Stanford Law School Alumni

Stanford Law School Alumni Connecting and engaging 12,000+ SLS alums around the world.

Every River Needs a Good Lawyer “We’re not in the league of the real water warriors. But we’re Californians, we’re outdo...
08/27/2026

Every River Needs a Good Lawyer

“We’re not in the league of the real water warriors. But we’re Californians, we’re outdoor people. We always felt the loss of clear-running healthy rivers and streams would be a loss to future generations.”

For Jim Genes and his brother Dean, a love for rivers instilled in childhood has become a belief they have spent most of their adult lives acting on.

The two brothers grew up in Fresno in the late 1960s and early 1970s, fishing for bluegill and bass on the San Joaquin River with Fifi, a local farmer’s frog-chasing poodle. Their father taught them to fly-fish on the Upper Kings.

Both became whitewater kayakers and watched the West’s postwar dam-building spree take away the rivers they knew.

In 1979, the New Melones Dam was completed on the Stanislaus River, drowning one of California’s most popular whitewater runs. Jim and Dean never dreamed the Stanislaus could be lost under a dam. While others did fight the New Melones Dam, they paid no attention to it, until it was too late.

When the dam builders came for the Upper Kings, Jim and Dean got involved in the fight.

“Over the years, Dean and I have donated to many water and charitable causes that we’re interested in,” Jim says. “We’re not wealthy, and these smaller organizations are forever just trying to raise money to keep the lights on.”

So they went looking for a way to make an impact on a larger scale. The answer was a shift: from writing small checks to various organizations, to directly funding the people who might one day argue to protect rivers and watersheds.

“People only do what the law requires them to do. That’s where law and policy come in—and water lawyers can have that larger impact,” Jim says. “So we asked ourselves, if we can have maximum impact through law, how can we do that?”

What they landed on was clever and specific—the summer between a law student’s first and second year.

“Law students in between their first and second year are super enthusiastic,” Jim says. “So we wanted to create an internship between the first and second year to get students excited about water policy by exposing them to it.”

Public interest internships have long paid less than their private-sector counterparts. Students drawn to public interest work often cannot afford the summer that would launch them into it. A fund like the one provided by Jim and Dean Genes removes that calculation. It also gives students room to spend a summer inside a field they may not have heard of and perhaps find their calling.

The brothers made many cold calls, working from an environmental law directory. Eventually, Peter Drekmeier, policy director of the Tuolumne River Trust (now called Yosemite Rivers Alliance), connected Jim and Dean with Molly Melius at Stanford Law School. Melius, a lecturer in law, manages the Environmental and Natural Resources Law and Policy Program and directs Stanford's Lawyers for a Sustainable Economy initiative. Her counterpart at UC Davis, Professor Karrigan Bork, was a law school classmate. The brothers brought their idea to both Melius and Börk.

“Thanks to the support and creativity of Stanford Law School, we were able to create summer internship programs at both Stanford and UC Davis exposing first- and second-year law students to river and watershed policy,” Jim says.

The Genes Family Fund was established in 2022 and has since supported twenty-two Stanford Law students in obtaining summer funding to do this essential policy work, with up to six more fellows to be named in fall 2026. Internship hosts have included the U.S. Department of Justice, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and the Stanford Environmental Law Clinic.

Because the internship program runs concurrently at UC Davis, that twenty-two figure counts only the Stanford side. As of fall 2026, another twenty-six law students have participated in the Davis program, which also focuses on river and watershed policy.

And while many of the recipients arrive at law school and their 1L summer knowing what field of work they want to go into, not all do. For quite a few, this summer experience is what directs them. To date, at least six of the Stanford students have gone on to work in environmental law.

One UC Davis student had hoped to work in environmental, tribal, and community-based law, and thanks to an internship the Genes Family Fund supported, she connected with the job of her dreams. In 2025, two Stanford Law students worked on an amicus brief filed on behalf of Professor Börk and other UC Davis faculty in a Ninth Circuit water case, San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper v. County of San Luis Obispo.

While these achievements are gratifying, Jim and Dean don't consider them the only measures of the program's success. All law students who participate, regardless of the direction they choose for their futures, come to understand, on some level, the importance of water policy and watershed conservation.

“We’re playing the long game,” Jim says. “We want to expose young people who may come back to water rights at a later point in their lives—be it via career, volunteering, or philanthropy. An internship between the first and second year is a very good time to plant the seed.”

Jim and Dean get to see where the students are placed each summer and where they land afterward. It is philanthropy with an immediate return. To that end, they welcome anyone who wants to contribute to the fund, or even adopt it, name and all.

Their aspiration now is to transform their philanthropic support into a permanent Stanford endowment that funds this internship for law students in perpetuity, and then to do the same at UC Davis, so that both internships outlast them.

“Rivers and their watersheds shaped us and have always been an important part of our lives. We want to ensure future generations have the same opportunities we did,” Jim says.

-VV

Leading on a Global Stage: Adriana Maestas, '01, JD '05, General Counsel at ING AmericasYounger siblings often draw insp...
08/03/2026

Leading on a Global Stage: Adriana Maestas, '01, JD '05, General Counsel at ING Americas

Younger siblings often draw inspiration from the paths carved by their older siblings. Adriana Maestas credits her sister, who blazed the trail as a lawyer:

"She showed me just how valuable this profession is and how those legal skills are useful wherever you go."

Fueled by her desire for global opportunities, Adriana began her career in international law. Before law school, Adriana became a Rotary Scholar in Mexico, where she studied the legal system and worked for a prosecutor. When Adriana attended SLS, she encountered a level of rigor unlike anything she had ever experienced before and soon realized that lawyers truly are a self-selected group. With the support of former Stanford Law School Dean Jenny Martinez, Adriana secured a law clerkship with Judge Weinberg de Roca at the Appellate Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in The Hague, Netherlands.

"Professor Martinez invested in me. She stood for something and believed in things, which was very inspirational to me," says Adriana. "The internship was an amazing experience; working in a UN-created body in an international setting was both impactful and meaningful. I learned so much about international law, human rights, and humanitarian law. It was truly a life-changing experience."

Now, in addition to her career in banking, Adriana is personally committed to tackling environmental challenges and has additionally engaged in pro bono legal work focused on immigration matters, child advocacy, and voter protection.

After several years in private practice, her international drive then took her to London, where she joined a capital markets practice at an international law firm with global clients, followed by six months in Hong Kong before eventually seeking an in-house role in New York.

In 2017, Adriana joined Lloyds Banking Group as a senior legal counsel. There, she had the good fortune of being mentored by the regional general counsel at the time, Steve Dolmatch, which prepared her to become the next regional general counsel.

"The mentorship and personal investment was hugely beneficial. I also was able to see firsthand how an effective sponsor can triple-charge your career," she says. Under the leadership of the then-CEO Andy Schaeffer, Adriana transitioned smoothly into the role of general counsel North America for Lloyds Banking Group.

The dynamic nature of being a general counsel demands a broad understanding across varied legal subject matters and quick adaptability to new challenges and an evolving commercial and regulatory environment.

"There's an important human aspect to being a general counsel—managing and centering communication and relationships is at the heart of what we do. Good relationships form the basis for good work and good outcomes, and everything we do is truly a team effort. I'm proud of the teams I have built, and I strive to foster teams that are guided by values. I lead with equity, trust, transparency, and integrity. I appreciate people who give of themselves in furtherance of the tasks we're entrusted with every day. I want team members to feel empowered, to take ownership of their work, and to grow and challenge themselves."

Navigating the challenges of balancing a demanding career and starting a family has been a pivotal aspect of Adriana's journey.

"They say there's never an ideal time to start a family from a career perspective, and there really isn't," she says. "That said, as the years flew by, I became increasingly certain I wanted to experience motherhood and not lose sight of the most meaningful aspects of life."

After just a few short months in her first general counsel role, Adriana and her husband welcomed their first child.

"I am so grateful to have worked for an institution and leaders that supported me in taking an extended parental leave of eight months. The legal and executive team culture of collaboration that we created also made that possible."

Now, nearly a year into her new career chapter, Adriana is the general counsel for ING Americas. "It is a wonderful challenge! A new platform with lots of stretch opportunities. I'm supporting the business while growing and strengthening the legal team and navigating the complex and changing regulatory landscape."

- VV

Do you have other SLS alumni you’d recommend for a spotlight feature? If so, send them our way! Please email our office at [email protected].

How One Family Turned a Birthday into a LegacyWhen Bob Caplan’s children came together to establish the Robert Caplan La...
07/20/2026

How One Family Turned a Birthday into a Legacy

When Bob Caplan’s children came together to establish the Robert Caplan Law School Scholarship Fund in his honor last year, they were not marking a retirement, because there has been no retirement. They were marking a birthday: his 90th. None of them had attended Stanford Law School. Most of the family had not attended Stanford at all, with the exception of his youngest daughter, Hilary. The gift was not about their connection to the institution, but about his.

"That made me feel really good. My children have their own causes. They did it because of my affinity for Stanford Law School. It was a real compliment,” says Bob.

Bob started at Stanford Law School in 1957. The choice pulled him far from Portland, Oregon, where his family lived, and set a different life in motion than the one he might otherwise have led. He remembers his class, and the faculty that shaped it, with that particular warmth of someone who understood, even then, that something important was happening.

"We had an interesting class,” he says. “Lots of veterans who took law school seriously. Really amazing professors. The faculty was outstanding."

After graduating in 1960, Bob took a position at a small firm in San Diego. He has been at Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek ever since. "If I hadn’t gone to SLS I probably would have ended up in Portland again."

About sixty-five years into his legal career, Bob manages to sound neither tired of the work nor surprised by its longevity. He has watched the practice of law transform in ways that would have been unrecognizable to the young man who graduated in 1960; the pace of it, most of all.

"Obviously the speed at which everything is moving has accelerated,” he says. “You used to send a letter out; in recent years it’s email. People now expect instant answers."

He discusses the earliest word-processing tools, including carbon copies, with the same measured curiosity he brings to recent developments in artificial intelligence.

"AI has added an additional dimension to the practice of the law. You can get cases from AI and get the documents drafted in an instant."

He is 90 years old but has not had a desire to retire. Until two years ago, he was still managing the firm, Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek.

"The larger firms generally move you along but when you are part of a small firm—like mine, which has about thirty-five attorneys—there are ways to remain."

The Robert Caplan Law School Scholarship Fund that bears his name is, by his description, not yet large. But scale, he suggests, is not the point.

"It’s not a large fund but if you get a group of people pooling together and contributing, you can have a real impact,” he says.

What the fund represents to Bob is reciprocity. SLS launched his career. And that career, by any measure, flourished.

"Those of us who graduated and went into the practice of law a while ago have generally done well economically,” he says. “It’s always been more a question of what should be done as opposed to whether something should be done to give back. This scholarship fund is a wonderful way to give back to SLS, which gave us the start of our careers."

For students arriving now, tuition is a very different proposition than it was in 1958. Back then, Bob’s family was able to cover the cost of his legal education.

"I’ve been very fortunate and my children have all done very well. It’s great that this fund can support new students who come to SLS and are being helped financially."

When asked to publicly discuss the new scholarship recently, Bob balanced his humility with the desire to help the school.

"If this scholarship could inspire others to do a similar thing, then that’s fine. I love the concept of encouraging people to give back."

He is 90 years old and still at his desk practicing real property law. “Still doing what Stanford Law School made possible.”

The fund that bears his name carries that same conviction.

To contribute to the Robert Caplan Law School Scholarship Fund, visit give.stanford.edu/honor/caplanfund.

-VV

Gilat Bachar on doing good while doing wellGilat Bachar, JSM '13, JSD '18 is an associate professor of law at Temple Uni...
07/08/2026

Gilat Bachar on doing good while doing well

Gilat Bachar, JSM '13, JSD '18 is an associate professor of law at Temple University Beasley School of Law in Philadelphia.

Q: Congratulations on winning the Burger Prize this year! Can you talk about the work you did to earn the recognition?

A: I was so honored to receive that prize from the American Inns of Court, and I was even more happy to see the topic of my paper get this kind of attention and recognition. The paper that earned the prize, “Plaintiffs’ Lawyers' Disclosure Duties,” looks at how plaintiff-side lawyers can resist settlement secrecy that conceals ongoing risks to public health and safety.

The argument I make is that we don't necessarily need to change the confidentiality rules or the rules of professional conduct, which some previous scholarship has suggested. I'm suggesting that we push lawyers to redefine the scope of their representation at the outset of the relationship with their clients, to basically say we're going to refuse certain kinds of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). The argument is really for a professional culture that's more attentive to the broader public consequences of litigation secrecy, not just focused only on the best interest of an individual client. I think that approach is aligned more closely with the spirit of the rules themselves.

The paper was published by UC Davis Law Review this year. I'm hoping that this honor helps it reach a broader audience. I've already had plaintiffs’ lawyers reach out to me wanting to talk about it.

Q: In layman’s terms, it sounds like your argument appeals to the better angels of the industry, arguing against a race to the bottom. But that change can't just be done through academia, right, it's got to involve the American Bar Association, too?

A: That's right, and as you say, we can't just rely on academic publications to be enough to actually make change. We also need conferences like the one that SLS hosted this spring on transparency and secrecy in civil litigation. That was a conference that brought together judges and lawyers (both defense and plaintiff side), academics, and even a lawmaker, all in the same room talking about these issues. And we need organizations like the National Civil Justice Institute, which co-sponsored the conference. It’s hard whenever you think about a change that really involves changing culture in some ways. Nobody knows how you change a culture. But we know that it can be done.

Q: Talk about how interest in plaintiff-side law is growing at law schools.

A: SLS, I think, is ahead of the curve in that trend because we've had a chapter of the Stanford Plaintiffs' Law Association for a long time, but now a lot of prestigious schools are opening these kinds of chapters.

There have been faculty at SLS (like Nora Engstrom) who have supported this growth for a long time, but I think now it's becoming more of a national trend, which is great. The issues are certainly becoming more complex: we have plaintiff-side firms bringing really interesting cases like suits against social media companies. There’s this understanding that is emerging that doing meaningful plaintiffs’ work, something that really can help society, doesn't have to mean barely making ends meet, right?

There's a way of doing good while also doing well—I’ve discussed this in an article I wrote as part of my JSD dissertation and it really stuck with me. You can make a living in the profession, but also do something that's meaningful and that helps people. So it doesn't have to be a choice between nonprofit work or government and big law.

Q: Talk more about the NDAs, whether our understanding of them is really shifting thanks to some important suits advancing. You can't miss that topic in the news every day. Are we moving to a healthier place on them?

A: I think the needle is moving, but I think it's happening gradually. So what we've seen in recent years, there's definitely been positive change, and I would mark the movement as sort of the beginning of that more recent wave of reform. We've seen a growing number of states that restrict the use of a confidentiality provision, in particular in settlements involving sexual harassment and assault, and people like Gretchen Carlson and her organization Lift Our Voices have been an important part of this.

Congress took a really significant step forward with the Speak Out Act, which limits the enforcement of pre-dispute NDAs that cover these kinds of claims. But I still think reform efforts remain incomplete. That act focuses on pre-dispute NDAs, while most of my work actually addresses post-dispute: when parties sign an NDA as part of a settlement agreement.

That hasn't been regulated on the federal level yet, so it's governed by this patchwork of state laws, which makes it really complicated. I’ve written about this in a recent piece. First of all, some states haven't done anything. Then there are issues around forum choice. Some states do a really good job with how they draft these laws, others not so good, and there are also many areas where secrecy raises serious public interest concerns outside of sexual harassment and assault, like product liability and environmental harms. Those areas remain largely untouched, and it's difficult to legislate in those areas, too, because you have strong opposition as well. The upshot is there's been some progress, but there's still a long way to go.

Q: You’ve been a devoted volunteer to SLS since you left. What has motivated your volunteerism?

A: My connection to SLS is a really important part of my professional and intellectual life. My years at SLS really shaped my scholarly identity, and I feel fortunate to be part of the SLS community, so volunteering is a nice way of giving back. The SLS alum community in Philly is pretty small but I hope it grows. We organized a nice dinner out here this year with some fellow alums. Temple's former dean is a Stanford Law School alum, Greg Mandel, and so he attended. It’s lovely to connect and get to know other alums and think about ways to bring more SLS alums to Philly.

I was a recipient of a public interest fellowship after I graduated with the JSD, and so I participated in that selection process as an alum, reviewing applications and interviewing candidates. And I sat on the Women of Stanford Law alumni steering committee. It was great to be a part of these.

As a former fellow and someone who thinks a lot about legal ethics, the Rhode Center’s work is near and dear to my heart, and Nora Engstrom is a valued mentor. I also enjoy supporting current JSD students who are going on the academic job market. I joined a panel on the academic market for JSDs last year moderated by the director of the program, [Professor] Amalia Kessler, which Dean Triantis also attended. And occasionally current students just reach out to me for one-on-one mentoring.

Q: And you’ve also kept close ties with other faculty when it comes to research.

A: Yes, I’ve co-authored papers with [Professors] Deborah Hensler and Allen Weiner, which were both collaborations that started when I was a student. I'm still in touch with both of them, they're both great. Professor Hensler has been a mentor in many ways, because her work is so interdisciplinary, and because she's so interested in issues of justice and transparency in dispute resolution too.

Q: We’re speaking just before the Supreme Court releases several key decisions this June. What are you watching for this month, if anything?

A: On a personal level as an immigrant and a parent, the birthright case is something that I'm very deeply troubled by and worried about, and I think what it means to be an American is really at stake with that decision. I'm kind of holding my breath for that one.

Also, the Court's ruling in Monsanto v. Durnell is likely to have ramifications well beyond Roundup litigation, strengthening federal preemption as a defense in mass tort cases. The case’s importance lies in its endorsement of federal regulatory approval as a shield against certain state law tort claims, making it a potentially significant precedent for defendants across multiple categories of product liability litigation.

Day of Giving Raises Over $200,000 for Stanford Law SchoolFun facts about Stanford’s second annual fundraising extravaga...
06/24/2026

Day of Giving Raises Over $200,000 for Stanford Law School
Fun facts about Stanford’s second annual fundraising extravaganza.

If you were one of the 100+ donors who made a gift to SLS on Stanford Day of Giving on May 13-14, thank you! We were heartened to see so many alumni and friends come together to support all areas of the law school, from clinical education to financial aid.

To celebrate, we’re sharing some fun highlights to give you an inside look at this year’s event.

Youngest Alum Donor: Scott Findlay, JD ’25, was the most recent alumnus to make a gift—his first donation to the school! Scott chose to direct his support to the Crown Law Library.

Oldest Class Represented: Norman E. Hill helped the JD Class of 1966 earn this distinction with his Stanford Day of Giving gift. Norm has donated to the Law Fund for 51 consecutive fiscal years!

Farthest Afield Gifts: Yvette Yeh Fung, AB ’82, JD ’88, gave from 6,932 miles away in Hong Kong, but honorable mention goes to Jose Mauro Decoussau Machado, LLM ’09, whose gift from Sao Paolo, Brazil clocked in at 6,480 miles away.

Luckiest Alum: Stanford Day of Giving again included challenges,games, and surprises. A Law Fund gift from Genevieve Cox, JD ’03, was randomly selected as a ‘Golden Ticket’ winner, unlocking an additional $5,000 to the fund. Congrats and thank you, Genevieve!

Best Lunch and Learn Opportunity: At an SLS Social in Crocker Courtyard—a casual community-building event series—students were treated to Shake Shack burgers and a conversation between Professor Bob Weisberg, JD ’79, and Vinita Kailasanath, '04, MS '04, JD '10, about their volunteerism and philanthropy to Stanford.

Highest Performing Reunion Class: The Class of 1986 secured $10,000 for the Law Fund for Financial Aid by having the highest participation percentage of any reunion class. The $10,000 counts toward their reunion dollar goal. Well done!

Extra Credit: Special recognition goes to three alumnae who volunteered to serve as ambassadors for Stanford Day of Giving. Thanks for spreading the word, Naomi Waltman, AB '85, JD '88, Kaori Okado, LLM ’26, and Junxuan Wu, LLM ’26!

Day of Giving was a 36-hour celebration of all things Stanford: its passionate community, unique history, and capacity to change the world for the better. We are so grateful for those who participated in big and small ways this year, and look forward to more fun and fundraising next year!

-SLS External Relations

06/17/2026

Summer Gatherings are here! ☀️
Mingle with alumni, connect with classmates, and extend a warm welcome to the newest members of our SLS community: our recently admitted students.

Events will be hosted in cities across the country. See all locations and sign up at https://bit.ly/4gn4r5G

Volunteering in their bloodline: Lillie and Thad Stephens They’ve been committee members, on-campus interviewers, admiss...
05/26/2026

Volunteering in their bloodline: Lillie and Thad Stephens

They’ve been committee members, on-campus interviewers, admissions callers, mentors, fundraisers, guest speakers, moot court panelists, and event hosts. Most of all, Thad Stephens, JD '96 and Lillie Stephens, JD '96, have prioritized gathering their classmates back on campus every five years for Stanford Law reunions.

They’re at it again this year, spreading the word for the 30th reunion of the class of ’96, convening on campus (along with other quinquennial classes) on October 16-17. The pair of devoted SLS volunteers—who met during law school and married soon after—have tallied a combined 37 years of service in various roles since graduation.

Add to their volunteer record that of Thad’s father, George Stephens, LLB '62, and you’ve got a family that’s served in 86 volunteer roles across 68 years, roughly half of the lifespan of the law school.

“We were approached for the fifth-year reunion, and then we’ve been helping with every reunion since,” says Thad.

“It’s given me a great reason to reach out to people I don’t get to talk to often," says Lillie, “and hear what they’ve been up to.”

What’s special about the class of '96, thirty years on?

Lillie points to the diversity of the inspiring work classmates do — from judges to specialists in education, environmental, cannabis, and tribal law, just to name a few. Others left the profession to pursue other passions as authors, pharmacists, jewelers, and entrepreneurs. Like many of their peers, Thad and Lillie followed their own interests: Thad co-founded Equilar, Inc., an executive compensation data company, and has held several business and legal roles in communications and media firms, while Lillie co-founded Helios School, a K-8 non-profit school for gifted learners, and has served in-house at a number of household-name companies.

Asked what else inspires their continued service, both are quick to shout-out classmates who also step up, like Maria Ginzberg, John Owens, Paul Huie, Curtis Kin, Roman Bejger and others. Thad credits classmates who have made an impact philanthropically to SLS.

“There are also many quiet contributors,” he says. “Ours was not an attention-seeking class. People were pretty low key, but there have been some really strong supporters of the school.”

“That's kind of a theme to our class,” Lillie says. “We tend to get more participation at intimate gatherings than at the big events. I want to see if there's a way we can arrange small regional gatherings just for our class for those who don't want to come to the big reunions but want to stay connected as alumni.”

Five years ago, COVID thwarted many reunion classes from gathering. Thad and Lillie led the charge to reconnect once it was safe enough to do so. One bonus for that 2022 gathering: hanging out with the class of ’95 in a co-celebration of their 25th reunion.

Of course, settling in Palo Alto has meant a strong lifelong relationship with the school through volunteerism. Lillie loves returning to speak to classes and counts her remarks at Professor Barbara Babcock’s memorial panel in 2020 as a personal highlight and honor. Thad loves judging moot court competitions when he is able.

“We both felt it was important to give back to SLS,” says Thad. “We know, at least at the time we were there, that tuition only covered about half of the total cost of putting a student through school. We felt an ethical obligation to give back in both our time and financially. But we also appreciate what the school does for the profession. It produces really thoughtful, ethical attorneys. Especially now, with the rule of law being challenged, it's attorneys who are on the front line against a descent into authoritarianism.”

Though housing and classroom space might be more luxurious at SLS than 30 years ago, Lillie says they recognize some of the unique challenges students face today.

“We’ve heard just how harder it is for students these days to talk freely in classes,” she says. “And I see that a lot with younger lawyers coming up. They’re more guarded and there’s more hesitation to take a point of view.”

As for their own children, Thad and Lillie admit that volunteering is in their blood too. As a law student in the UK, their daughter, Emerson-Jane, has started volunteering as a mentor for 1Ls. And their son (Atticus), a studio art major, volunteers at a local art collective.

- JM

Do you have other SLS alumni you’d recommend for a spotlight feature? If so, send them our way! Please email our office at [email protected].

Address

Crown Quadrangle, 559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Stanford Law School Alumni posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share