Mississippi Center for Public Policy

Mississippi Center for Public Policy We are a non-profit, non-partisan research and advocacy group.

09/03/2026

Parents shouldn’t have to be policy experts to understand their children’s education options. That’s why we created CompareMySchool.com

For the parents and for the children.

09/02/2026

News, Not Narrative – Why We Built the Wire

Newspapers have long been the lifeblood of American democracy. They mattered before there was an America. Franklin was a printer. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay made their case for the Constitution in New York newspapers.

As America grew from thirteen states on the eastern seaboard into a continental nation of fifty, newspapers grew with it. By the middle of the last century, thousands of papers covered states, towns, and even small counties.

Their critical role is to let people at the state and local level see who exercised power in their name, and what they did with it. It is hard to imagine America becoming the democracy it did without them.
Yet that is precisely what we now face. Imagine America without local or state newspapers.

You do not need to imagine it. Since 2005, more than 3,000 local newspapers have closed—around 40 percent of them. Here in Mississippi, Buckley Newspapers shut the Jasper County News and the Smith County Reformer in June 2024. The Reformer had published since 1889.

Advertising dollars moved to the big social media platforms. Local newspapers can no longer pay reporters to cover their own communities.

More of the content is generic. Less of it is truly local news.

Hollowed out, newspapers increasingly cover what local television is reporting, while television reports what local newspapers and radio already treat as relevant. The media landscape becomes an echo chamber. Into that echo chamber pours social media, where a provocative claim travels faster than a reported fact—and from there into conventional wisdom, and finally into public policy.

One consequence of having so few reporters cover so much is that what is presented as news is often just a press release. A public body meets, makes a series of interesting decisions, and reveals a great deal—and the press release says only what somebody wanted said about it.

Without a local reporter sitting there, taking notes, how does the public really find out what public officials are up to? Budgets are set to spend your money without the public knowing what was spent, or on what. School boards vote on your children’s schooling with no parent in the room.

One attempt to address this has been to set up nonprofit media organizations. Mississippi has its fair share of them. They are often well-meaning, and the state is better off for them. But they tend to focus on what is happening statewide, not locally. Nonprofit outlets seldom sit through the Yazoo City Council or the Madison County School Board.

Worse, the nonprofit model can turn news into propaganda. Some of those pumping money into the Mississippi media landscape are doing so in order to create a narrative.

Who can forget the way one or two nonprofit outlets covered the Jackson water crisis a few years ago? Rather than give us the facts about a dysfunctional city government unable to maintain basic infrastructure, they used the story to feed an ideological narrative about Mississippi’s past and politics. I wish they had told us why our state capital did not have clean water.

News as narrative has done extraordinary damage to civic discourse in this country. It is, I am convinced, responsible for the coarsening of political debate.

So where do ordinary people go for accurate local news? Too much is presented through the prism of donor preferences. No wonder Americans often cannot agree on the facts.

I could not see a solution. Until now.

The Mississippi Wire is a news wire, not a newspaper. It reports, verbatim, what public officials say. It does not take what they say and press it into a narrative. It covers public bodies across the state, from the legislature down to school boards.

It is different because it is only - or almost only - primary sourced. If we quote the governor or a local official, we tell you what they said. We do not lift it to suit an editor or a partisan campaign.

That fills the void the old newspapers left, and the one the nonprofits have not been able to fill: the granular detail of truly local stories. Rather than recycle what other outlets are already saying, the Wire gives new news.

Three examples from the past fortnight. Madison County supervisors valued each Amazon data center building at $292 million. Amazon says $70 million. Many millions of dollars of taxable value turns on who is right. Then there was the story about Jackson’s public works director, who told the council his roads budget is going from $22 million to $14 million, which sounds like even bigger potholes. Or a couple of days ago in Greenville, where a judge warned about some of the unintended consequences of the new youth court law.

The Wire lets you see what was decided, not the spin.

A great deal of the mistrust in officials, experts and reporters has been earned. And policing speech does not fix it - we saw that during Covid. But the answer to a false narrative was never to shout it down. It is to make the record available so that anyone can check it. The Wire does not ask to be believed. It shows you what was said and lets you judge.

You can read it at MississippiWire.News

We have designed it so anyone can access the RSS feed, and we actively want other media outlets to take it. The Wire does not need to out-shout the racket. It needs to be the thing the racket gets checked against.

We hope to set a standard for factual reporting: what officials in public bodies around the state say and decide, in their own words.

Honest reporting. We think there is a desperate need for it.

08/28/2026

This is why we do what we do.

Public policy can sometimes feel distant or complicated—but behind every piece of research, every number and every policy debate are real Mississippians whose lives are shaped by the decisions being made.

At the Mississippi Center for Public Policy, our goal is to make those issues clear, accessible and impossible to ignore. We want to give people the information they need to understand what is happening in our state—and the tools to help change it.

Receiving the Innovation in Marketing Award from State Policy Network was an incredible honor. But the real measure of this work will always be whether it reaches people, starts conversations and helps create a freer, more prosperous Mississippi.

That is why we do what we do.

🏆 An award-winning campaign takes collaboration.As we celebrate national recognition for Compare My School, we also want...
08/26/2026

🏆 An award-winning campaign takes collaboration.

As we celebrate national recognition for Compare My School, we also want to recognize one of the partners who helped us get this tool into the hands of Mississippi families: Mississippi Ready.

After launching Compare My School, we reached out to Mississippi Ready about helping us spread the word. They jumped in, created videos highlighting the tool for their audience — and absolutely knocked it out of the park.

That partnership helped us reach even more Mississippi parents with a resource designed specifically for them.

It’s also a reminder of just how powerful collaboration can be. When organizations across our network bring their audiences, ideas and strengths together, we can reach far more people than any one of us could alone.

At the end of the day, we’re all working toward the same goal: a better Mississippi and a brighter future for our children.

Thank you, Mississippi Ready , for believing in Compare My School, helping us share it with families across our state, and being part of this award-winning campaign. We’re grateful to have you in our corner! ❤️

08/26/2026

A special moment for MCPP. 🏆

This week, we accepted State Policy Network’s Communications Excellence Award for Innovation in Marketing for our work on Compare My School.

But the reason behind this project is much bigger than an award.

“Parents shouldn’t have to become policy experts just to understand their children’s education options.”

Compare My School was built to take information that was already public — but incredibly difficult to access — and put it directly into the hands of Mississippi families.

We’re incredibly proud of this recognition, and even prouder of the work behind it.

Here’s the moment we got to accept the award on behalf of MCPP. ❤️

Mississippi think tank wins national award for putting school data back in parents’ handsOrlando, FL— The Mississippi Ce...
08/25/2026

Mississippi think tank wins national award for putting school data back in parents’ hands

Orlando, FL— The Mississippi Center for Public Policy has won State Policy Network’s Communications Excellence Award for Innovation in Marketing for a campaign that took Mississippi’s school data out of the filing cabinet and put it in front of parents.

The award was presented Monday evening at SPN’s annual meeting in Orlando. The Communications Excellence Awards recognize outstanding communications and marketing work among SPN’s nationwide network of state-based think tanks and partners.

MCPP’s entry answered a simple question Mississippi had made needlessly hard: How good is my child’s school, really?

Mississippi publishes a mountain of official school data, but it is scattered across reports, portals and databases that few working parents have time to navigate.

CompareMySchool.com brings that information together. Families can compare their child’s school with others across Mississippi and even enter a child’s grades and ACT score to see how they compare with students at the school, district and state levels.

MCPP paired the tool with a marketing campaign that has driven thousands of Mississippi families to use it — work the judges singled out.

“Parents shouldn’t have to become policy experts just to understand their children’s education options, especially when the information they need is already public — it’s just incredibly difficult to access,” said Anika Page, MCPP Director of Operations, who accepted the award.

“As a mom of three, with two school-aged children, this project is personal to me. We created Compare My School to give families the tools to find answers for themselves and make more informed decisions about their children’s education.”

The recognition comes as Mississippi continues its conversation about educational opportunity and school choice. While significant school choice legislation did not become law in 2026, MCPP believes accessible information is an important part of empowering parents and informing future policy discussions.

🏆 Mississippi innovation, recognized nationally.This week, the Mississippi Center for Public Policy received State Polic...
08/25/2026

🏆 Mississippi innovation, recognized nationally.

This week, the Mississippi Center for Public Policy received State Policy Network’s **Communications Excellence Award for Innovation in Marketing** for our work on Compare My School.

The idea behind the project was simple: Mississippi parents deserve easy access to information about their children’s schools.

The data was already public. The problem was that it was scattered across reports, portals and databases that few working parents have the time to navigate.

CompareMySchool.com changed that by bringing the information together in one easy-to-use, interactive tool — and our accompanying campaign has helped drive thousands of Mississippi families to use it.

As MCPP Director of Operations Anika Page said while accepting the award:

“Parents shouldn’t have to become policy experts just to understand their children’s education options, especially when the information they need is already public — it’s just incredibly difficult to access.”

We’re honored to have this work recognized nationally and even prouder of what it represents here at home: giving Mississippi families better tools to find answers, understand their options and make informed decisions about their children’s education.

Thank you to State Policy Network for this incredible honor. We’re proud to bring this one home to Mississippi! 🏆

08/25/2026

Southaven’s Mayor, Darren Musselwhite, is right.

Last week he told his aldermen that the data center development coming to his north Mississippi city carries national security implications. He called it patriotic. He pointed out that it will bring millions of dollars into the community, and he said it will rank among the most significant economic developments in DeSoto County’s history.

He is right on every count. He is also making that case against the wind.

Because there is a backlash against data centers, and it is growing.

It could be, as the mayor suggests, that the big companies have not done a good enough job of explaining what they are doing, or of showing the neighborhoods around them how they stand to benefit. Perhaps.

But I suspect this is bigger than a communications problem. AI data centers are turning into a live political issue heading into the midterms, with voters across party lines telling pollsters they are worried about higher utility bills and about strained water and power supplies.

Most alarming of all, I saw Texas Governor Greg Abbott boasting on X that his directive has halted up to 1,800 data center projects.

Now, if I had been a fly on the wall when Abbott’s team decided to send that, I suspect the thinking ran something like this. Issue a directive insisting that data centers must not take water needed by local communities, must not take power needed by the grid, and must not push up the cost of electricity — safe in the knowledge that data centers do not actually do any of those things. On that reading, an anti-data-center tweet is political positioning rather than a substantive move against them.

Maybe so. What worries me is what it concedes.

Once a Republican governor of Texas has publicly stamped on data centers for being water-hungry, for raising power prices and for disrupting rural communities, it becomes that much harder for anyone else to show that they do not.

We conservatives need to think through our policy response — and quickly.

Which is why I was so excited to see Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform propose a brilliant idea.

States, he suggests, should require that the tax payments made by data centers go to reduce property taxes at the local level, and income taxes at the state level.

Why is Grover’s suggestion so wonderful?

Because there is a danger in what is coming. Look at Madison County, where Amazon’s data centers are projected to send around $14 million to the county, its schools and its community college in 2027 — rising to roughly $145 million a year by 2033.

That is an extraordinary injection of money into a single county.

And extraordinary injections of money have a habit of growing local government. There is a real danger that some municipal government somewhere decides to turn 1970s Scandinavian.
Much better if those proceeds go on paying down property taxes instead.

That shows a real benefit to a real community. High property taxes are unfair on everyone, but they fall hardest on older folk on fixed incomes. We have arrived at a crazy situation in which a family that has finished paying for its home is essentially having to lease that property back from local and state government for as long as they live in it.

Grover’s idea does something else, too. It helps mayors like Darren Musselwhite. Instead of asking a neighborhood to take a development on trust, he could point at a smaller tax bill and say: there it is.

As luck would have it, Grover Norquist is coming to speak at our annual Gala in a couple of months, where you can hear him expand on this excellent idea. Buy your ticket here. https://mspolicy.org/events

08/18/2026

There are certain modern hypocrisies I notice all the time.

People who complain about capitalism while living in the wealthiest capitalist countries on earth. Progressive activists in America who lament the lack of respect for individual freedom — seemingly unaware of how much of the rest of the world actually lives. People who use a smartphone to post about how much they hate Big Tech.

The newest one is those who complain about data centers while enjoying the extraordinary technology that data centers make possible.

Every industrial advance has needed something to power it. The first — textiles — ran on water wheels, and then on steam engines. The second, of iron and steel, depended on coal. We are only in the foothills of an even greater transformation, and what makes this one possible is electricity and data centers.

I get the argument that you might not want a data center literally next door. That is a fair thing for a neighbor to say. But Mississippi has just under three million people spread across nearly 47,000 square miles. I think we can manage to build where we need to without blotting out the sunshine or using all the water.

Irrigation accounts for about two-thirds of all the water Mississippi uses — our farmers consume vastly more than any data center will.

And Mississippi gets almost 56 inches of rain a year. There is more than enough for every farmer and every data center we could possibly build. Amazon's Canton facility already uses outside air for cooling 91 percent of the year, and from 2027 will run its cooling entirely on recycled wastewater.

Nor do data centers pollute. There are no billowing smokestacks of the kind that marked earlier industrial advances. What there is, is tax revenue.

The numbers in Madison County are worth reading twice. Amazon's data centers there are projected to deliver around $14 million to the community in 2027, rising to roughly $145 million a year by 2033 — including $38 million a year for Madison County schools, $38 million for Canton schools, and $3 million a year for Hinds Community College. Amazon's total commitment across Mississippi now stands at $25 billion.

Which makes what is happening in local government all the more striking.

In July, the City of Jackson voted 5–2 for a six-month moratorium on data centers. Jackson sits in Hinds County — a part of our state that could do more with additional tax revenue than almost anywhere else. And Hinds County is one part of the state where Amazon is already investing: a billion dollars, at Clinton, a few miles down the road.

In Olive Branch, Mayor Ken Adams told the Board of Aldermen this month that the city has spent four months drafting what he described as “a very restrictive” data center ordinance.

There are good arguments in some cases against a data center in a particular neighborhood, and most of these decisions properly belong to local people. But overall, Mississippi should be very pro data center — and not just because of the tax revenue stream they could bring.

AI is going to be a force for good. Sure, like the printing press or the personal computer, it will allow bad people to do bad things. But overall it will make the world a better place. Already, AI is allowing productive people to do far more.

Every new technology has been said to take jobs. In England, Ned Ludd's followers smashed the stocking frames they feared would take theirs. They were wrong. The same warning has since been issued about the tractor, the spreadsheet, the ATM and the shipping container.

In fact the opposite happens. There have never been more jobs in the United States than there are today — close to 159 million Americans on payrolls last month. The real challenge for America's leaders is not a shortage of work. It is a shortage of good employees.

One of the most basic laws of economics is that as the price of something goes down, people buy more of it. Far from producing mass unemployment among lawyers and doctors, AI will lower the cost of legal and medical advice — and we will ask for a great deal more of both. The model for delivering professional advice might change. The number of folk earning a living from the provision of it will grow.

When Matt Ridley came to speak for us in Jackson in March, he called this the Jevons paradox. So who was Jevons?

William Stanley Jevons was an English economist, and one of the first to insist that economics be done with numbers rather than assertions. In 1865 he published The Coal Question, in which he pointed out something that ought to have been impossible. James Watt's steam engine burned far less coal than the engines it replaced. Everyone therefore assumed that Britain would burn less coal. Britain burned vastly more. Because Watt had made steam power cheap, mill owners and mine owners and shipbuilders put engines everywhere, and national coal consumption soared. “It is a confusion of ideas,” Jevons wrote, “to suppose that the economical use of fuel is equivalent to diminished consumption. The very contrary is the truth.”

We should welcome data centers, glory in the AI revolution underway, and be at the forefront of it.

Address

520 George Street
Jackson, MS
39202

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Mississippi Center for Public Policy posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Mississippi Center for Public Policy:

Shortcuts

Share