No Peace Without Justice - Non c'è Pace Senza Giustizia

Indicazioni Sito Web Contatta l'organizzazione

No Peace Without Justice - Non c'è Pace Senza Giustizia Campaigning for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights, Democracy, the Rule of Law and International Justice

The Sakharov Prize for the International Criminal Court: Parliament honours the Court, the Commission leaves it unprotec...
22/10/2026

The Sakharov Prize for the International Criminal Court: Parliament honours the Court, the Commission leaves it unprotected

No Peace Without Justice congratulates the European Parliament on awarding the 2026 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought to the International Criminal Court, and congratulates the Court, its judges and its Prosecutor on a recognition earned at great personal cost.
In naming the Court, the only institution of the European Union elected directly by Europe’s citizens has identified it with the freedoms and the rule of law that the Union exists to defend. The message to the European Commission could not be clearer.
While Parliament honours the Court, the Commission still refuses to use the one instrument it already holds to protect it. The United States has sanctioned the Court’s judges and Prosecutor for performing their judicial functions and has announced further measures against the institution itself. The Commission can shield European citizens and companies from those measures by activating and extending the EU Blocking Statute, Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96. It has chosen dialogue and delay instead.
The Union cannot honour the Court in Strasbourg and leave it undefended in Brussels. The Sakharov Prize settles the argument the Commission has been avoiding: the Court embodies the European legal order, and defending it is the defence of that order.
We congratulate the Parliament. We now call on the Commission to follow it, and to activate the Blocking Statute.

International Criminal Court - ICC

European Parliament

Parliament’s recognition makes the Commission’s refusal to activate the Blocking Statute indefensible. Brussels, 22 October 2026 No Peace Without Justice congratulates the European Parliament on awarding the 2026 Sakharov Prize […]

An Assault on Sovereign Rights for the Sake of ImpunityAs Washington sanctions the International Criminal Court,No Peace...
09/10/2026

An Assault on Sovereign Rights for the Sake of Impunity

As Washington sanctions the International Criminal Court,
No Peace Without Justice calls on States Parties to protect the Court they created.

ROME / BRUSSELS, Friday, 9 October 2026 — Today the United States sanctioned the International Criminal Court itself, having already sanctioned its Prosecutor and judges, a UN Special Rapporteur and three Palestinian human rights organisations. US citizens, residents and companies may no longer deal with the Court, and any bank or company anywhere that does so risks being sanctioned themselves. The intent is explicit: to cut the Court off from its financial and insurance services, its payroll and the software it runs on, so that it can no longer work.

The aim is to put the nationals of the United States and its allies, Israel foremost, beyond the Court’s reach; on 31 July the President said the effort was to “defend Bibi and various other people.” This is a campaign for impunity for atrocities and for double standards: as a Senator, the current Secretary of State backed the Court’s jurisdiction over Russians in Ukraine. It is also an assault on the sovereign right of every State to try crimes committed on its territory or by its nationals, and to join freely with other States to do so. Washington presses States to leave the Court by tying aid, visas and security cooperation to their membership: Chad notified its withdrawal four days after US officials raised it in the same call as travel restrictions on Chadians. That is coercion.

It has not broken the Court, which has kept working through every round of sanctions. States are resisting too: Uganda refused a written US ultimatum to leave the Court, Senegal pledged support to the Court and to the NGOs working with it, and Hungary halted its withdrawal. But explicit collective support has shrunk from 88 States in 2020 to 59 in November 2025, and the European Commission has refused to activate existing blocking legislation.

No Peace Without Justice calls on States Parties to condemn the US sanctions explicitly and at the highest political level. This is no time for silence. But words alone will not keep the Court running, so they must also:
• Apply their blocking laws in full: the European Commission should extend the EU Blocking Statute to these sanctions, and Canada, the UK, Australia, Mexico, Argentina, South Africa and others should use their own.
• Keep the Court’s accounts and services open: direct their regulators to tell banks, insurers and technology providers that these sanctions have no legal effect in their jurisdiction.
• Protect civil society sanctioned for working with the Court on the same terms as the Court itself.
• Keep funding and cooperating with the Court, and refuse any pressure to leave it.
One hundred and twenty-five States chose to establish this Court. Now they must choose to defend it, even against the United States.

International Criminal Court - ICC


As Washington sanctions the International Criminal Court, No Peace Without Justice calls on States Parties to protect the Court they created. ROME / BRUSSELS, Friday, 9 October 2026 — Today […]

23/09/2026
Today No Peace Without Justice mourns the passing and honours the life of its founder, former EU Commissioner and Minist...
11/09/2026

Today No Peace Without Justice mourns the passing and honours the life of its founder, former EU Commissioner and Minister of Foreign Affairs Emma Bonino.

For half a century, Emma Bonino was a committed human rights advocate, both as an everyday citizen and as an elected official. Italy has lost the voice of its civil liberties and women’s rights generation. Europe has lost one of its last committed federalists, for whom a united Europe was a political and human rights project, as much as an economic one. The world has lost one of those most responsible for turning human rights from proclaimed ideals into enforceable claims.

Through her life and her political and institutional activism what we gained is no less concrete: where thirty years ago international justice was only an ideal, we gained the two ad hoc Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and a permanent International Criminal Court; a United Nations moratorium on the death penalty; in Italy we gained more than changed laws, we gained changed lives; and, through the campaigns against female ge***al mutilation and for the Maputo Protocol, a generation of local leaders equipped to carry the same fight forward in Africa and the Middle East. And in us, and others, organisations and structures built to keep doing the work now that she cannot.

I write this as the Secretary-General of the organisation she founded, and as somebody honoured to have called her a friend for many years. No Peace Without Justice exists because Emma Bonino and Marco Pannella decided, in 1993, that a Transnational Radical Party campaign for international justice needed a permanent home, and people who would not tire of making the argument before governments eventually came round to it. The organisation was established in May 1994.

Everything NPWJ has done since, from the initial five year struggle leading to the 1998 Rome Conference establishing the International Criminal Court, to our 2026 campaign on child marriage, and everything in between, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, from Kosovo to Syria, carries her dogged insistence that justice is not a reward States hand out when convenient, but a right that people are entitled to claim.

Her activism did not begin with international justice, and it never confined itself there. In the 1970s she fought, with her Radical Party colleagues, the battles over divorce and abortion that redrew what Italian civil rights law would permit; the fight cost her a criminal prosecution before it won her a change in the law, which is the sequence her whole career would repeat. In 1982, she created Italian Parliamentarians Against Hunger, a campaign that produced a tenfold increase in Italy’s development assistance and showed her a method she never abandoned: turn moral urgency into a specific institutional demand, then hold parliamentarians to it by name. In Italy, she and Marco Pannella taught a generation to play the possible against the probable, and to trust that persistence, not just conviction, moves the line between them.

As European Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid from 1995, she ran ECHO through the Balkan wars; her repeated alarm calls on the massacres at Srebrenica, and later the deportations from Kosovo, forced Brussels to treat the Balkans as a political emergency, not only a humanitarian one. That same decade, she put her authority behind the negotiations that produced the Rome Statute in 1998. The Court that resulted is not hers alone, but NPWJ’s role at the Rome Conference existed because she had built the campaign infrastructure that made it possible for civil society organisations like ours to contribute to changing the course of history.

She went on to lead the “Stop FGM” campaign and, in 1998, after having been detained in Kabul by the Taliban the previous year, “A Flower for the Women of Kabul,” one of the first international actions to put the Taliban’s treatment of women onto governments’ agendas rather than leaving it to advocacy alone. In 2007 she was among those who pushed through the UN General Assembly resolution for a universal moratorium on the death penalty, a text NPWJ had campaigned for since the organisation’s earliest years.

In January 2004, when her role as Italian Foreign Minister was still some years off, she led NPWJ to organise the Sana’a Conference with the Yemeni Government, the first meeting to bring Arab governments and civil society together to discuss democracy, human rights and the ICC on the same agenda. When she became Italy’s Foreign Minister in 2013, the causes did not change; only her tools did.

None of this reads, in retrospect, as a career. It reads as one continuous argument, conducted in parliaments, in Brussels, in Cairo, in Sana’a, at the helm of a Ministry, and in the corridors of the United Nations, and as an activist marching on the streets, that rights are not concluded by treaty but sustained by people willing to keep making the case after the treaty is signed. She made that case for justice through NPWJ for over thirty years, and she made it long before NPWJ existed and with NPWJ at her side until a few years ago.

We do not have the option of grieving her by pausing. The organisation she founded will keep documenting the violations, making the argument and pressing the governments she spent her life pressing, because that is what she asked of everyone who worked alongside her, not what she asked of herself alone.
She will live in that work, and fight in it, for as long as we do it as she taught us to: universal rights are claims to be enforced, not causes to be admired; steadfast, in it for the long haul, and with zero patience for the theory that justice can wait its turn. It can’t, and we won’t.

Niccolò Figà-Talamanca
Secretary-General, No Peace Without Justice

Rome, Friday 11 September 2026 Today No Peace Without Justice mourns the passing and honours the life of its founder, former EU Commissioner and Minister of Foreign Affairs Emma Bonino. […]

No Peace Without Justice condemns in the strongest terms the sanctions imposed by the United States Secretary of State M...
19/08/2026

No Peace Without Justice condemns in the strongest terms the sanctions imposed by the United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tomoko Akane, President of the International Criminal Court, and Abdoulaye Seye, a senior trial lawyer at the Court and a judicial candidate at the Court’s upcoming elections, under Executive Order 14203. The formal designation freezes any US assets the two may hold, but its real effect reaches far beyond US jurisdiction: banks and service providers worldwide, facing correspondent-bank exposure and compliance risk rather than secondary sanctions in law, routinely over-comply by closing accounts and cutting off digital and financial services entirely, regardless of where a designated individual actually banks or lives — over-compliance the EU Blocking Statute exists specifically to prevent, and whose continued, unchecked spread is a direct consequence of the European Commission’s failure to activate it. As documented across the growing list of designated ICC officials, this can mean the loss of ordinary banking, of access to basic online services, and well-documented impact on family members unrelated to their Court work — consequences that fall unevenly depending on nationality and domicile, and that extend, through a chilling effect, to every judge, prosecutor and staff member watching how these two cases unfold, and to the human rights organisations — Al-Haq, Al Mezan and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights — already designated in September 2025 for their work in support of the Court’s mandate.

Read more: click on the link below

International Criminal Court - ICC

Brussels / Rome — 18 August 2026 No Peace Without Justice condemns in the strongest terms the sanctions imposed by the United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tomoko […]

En ce 17 juillet, journée mondiale de la justice internationale, un collectif d’eurodéputés et d’associations des droits...
17/07/2026

En ce 17 juillet, journée mondiale de la justice internationale, un collectif d’eurodéputés et d’associations des droits humains lance un appel à toutes celles et tous ceux qui refusent que la justice internationale soit piétinée.

International Criminal Court - ICC
Eumans
No Peace Without Justice - Non c'è Pace Senza Giustizia

En ce 17 juillet, journée mondiale de la justice internationale, un collectif d’eurodéputés et d’associations des droits humains lance un appel à toutes celles et tous ceux qui refusent que la justice internationale soit piétinée.

Solomy Balungi Bossa, 70, is a Ugandan appeals judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC). She’s one of the judges ...
14/07/2026

Solomy Balungi Bossa, 70, is a Ugandan appeals judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC). She’s one of the judges who have been sanctioned by President Donald Trump for conducting investigations involving the United States and Israel.

She recently participated in an event in Madrid that was part of a campaign organized by the Eumans civic movement and No Peace Without Justice (NPWJ) — supported by six Nobel laureates — to defend the work of international justice. Before joining the ICC in 2018 for a nine-year term, Bossa worked at the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

International Criminal Court - ICC

The 70-year-old Ugandan is one of the ICC judges sanctioned by Washington due to the court’s ongoing investigations involving the United States and Israel

01/07/2026
25/06/2026

In a lawsuit filed today, the Open Society Justice Initiative is representing Kimberly Prost, one of the International Criminal Court (ICC) judges who are subject to U.S. sanctions issued by the Trump administration.

The suit challenges the legality of these sanctions, which the U.S. government imposed against the judges in connection with their decisions on ICC investigations into alleged crimes in Afghanistan and Palestine.

These sanctions are tantamount to a financial death penalty and include asset freezes and travel restrictions.

“These judges are being punished for discharging their judicial duties independently by rendering decisions with which the Trump administration disagrees. This is an effort to pressure them to render future decisions more to the administration's liking,” said James A. Goldston, executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative.

This is the fifth lawsuit against these sanctions. In prior cases, courts have found them unconstitutional. This is the first time ICC judges have gone to court themselves to challenge their designation.

Judge Prost is venerated for her contributions to international justice. She has been a judge at the ICC since March 2018 and previously held numerous high-level legal positions in Canada and abroad, including within Canada’s Department of Justice, the Commonwealth Secretariat, and the United Nations.

Learn more through the link in the comments.

International Criminal Court - ICC
25/06/2026


International Criminal Court - ICC


Sección Jurídicas, Agrupación europeísta, NPWJ, Eumans! y las asociaciones CICC, APDHE, Fibgar y MPDL. Presenta: José Antonio Regueiro. Modera: Liubba El Hadi Hamed. Intervienen: Solomy Balungi Bossa, jueza, CPI; Juan … Seguir leyendo «Justicia atacada. Las sanciones contra la Corte Penal In...

Indirizzo

Rome

Notifiche

Lascia la tua email e sarai tra i primi a sapere quando No Peace Without Justice - Non c'è Pace Senza Giustizia pubblica novità e promozioni. Il tuo indirizzo email non verrà utilizzato per nessun altro scopo e potrai annullare l'iscrizione in qualsiasi momento.

Contatta L'organizzazione

Invia un messaggio a No Peace Without Justice - Non c'è Pace Senza Giustizia:

Scelte rapide

Condividi