transparency as these emails tend to go missing. [email protected]

2. Be there Thursday. City Council hears the appeal 17 September, doors 8 a.m., hearing 9 a.m., Pikes Peak Center, 190 S. Cascade. Council counts the room.

3. Share this post. Most people in this city still don't know a 100-megawatt data center was approved by one planner's stamp with no hearing and no vote. Every share reaches someone who doesn't.

Want the newsletter? Click the button in the top left corner of the newsletter page to sign up.

Donations for legal action are needed. Every little bit helps. While we work for free, there are hard costs to cover, and we cannot do it without the help of the public. Donate here: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=ZJKL5FH46RJCY

Integrity is doing the right thing when no none is watching.

09/14/2026

TURN ON THE SOUND TO HEAR THE DATA CENTER NOISE.
πŸ“£ YOUR VOICES MATTER β€” AND THEY ARE BEING HEARD.

To everyone who has emailed, spoken up, shared information, donated, or told a neighbor about Project Ta**us: THANK YOU.

This community is stepping up, and that matters.

Now we need to keep going. PLEASE SHARE.

The video below is part of the message we are taking directly into the community on our mobile billboard. It illustrates a simple concern that deserves serious attention:

HIGH-TECH. LOW-FREQUENCY.
THE DATA STAYS. THE HUM TRAVELS.

A proposed 100 MW data center with 72 chillers and 60 generators deserves careful scrutiny before decisions are made that could affect surrounding neighborhoods, wildlife habitat, and the places Colorado Springs treasures.

We are especially grateful to the experts who have stepped forward to help the community understand what is at stake: Peter Wilson, Jamie Banks, and Dr. Jon Forshee. Thank you for lending your time, expertise, and voices to this effort.

But expert testimony costs money. So do legal challenges, ballot initiatives, recalls, public education, and the work required to answer developer-funded dark-money advertising with facts.

That is why all the proceeds from the incredible accountability tool, CouncilWatch, goes to the Neighborhood Defense Fund.

An educated public armed with a defense fund toward the fight: expert testimony, ballot initiatives, recall efforts, legal costs, public education, and responding to developer-funded dark-money campaigns. Even a small donation helps.

And Project Ta**us is also exactly why we need CouncilWatch.

SEE IT. SCORE IT. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE.

CouncilWatch is about making it easier for citizens to see how Colorado Springs City Council members actually voteβ€”not what a campaign mailer says, not what a developer-funded ad says, but the record.

This is our hope to take back control: www.councilwatchcos.org

Because developers shouldn't be able to buy influence while residents struggle just to be heard.

PLEASE DO THREE THINGS NOW:

πŸ“§ SEND AN EMAIL TODAY opposing Project Ta**us and asking City Council to protect the neighborhoods, wildlife, and public interests beyond the project's fence. https://www.integritymatterscos.org/stopprojecttaurusemail

πŸ›οΈ SHOW UP FOR THE HEARING. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17TH, 9AM, PIKES PEAK PERFORMANCE CENTER, 190 S Cascade Ave, Colorado Springs, CO 80903. A packed room sends a message that cannot be dismissed.

And please SHARE THIS VIDEO. Tag your neighbors. Send it to friends. Ask them to email and attend.

We may not have developers' money.

But we have something they can't buy: an informed, organized community willing to show up.

Thank you for stepping up. Thank you for refusing to be silent. And thank you for reminding our elected officials of something very important:

Our voices matter. Our neighborhoods matter. And our votes matter.

STOP PROJECT TA**US.
PROTECT WHAT'S BEYOND THE FENCE.

Hey, Kissing Camels. Your board isn't responding. Maybe you'll have better luck.Those are texts between Colorado Springs...
09/04/2026

Hey, Kissing Camels. Your board isn't responding. Maybe you'll have better luck.

Those are texts between Colorado Springs Utilities and Raeden, released under the Colorado Open Records Act to an impressive fourteen-year-old, Kyle McGuffey, who filed an open records request. Jason Green is the president of Raeden.

Read the second one. Forty-two megawatts firm by July. Another thirty by year-end. Another thirty contemplated. A hundred total. And on the other side, Raeden writing back about "pushing the 300MW" β€” pushed, in his telling, by CSU.

Dated January 21. Seven weeks before the application was even filed.

Now the rest of it. πŸ‘‡

JUNE 2 β€” The Chamber & EDC sends an email, marked high importance, arranging a meeting at the Kissing Camels Club for the next evening. It records that the HOA president agreed to it. It states, in capital letters, that the meeting is not open to the public or the media. Arranged in twenty-four hours. Try getting a tee time that fast.

JUNE 3 β€” Raeden presents to residents in that room. Nobody is there to answer it. Residents are told fifty megawatts.

JUNE 11 β€” The City approves Project Ta**us administratively. Eight days later with a stamp on a Mechanical Design page showing 100 MW, 36 chillers and 30 generators (2x what was publicly sold)

JULY 23 β€” A Planning Commission hearing running roughly twelve hours. Five appeals heard, denied 6–2, four conditions imposed. It is the entire reason there is an appeal before City Council. Kissing Camels residents have never been told this happened.

AUGUST 7 β€” The board writes to residents to say the hearing is coming, and that courts are reluctant to overturn elected officials, "especially a Home Rule City's." Thanks for the heads-up. Home rule has nothing to do with the standard of review, and this appeal isn't before a court. It's before Council. Council can reverse.

πŸ“„ AUGUST 26 β€” We email the board what was actually approved: 72 chillers, 60 diesel generators, two 50 MW data halls.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kzDj_ZozN2TtMaGpp9wx5E31imvzcCRQ/view?usp=sharing

πŸ“„ SEPTEMBER 3 β€” We sent testimony from Peter Wilson of the UK's Industrial Noise and Vibration Centre and Dr. Jamie Banks of Quiet Communities.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D1zCgOTLNEg9Fbx7KxwCQfY-DVK5bCF0/view?usp=sharing

πŸ“„ SEPTEMBER 4 β€” We send the texts above.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kq2FEe1u_87J45fix1RSJxD5BnD0KKrb/view?usp=sharing

Three emails. Two world experts. One set of texts. πŸ¦—πŸ¦—

Detailed information can be found on our website here: https://www.integritymatterscos.org/project-taurus-data-center

πŸ”΄ THE SPEAKING SLOTS FOR SUPPORTERS OF THE APPEAL/OPPONENTS OF RAEDEN SEPTEMBER 17 ARE ALMOST FULL AS OF TWO DAYS AGO. WRITING AND EMAIL TO COUNCIL IS THE ONLY WAY TO OBJECT NOW.

Written comment enters the record exactly the same as spoken testimony, and Council reads what lands in their inboxes. If you were planning to show up and speak β€” send it instead. Then come anyway. They count the room.

We have a sample email here that you can use or write your own if nothing more than a quick objection like the one below: https://www.integritymatterscos.org/stopprojecttaurusemail

πŸ“§ To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]

Subject: Public comment for the record β€” DEPN-26-0039 / APPL-26-0004, hearing September 17

Please enter this comment into the record for the Project Ta**us appeal.

I live in [neighborhood]. The plan the City approved shows 72 chillers and 60 diesel generators running continuously. Records released under CORA show Colorado Springs Utilities and Raeden discussing 100 megawatts by the end of this year and 300 megawatts beyond that β€” months before the public was told fifty. Two independent experts have submitted evidence that the noise study the City relied on does not measure the low-frequency sound this facility will produce, and that homes above the site are the most exposed.

I am asking Council to reverse the administrative approval.

πŸ’΅ AND IF YOU CAN GIVE, GIVE TODAY.

Expert witnesses cost money. Peter Wilson and Dr. Jamie Banks are two of the most credentialed people in the world on industrial noise, and their evidence is in this record because people paid for it. So is the legal work. Every dollar goes to the appeal.

DONATE HERE: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=ZJKL5FH46RJCY
Integrity Matters is a 501(c)(4). Contributions are not tax-deductible.

The families of Chelsea Glen sit 368 feet from this site. Theirs is the only neighborhood either noise study examined. And they have carried this entire fight β€” the fundraising, the records requests, the twelve-hour hearing β€” for themselves and for everyone above them. For the golf course. For the Club. For the Navigators. For every home in Kissing Camels that nobody modeled and nobody warned.

They did not ask for any of this and they have not flinched once. We have never seen a neighborhood work harder.

They should not be doing it alone.

More is coming this week.

Share this with your neighbors.

Feeling like the world & elected leaders have lost site of core values? That they make decisions without integrity and to better their own personal agenda? That they don't represent the values of the voters who elected them to office? We do too. Join us in standing for integrity in leadership.

KISSING CAMELS: WERE YOU TOLD?About 60% of Kissing Camels is within ONE MILE of the approved Project Ta**us chiller and ...
08/28/2026

KISSING CAMELS: WERE YOU TOLD?

About 60% of Kissing Camels is within ONE MILE of the approved Project Ta**us chiller and generator yards. All of Kissing Camels is within 1Β½ miles.

Yet Kissing Camels was not studied in either noise analysis.

And we're concerned about a pattern in what Kissing Camels residents haveβ€”and have notβ€”been told.

JUNE 3: Kissing Camels hosted Raeden's CEO at the Club for a private presentation. Records show the meeting was arranged through the Chamber & EDC in approximately 24 hours and expressly closed to the public and media. Residents heard directly from the applicant nine days before City approval.

JULY 23: The Planning Commission held an approximately 12-hour hearing on five appeals. The Commission voted 6–2 and imposed four conditions. Our subsequent letter to the Board noted that residents told us the newsletter following that hearing did not mention it.

AUGUST 26: Integrity Matters sent the Kissing Camels Board of Directors a detailed, documented letter about Project Ta**us and specifically asked that this information be shared with residents.

AUGUST 27: Kissing Camels held its Annual Meeting with record turnout.

Project Ta**us was not presented or discussed.

And we have received no response to our letter.

The applicant was given an opportunity to present its case to Kissing Camels residents.

We believe residents deserve to hear the concerns and see the evidence, too.

WHAT WASN'T STUDIED?

The approved plan shows 72 chillers and 60 diesel generators.

Neither noise analysis modeled that approved configuration. Neither studied the community north or west of the facility. The City's peer review used assessment points near residences on Chutney Street, south of the project.

Nobody modeled Kissing Camels.

And this isn't simply a question of whether you can "hear" something.

The applicant's own analysis calculated 41 dBA but 62 dBC from the chillers during normal operationβ€”a 21-decibel difference between the two measurements. Our letter explains why that raises serious questions about low-frequency sound that deserve examination.

The concerns extend beyond sound.

The materials we reviewed identified no habitat assessment, no thermal/heat-island study, no air-quality finding and no comparative-impact analysis in the project record. What about the impact to surrounding property values?

Sound. Human health. Wildlife. Environment. Property Values.

We believe Kissing Camels residents deserve answers to these questions before this project is operatingβ€”not afterward.

πŸ”Š HEAR DATA-CENTER NOISE FOR YOURSELF

Don't imagine what "data-center noise" means. Listen.

These are recordings from other facilities, not predictions of what Project Ta**us will sound like. Different facilities and equipment can produce different sound. But they demonstrate why we're asking for a serious examination of low-frequency noise.

14 MW data center near Rockrimmon / Ute Valley: https://youtu.be/lJPC2fVuZo8?si=cLVnOXuIsIdl87sl
Hear the 14 MW recording

46 MW Great Oak data center: https://youtu.be/9ByT2TU02DM?si=TWQVolgNE1YTx7Me
Hear the 46 MW recording

WE'RE BRINGING IN INDEPENDENT EXPERTISE

Integrity Matters is working with Quiet Communities, a national nonprofit founded by public-health and acoustics professionals.

Its president, Dr. Jamie Banks, chairs the Noise and Health Committee of the American Public Health Association. Its technical advisor, Peter Wilson, is technical director of the UK's Industrial Noise and Vibration Centre and designed aerodynamic fan-noise-control technology.

We urgently need to raise $7,000 for Quiet Communities' work on Project Ta**us before the September 17 City Council hearing.

70 people giving $100 gets us there.
140 people giving $50 gets us there.

They cannot start the work until we can assure them that we have the funds.

DONATE HERE: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=ZJKL5FH46RJCY

READ THE LETTER SENT TO YOUR BOARD: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jrmz30IqqUYfXNwq9gJK0neDMxFx0HJ8/view?usp=sharing

We don't want Kissing Camels residents to simply take our word for this.

Read the letter. Look at the map. Review the documents. Listen to the recordings. Ask questions. Decide for yourself.

We offered the Board material for its newsletter, offered to answer questions, and offered to provide the documents so residents could examine the information themselves.

We are still waiting for a response.

πŸ“… CITY COUNCIL HEARING β€” SEPTEMBER 17

Project Ta**us is under appeal. City Council can reverse the decision.

The City approved a 100 MW Data Center 368 feet from Colorado Springs homes without a public hearing. City Council decides the Appeal Septemer 17th, 2026. Read the record.

β›½ THEY CALLED IT A GAS STATION. JUST NOT TO US.Their engineers wrote to the Federal Highway Administration on May 28, 20...
08/21/2026

β›½ THEY CALLED IT A GAS STATION. JUST NOT TO US.

Their engineers wrote to the Federal Highway Administration on May 28, 2025:

"The primary development anticipated to affect the interchange is a 120-fueling position Buc-ee's gas station with a 74,000 square foot convenience store."

Gas stations are not allowed in C-1. That's why they're not calling it one here.

At page 5 of their application to El Paso County, they say the proposal "does not meet the Code definition of a Gas Station."

The letter calling it a gas station is at page 228 of that same application.

Same document. 223 pages apart.

And here's what an El Paso County land use application makes you sign:

"I am fully aware that any misrepresentation of any information on this application may be grounds for denial or revocation."

Grounds for denial.

πŸ“ THEIR OWN ENGINEER DREW WHAT A REAL ONE LOOKS LIKE

When Kimley-Horn modelled a code-compliant store on this exact parcel, they drew 5,000 square feet and 16 fueling positions.

They're asking for 74,000 and 120.

Fifteen times the building. Seven and a half times the pumps. Same firm. Same land.

πŸ’§ AND WHAT DOES A "NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE STORE" NEED?

Two wells permitted in April β€” one authorized to 2,250 feet.
A 500,000-gallon water tank.
A chlorination building.
A booster pump station.
A sanitary sewer lift station.

Their 297-page application mentions gallons eleven times.
Four label the tank. Seven are the pot sizes of shrubs.

It never once says how much water the store will use. No demand figure. No fire flow. No well yield.

The only engineering estimate in the public record β€” prepared for the Town of Palmer Lake β€” is 37,300 gallons a day. Over a million gallons a month.

If you're on a well out there, that's your aquifer.

🚦 AND IT HAS ALREADY BEEN COUNTED

Mississippi's first Buc-ee's β€” same building. The Gulf Regional Planning Commission counted the cars coming off I-10:

27,000 vehicles over two weekdays. 41,000 over the following three-day weekend.

A 2021 study of that same area found about 10,000 a day on the entire road network.

The store alone pulls more traffic than every road around it carried before it existed. Harrison County rebuilt the interstate overpass from two lanes to five. A year later the backups still happen weekly.

πŸ“ AND IN COLORADO

The Johnstown Buc-ee's opened March 2024 β€” same prototype, the only one in this state. Reported incidents within two miles, matched twelve-month periods:

116 before. 215 the first year. 254 the second.

Total reported incidents on the LexisNexis Community Crime Map β€” traffic incidents and vandalism as well as theft. Not index crime, and we don't offer them as a crime statistic. They are what a corridor looks like when twenty thousand vehicles a day arrive in it.

⚠️ NOW THE PART THAT SHOULD MAKE YOU ANGRY

Had the County granted this administratively, future approvals for the site "would be handled administratively. No public notices would be issued, and no hearings would be held."

Those are the County's own words.

And the County's code lets only the property owner appeal an administrative determination. Residents have no standing at all. Buc-ee's does β€” and they appealed within a week.

The Public Hearing Participation page was created on August 10 β€” seventeen days before this hearing, on an appeal pending since July 2. Modified August 12. Modified again August 19.

Speakers here were traditionally allotted three minutes and permitted to give their time to a neighbor. On July 23, immediately before a quasi-judicial hearing, that became ninety seconds and no ceding. The page now says you "may be limited to one minute."

No slides. No signs. No applause. Six printed copies.

We have objected, in writing, to the Office of the County Attorney, and our objections are in the record for ADM264.

What we objected to: none of it comes from the Board's own adopted rules β€” Resolution No. 26-8, adopted January 13, 2026 β€” which expressly contemplates opposition comment after the applicant's rebuttal, and which directs each speaker to submit "charts, maps, or other demonstrative evidence" to the Clerk. The webpage restricts the very material the adopted rules assume the public will bring.

We asked the Board to state, on the record, the adopted authority for any procedure that departs from it.

A webpage is not the rules. The resolution is.

πŸ“§ SO SEND THE EMAIL. IT'S THE PART THEY CAN'T LIMIT.

The County has said outright that its decision cannot rest on how many people show up β€” only on evidence.

A hundred identical letters count as one. A hundred letters each carrying one person's own observation of that intersection is evidence. That's the part nobody else can write.

DEADLINE: NOON, WEDNESDAY AUGUST 26

πŸ‘‰ SAMPLE LETTER AND EVERY ADDRESS: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SRQiQDPTR16Dmy2RqQfIBe-gx0l5XhfqQHjTPJ80tMI/edit?usp=sharing

⚠️ Sent one earlier and got a bounce-back? It never arrived. The County has acknowledged the address was published incorrectly. Please send it again.

And register to speak, closes 9:00 a.m. Thursday. πŸ‘‰https://forms.cloud.microsoft/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=2_qwiDTPxEe56hOZY4lYIAeEik-3jPVJnqWnTWjLIOhURFdOQkJLQkhQRUpFSE8zUjBSN00wT0ZQVyQlQCN0PWcu

πŸ—“οΈ THURSDAY, AUGUST 27 Β· 9:00 A.M.
Centennial Hall, 200 S. Cascade Avenue

A full room looks different from an empty one.

And register to speak πŸ‘‰ β†’ REGISTER TO SPEAK: SIGN UP VIA THE PORTAL: https://forms.cloud.microsoft/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=2_qwiDTPxEe56hOZY4lYIAeEik-3jPVJnqWnTWjLIOhURFdOQkJLQkhQRUpFSE8zUjBSN00wT0ZQVyQlQCN0PWcu πŸ—“οΈ THURSDAY, AUGUST 27 Β· 9:00 A.M. Centennial Hall, 200 S. Cascade Avenue ...

🚨 THE CITY WROTE SIX STANDARDS FOR DATA CENTERS. THIS PROJECT FAILS ALL SIX.  Please share so we can spend less on educa...
08/19/2026

🚨 THE CITY WROTE SIX STANDARDS FOR DATA CENTERS. THIS PROJECT FAILS ALL SIX. Please share so we can spend less on educating the public. Thank you.

On August 14 the Mayor announced the Community-First Data Center Standards β€” written, his office says, because of the July 23 hearing on Project Ta**us.

Project Ta**us was approved on June 11.

Either those standards apply to it β€” or the City just announced protections that exempt the one project that caused them to be written.

❌ RATEPAYERS β€” The utility's own study says serving this site needs a new transformer at Rampart Substation. Who pays, and when it gets built, appear nowhere in the record.

❌ WATER β€” City Planning was told zero. Colorado Springs Utilities was told 310 to 467 gallons per minute.

❌ NEIGHBORHOODS β€” 72 chillers and 60 diesel generators, 368 feet from homes. Every study modelled 36 and 30. The City's own acoustic reviewer called the modelling software a "freebie" and wrote that without the data "a reviewer such as myself has no idea what they are doing."

❌ COMMUNITY STANDARDS β€” No comparative impact analysis. No heat-island study. No air quality finding. No fire or life-safety review.

❌ COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION β€” The realtors' flyer says 60 to 100 jobs. The City's own Rapid Response form says 20 β€” against a $700 million investment.

❌ THE PUBLIC'S VOICE β€” No hearing. No vote. No public notice. Approved by one planner's electronic stamp at 3:25 p.m.

⚑ AND IT WAS ALWAYS GOING TO BE FAST

On January 13, 2026 β€” two months before the application was filed β€” the City's Economic Development Division issued a printed certificate designating Project Ta**us "an official Rapid Response Project β€” qualified to receive expedited plan reviews."

Eighty-six days from application to approval.

πŸ›οΈ THIS IS NOT ONE PROJECT. IT IS A SYSTEM.

In February 2023, under then-Mayor John Suthers, City Council adopted RetoolCOS by an 8–1 vote. It rewrote the appeal process for the first time in nearly three decades β€” narrowing who may appeal a development plan to people who live within 1,000 feet, or within three miles and who had already commented during the process.

On July 23, one of the five appeals against Project Ta**us was rejected on exactly that basis.

Wayne Williams sat on that Council as an At-Large member and Board Chair of Colorado Springs Utilities. He is now the Mayor's Chief of Staff.

And it's happening in the County too. Buc-ee's asked El Paso County to classify a 53-acre travel center as a "convenience store" β€” which would have meant, in the County's own words, that all future approvals "would be handled administratively… No public notices would be issued, and no hearings would be held."

The Planning Director declined. Buc-ee's appealed. The County's code lets only the property owner appeal an administrative determination β€” residents have no standing at all. That hearing is August 27. Monument's Town Council voted unanimously to oppose it.

The pattern is identical: decisions moved out of public hearings, and the public given less time, fewer materials, and no real chance to present a case.

βš–οΈ SEPTEMBER 17 β€” AND WE ASKED FOR A DIFFERENT DATE

Our Chief Legal Counsel has a hearing that same day before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit β€” in a case challenging HB24-1107, which makes residents pay government attorney fees when they lose a Rule 106(a)(4) appeal, but does not make developers pay when residents win.

The City of Colorado Springs is a named party in that case. They knew.

A second appellant had a family medical conflict the same day.

The code allows one request for a new date. We asked. We were denied.

πŸ“§ SEND AN EMAIL. IT MATTERS MORE THAN YOU THINK.

The Pikes Peak Association of Realtors and the Chamber & EDC are both running campaigns asking their members to write in support.

Council counts what arrives. Members read the tally before the hearing and say the numbers out loud at the dais.

Sample letter and every address here πŸ‘‰https://www.integritymatterscos.org/stopprojecttaurusemail

πŸ’™ DONATE β€” WE ARE FUNDING REAL EXPERTS

We've partnered with Quiet Communities founder Jamie Banks and Peter Wilson, BSc, MSc, technical director of the UK's Industrial Noise & Vibration Centre β€” the engineer who designed award-winning fan noise control technology. Don't believe Data Centers are a noise and vibration problem with health ramifications? Listen to Peter and Jamie discuss the science: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeG0mz86RjM

This project is 72 fan-driven chillers.

Your donation funds independent research, expert testimony, legal action, and public education.

GIVE NOW πŸ‘‰ https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=ZJKL5FH46RJCY

πŸ“Š NINE GROUNDS. 171 COUNTS. Any one of them defeats this approval.

πŸ“„ The full record πŸ‘‰https://www.integritymatterscos.org/project-taurus-data-center
πŸ“„ Measured against all six standards πŸ‘‰ https://www.integritymatterscos.org/cos-data-center-standards

πŸ—“οΈ CITY COUNCIL DECIDES SEPTEMBER 17. Location and time TBA.

AND IF YOU WANT THIS TO STOP HAPPENING
Reversing one approval does not change who makes the next one. If you want a City Council that answers to the people who live here rather than to the people who lobby it, the work starts long before an appeal is filed β€” with knowing how your councilmember votes, and who is in the room when they decide. All funds to IM go to a Neighborhood Defense Fund to stop the developers from buying our leadership. Educate + Fund is the only way we stop this.

Track the votes. Know the record. Hold them accountable.
councilwatchcos.com

We are committed to fostering a society that values integrity and transparency. We welcome everyone who shares our vision to join us in making a positive impact.

Address

Colorado Springs, CO

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Integrity Matters posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Integrity Matters:

Shortcuts

Sponsored

Share