http://ncdar.org/CrossnoreChapter/

Crossnore Chapter NSDAR, 200 Chapel Dr, PO Box 386, Crossnore, NC (2026)

08/18/2026

Some of the most influential women of the American Revolution weren't in Boston, Philadelphia, or Williamsburg ... they were on the Texas frontier.

The Rancheras of Spanish Texas remind us that the Revolution was far bigger than the original thirteen colonies.

Under Spanish colonial law, women in San Antonio could own property, manage vast ranches, conduct business independently, and even bring legal cases in court. Women like María Robaina de Bethencourt built thriving ranching operations that became vital to Spain's war effort after 1779.

When Spain entered the war against Great Britain, Governor Don Bernardo de Gálvez needed food to sustain his military campaigns along the Gulf Coast. The Rancheras answered the call, supplying cattle that helped feed Spanish forces as they captured British strongholds at Baton Rouge, Mobile, and Pensacola - victories that diverted British resources away from George Washington's army and contributed to the Patriot cause.

One remarkable document featured in San Antonio's Rancheras exhibit is a 1779 census listing Leonor Delgado, her household, horses, and cattle - evidence of a woman whose contributions to the Revolution were recorded in the official records of her day.

The Daughters of the American Revolution National recognizes a wide range of patriotic service beyond military combat. Men and women who aided the Revolutionary cause in Spanish Louisiana and Texas - including by supplying provisions, supporting Bernardo de Gálvez's campaign, or providing other qualifying patriotic service may be recognized as Patriots. Because these women lived in Spanish territory that actively supported the American cause, their contributions are increasingly being documented and recognized.

The American Revolution wasn't won by one army or one colony. It was sustained by farmers, merchants, sailors, Indigenous allies, free and enslaved laborers, and remarkable women whose geography placed them far from Lexington and Concord - but whose actions still helped shape American independence.

History keeps getting bigger and richer the more we choose to tell the whole story.

08/17/2026

On September 9, 1778, Adrienne de Lafayette sat in Bordeaux, France, preparing to return to Paris. Before leaving, she quickly wrote a heartfelt letter to her husband, Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, who was thousands of miles away serving with the Continental Army in America.

The letter was filled with love, grief, and longing.

The couple had been separated for more than a year. During that time, their young daughter Henriette had died. Adrienne wrote of her joy at soon being reunited with their surviving daughter, Anastasie, whom she called "the only token I have left of our tenderness."

She also begged Lafayette to be careful - "Think about how I love you and how you have made me quite unhappy until now with your absence and the dangers you run into."

But Lafayette never read those words.

The ship carrying the letter was intercepted off the Virginia coast by a British privateer. The vessel was seized and taken to a British vice-admiralty court in New York. As part of the legal process, every document on board was confiscated.

For nearly 250 years, Adrienne's letter sat forgotten in British Admiralty records.

Recently discovered through the Prize Papers Project at the UK National Archives, the letter offers a remarkable glimpse into the personal sacrifices behind the Revolution.

At the time she wrote, Bordeaux was one of the strongest centers of support for the American cause in France. Adrienne noted that conversations there revolved around her husband and "my dear America."

Just months later, Lafayette would return to France a hero. In February 1779 he reunited with Adrienne, and later that year they welcomed a son. They named him George Washington Lafayette.

See more here: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/explore-the-collection/stories/adrienne-de-lafayettes-letter-to-marquis-de-lafayette/

08/16/2026

Think Americans argue about who deserves credit today? John Adams was worried about that in 1783.

In fact, he feared that future generations would reduce the entire American Revolution to just two names: George Washington and Benjamin Franklin.

Writing after the Treaty of Paris, Adams complained that history would become "one continued lie from one end to the other." He sarcastically predicted that people would believe Franklin's lightning rod struck the earth, George Washington sprang from the ground, and together the two men single-handedly won the Revolution.

Behind the humor was a real frustration. Adams believed the true credit for the American Revolution belonged to the people themselves. He argued the revolution was a fundamental shift in the minds, hearts, and religious sentiments of the colonists that occurred in the decades leading up to the war.

Adams had spent years helping lead the cause for independence. So had Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and countless soldiers, sailors, women, and ordinary citizens whose names rarely appear in textbooks. Yet Adams could already see how history works - some figures become legends while others slowly fade into the background.

Was Adams witnessing the Revolution's first conspiracy theory?

Not exactly. But he understood something powerful about human nature. We prefer simple stories. We like heroes. It's easier to remember two great men than the thousands of people who struggled, sacrificed, negotiated, fought, and argued their way to independence.

More than 243 years later, Adams' question is still worth asking - who wrote history and who got written out of it? Perhaps the most fascinating part of the American Revolution isn't who became famous. It's who didn't.

📷: Lisa Biganzoli from National Geographic Kids

08/15/2026

"B. Free Franklin" is one of the most famous postal markings in American history. It wasn't a cancellation in the modern sense, but rather Benjamin Franklin's handwritten signature used as a franking mark. "Free" mean free postage.

A frank was a privilege that allowed certain government officials to send mail without paying postage. Instead of affixing postage (stamps didn't exist until 1847), the sender simply wrote their name on the cover to certify that the letter qualified for free delivery.
-------------
When we think of Benjamin Franklin, we usually picture a kite, a key, or perhaps his role in securing French support during the American Revolution. But did you know one of his greatest contributions was building America's postal system?

On July 26, 1775, just weeks after George Washington took command of the Continental Army, the Continental Congress appointed Benjamin Franklin as the first Postmaster General of the United Colonies.

Why was this so important?

Washington faced a daunting challenge. His army was scattered, Congress was hundreds of miles away in Philadelphia, and every military order, intelligence report, and supply request had to travel by horseback over rough roads. Without secure and reliable communication, the Revolution could not succeed.

Fortunately, no one was better prepared than Franklin.

For more than 40 years, he had transformed the colonial postal system into one of the most efficient in the British Empire. He improved mail routes, sped up deliveries, introduced better accounting, and insisted that newspapers, not just those favored by local postmasters, be delivered throughout the colonies. In doing so, he connected people from Georgia to New England and helped create a shared American identity long before independence was declared.

When war broke out, that experience became a strategic advantage.

The new American postal system carried military orders, intelligence, and government correspondence while helping the Patriots stay one step ahead of British surveillance. Historians argue that without reliable communication, Washington could never have effectively commanded the Continental Army.

It's a reminder that revolutions aren't won by soldiers alone. They also depend on the people who build the systems that keep a nation connected.

08/14/2026

Did you know that part of present-day Avery County was once claimed by the State of Franklin?

On August 23, 1784, settlers in the mountains of what is now eastern Tennessee and parts of western North Carolina declared their independence from North Carolina and established the State of Franklin. Their goal was to create a government that better represented the people living on the rugged frontier, who felt neglected by leaders in the east.

What many people don't realize is that the proposed boundaries of Franklin extended beyond present-day TN. The northwestern corner of modern Avery County, including the Elk Park area near the TN border, fell within Franklin's claimed territory. If you stand in Elk Park today, you're standing in a place that was once part of one of America's most fascinating "almost states."

Led by Revolutionary War hero John Sevier, Franklin adopted its own constitution, elected officials, and operated as a functioning government for several years. However, NC refused to recognize the breakaway state. Governor Alexander Martin denounced the movement, and the Confederation Congress declined to admit Franklin as the nation's 14th state.

Without federal recognition, the experiment gradually unraveled. By 1789, John Sevier had returned to North Carolina politics, effectively ending the State of Franklin. That same year, North Carolina ceded its western lands to the United States, and in 1796, most of Franklin's territory became part of the new state of Tennessee.

Today, the State of Franklin remains one of the most intriguing "what if" stories in American history. It serves as a reminder that the mountains of WNC, including a small corner of present-day Avery County, played a role in an extraordinary chapter of our nation's early frontier history.

08/13/2026

🇺🇸 After 246 Years, an Unknown Revolutionary War Soldier Finally Has His Name Back

For nearly two and a half centuries, he was simply "UNKNOWN." Researchers discovered that the previously-unknown teenager was John Pumphrey, a boy from Maryland who re-enlisted in the Continental Army when he was about 14 years old but sadly died three years later in the Battle of Camden.

Buried beneath a modest headstone at the site of the Battle of Camden in South Carolina, no one knew his name, where he came from, or who had loved him. Time had erased his identity, but not his sacrifice. Today, thanks to archaeology, forensic science, DNA technology, and countless hours of genealogical research, we know his name.

🇺🇸 Private John Pumphrey 🇺🇸
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/283891131/john-pumphrey

John was likely born in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, around 1762 or 1763. He was a direct descendant of Walter Pumphrey, a Quaker who immigrated to New Jersey from England in 1678. The family moved to the Baltimore area in 1713, originally to open up a carpentry shop. Historians believe he lost both of his parents while still a child, leaving him an orphan with few opportunities. Like many young boys of the Revolutionary era, military service offered food, clothing, purpose, and perhaps hope for a better future.

The Pumphrey family became prominent in the Baltimore area, with extensive real estate holdings and business interests. His grandfather, Ebenezer Pumphrey, was a notable player in the state’s lumber and building industries. The fact that John Pumphrey came from a family of high status left researchers baffled at first. After more digging, the team discovered that Pumphrey’s father died in 1771, when the boy was only about 10 years old. In a strange occurrence, the land owned by Pumphrey’s father somehow got passed to his cousin instead of his several sons. Likely with no other prospects of land ownership, Pumphrey turned to another future for himself in the Continental Army.

At only about 14 years old, John traveled to Baltimore and enlisted in the Continental Army. He joined the 7th Maryland Regiment, one of the elite units of the famed Maryland Line. Unable to write his own name, he signed his enlistment papers with a simple "X."

Although still just a teenager, John would soon witness some of the most important moments of the American Revolution.

He marched with General George Washington's army through the Philadelphia Campaign, fought at Brandywine and Germantown, endured the bitter winter at Valley Forge, where Washington's army transformed into a disciplined fighting force under Baron von Steuben, and later fought at the Battle of Monmouth.

By 1779, John had proven himself enough to reenlist, again signing his contract with an "X." His regiment was eventually ordered south to confront British forces under General Charles Cornwallis. Before reaching South Carolina, John had marched nearly 1,000 miles in service to the cause of American independence.

On August 16, 1780, at the Battle of Camden, one of the Continental Army's greatest defeats, John Pumphrey was killed. Only a teenager. Like hundreds of others who fell that day, his body received only a hurried burial beneath a thin layer of earth. Over time, his identity disappeared completely. For more than 240 years, he was known only as "Camden 9B" - an archaeological catalog number.

Then, in 2020, archaeologists surveying the battlefield noticed human bones emerging from the soil. Fourteen sets of remains were recovered, including twelve Continental soldiers. Scientists first attempted to recover DNA from John's teeth, but the effort failed. Instead, they turned to one of the densest bones in the human body - the petrous bone. Against all odds, they successfully recovered his entire genome.

Using investigative genetic genealogy, researchers compared his DNA with more than 20,000 genetic matches and painstakingly reconstructed his family tree. Historical records, military documents, and living descendants confirmed the answer. The unknown soldier was Private John Pumphrey. The research team believes that the groundbreaking identification was the first of its kind, an important step forward into uncharted territory - "nobody’s ever identified a 246-year-old John Doe before.”

Imagine serving your country, giving your life for liberty before reaching adulthood, and then having your name forgotten for nearly 250 years.

Today, John's story reminds us that the American Revolution was not won only by famous generals and statesmen. It was won by ordinary people - farmers, laborers, immigrants, craftsmen, and even teenage boys - who believed in something larger than themselves.

John Pumphrey's story is a powerful reminder that history is still being discovered. Every soldier has a story. Every sacrifice deserves to be remembered. Today, we honor not only Private John Pumphrey, but all of the unnamed patriots whose courage helped secure the freedoms we enjoy today.

🇺🇸 Welcome home, Private John Pumphrey. Your nation remembers you.

08/12/2026

🇺🇸 Was America's War for Independence Really a "Just War"?

It's worth asking a question that historians, legal scholars, military ethicists, and theologians have debated for generations: Was the American War for Independence morally justified?

Most of us learned that the conflict began because of "taxation without representation." While that statement is true, it tells only part of the story. The deeper issue wasn't simply the amount of taxes the colonists paid. In fact, many people living in Britain paid significantly higher taxes. So if money wasn't the real issue, what was?

The answer lies in a question of authority. Colonial leaders argued that Parliament had no constitutional right to impose taxes on people who had no representation in that body. To them, the issue was never about a tax on tea or paper. It was about whether a distant government could claim unlimited authority over people who had no voice in its decisions. If Parliament could tax the colonies without their consent, what other rights could it eventually claim the power to control?

This is where the centuries-old ⚠Just War Tradition⚠ becomes especially interesting. Developed over nearly 2,000 years, it asks whether a war can be considered morally justified by examining questions such as: Was there a just cause? Did legitimate authorities authorize the conflict? Were peaceful solutions sincerely attempted? Was war truly the last resort?

When those questions are applied to the American colonies, the story becomes far more nuanced than many of us learned in school.

Many colonial leaders spent years seeking reconciliation rather than separation. They petitioned Parliament, protested new policies, and appealed directly to King George III. Even after fighting had already begun at Lexington and Concord, the Second Continental Congress sent the Olive Branch Petition in July 1775, reaffirming its loyalty to the Crown and asking for peace. The King declined the petition and proclaimed the colonies to be in open rebellion. For many colonists, these events reinforced the belief that peaceful reconciliation was no longer possible.

That sequence of events raises an important question. If repeated attempts at negotiation are rejected, at what point does a people have the moral right to defend what they believe are their constitutional liberties?

Even some prominent British leaders believed Parliament had mishandled the crisis. William Pitt argued that Britain's policies were unjust and warned against trying to subdue the colonies by force. Edmund Burke urged Parliament to seek reconciliation rather than coercion and later described the Americans as acting "purely on the defensive." These were not American revolutionaries - they were respected British statesmen who believed their own government had made serious mistakes.

None of this suggests that the War for Independence was perfect. Like every war, it involved suffering, moral failures, and tragic decisions on both sides. History is rarely as simple as heroes and villains. Scholars continue to debate whether the colonies ultimately satisfied every requirement of the Just War Tradition. However, many conclude that the colonies had a legitimate cause, acted through recognized political authority, and resorted to armed resistance only after years of unsuccessful efforts to preserve their rights within the British Empire.

As we commemorate the 250th anniversary of our nation's founding, perhaps the most valuable lesson is not found in slogans or simplified narratives. The Declaration of Independence did not emerge from a single dispute over taxes. It was the culmination of years of constitutional debate, petitions for redress, and a growing conviction among many colonists that self-government and liberty could no longer be secured under British rule.

Whether one ultimately agrees or disagrees with that conclusion, examining the American War for Independence through the lens of the Just War Tradition reminds us that the conflict was far more than a dispute over taxes. It was a profound debate about constitutional authority, representation, religious liberty, self-government, and the circumstances under which the use of force can ever be morally justified.

⭐ Overall Assessment ⭐

If scored on the six classical criteria, many Just War scholars would assess the American War of Independence approximately like this:

✔️ Just Cause: Strong but debated - Must confront a specific, undeniable danger, such as self-defense or protecting victims from an ongoing grave injustice

✔️ Legitimate Authority: Yes - War must be declared by a recognized, lawful governing body, not by private groups or individuals.

✔️ Right Intention: Mostly yes - Objective must be to advance good, establish justice, or protect the innocent, rather than to pursue territorial expansion or revenge.

✔️ Last Resort: Strongly yes - All diplomatic, legal, and non-violent options must be fully exhausted before resorting to armed conflict.

✔️ Probability of Success: Yes - Realistic chance of achieving the stated objectives

⚖️ Proportionality: Debated - The anticipated benefits and values of going to war must outweigh the projected harm, suffering, and destruction caused by the conflict.

History becomes richer when we move beyond asking what happened and begin asking why people believed they had no other choice. Those are the questions that continue to challenge and inspire students of history 250 years later.

08/11/2026

🇪🇸 🇺🇸 Bernardo De Galvez is an American Revolution hero who deserves more attention. As America celebrates its 250th anniversary, it's the perfect time to remember one of the Revolution's most important but often overlooked allies.

Bernardo de Gálvez, the Spanish governor of Louisiana, played a pivotal role in securing American independence. After Spain entered the war against Great Britain in 1779, Gálvez led a remarkably diverse force of Spaniards, Cubans, Mexicans, Acadians, Native Americans, free Black Americans, and Creoles to victories at Baton Rouge, Mobile, and Pensacola.

His 1781 victory at Pensacola crippled British control of the Gulf Coast and helped make it possible for French naval forces to sail to the Chesapeake, where they supported George Washington at the decisive Siege of Yorktown. Historians often note that without Pensacola, Yorktown may not have been possible.

Gálvez's most important connection to the American Revolution was his close working relationship with Oliver Po***ck, an Irish-born merchant who served as a commercial agent for the Continental Congress in New Orleans. Long before Spain officially entered the war against Great Britain, Po***ck and Gálvez worked together to secretly channel muskets, gunpowder, uniforms, medicine, and other vital supplies up the Mississippi River to the American Patriots. Po***ck acted as a trusted intermediary between Spanish officials and American leaders, while Gálvez used his authority as governor of Spanish Louisiana to facilitate the movement of military aid and later coordinate operations against British forces. Their partnership was built on mutual trust and a shared strategic goal of weakening Britain. Historians regard Po***ck as Gálvez's closest American associate and one of the key figures who connected Spanish support with the Patriot cause, demonstrating that the fight for American independence depended not only on battlefield victories but also on international cooperation behind the scenes.

Now, nearly 250 years later, Gálvez is receiving renewed recognition. The Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery has placed a rare 1781 portrait of him on display in its 'Out of Many' exhibition, highlighting the many people and cultures that shaped the founding of the United States.

Congress recognized Gálvez's extraordinary contributions in 2014, granting him honorary U.S. citizenship - an honor bestowed on only a handful of individuals.

As we commemorate America250, let's remember that American independence was achieved not only through the courage of the Patriots, but also through the support of allies like Bernardo de Gálvez and countless others whose stories deserve to be told.

⭐ He helped win the American Revolution without ever fighting at Yorktown. Gálvez's victory over the British at the Siege of Pensacola in 1781 forced Britain to divert troops and ships away from the eastern colonies, helping make George Washington's victory at Yorktown possible.

⭐ He became governor of Spanish Louisiana at just 30 years old. Appointed in 1777, Gálvez governed one of Spain's most strategically important colonies during the Revolutionary War.

⭐ He secretly supported the American Patriots before Spain officially entered the war. Before Spain declared war on Britain in 1779, Gálvez quietly sent guns, ammunition, uniforms, medicine, and money up the Mississippi River to aid the Continental Army.

⭐ His army was one of the most diverse fighting forces of the Revolution. His troops included Spaniards, Cubans, Mexicans, French Creoles, Acadians, Native Americans, free Black soldiers, and European volunteers, demonstrating that America's fight for independence had international support.

⭐ He captured three major British strongholds. Gálvez led successful campaigns to seize Baton Rouge (1779), Mobile (1780), and Pensacola (1781), eliminating British control of West Florida.

⭐ His personal courage became legendary. During the attack on Pensacola, other Spanish naval commanders hesitated to enter the heavily defended harbor. Gálvez sailed his own ship in first, inspiring the rest of the fleet to follow.

⭐ He earned the motto "Yo Solo" ("I Alone"). After boldly leading his ship into Pensacola Harbor ahead of the fleet, King Charles III of Spain allowed Gálvez to add the words "Yo Solo" ("I Alone") to his coat of arms in recognition of his bravery.

⭐ He became one of the youngest viceroys in Spanish history. In 1785, Gálvez was appointed Viceroy of New Spain (modern-day Mexico and much of the American Southwest), one of the Spanish Empire's highest offices.

⭐ The U.S. Congress made him an honorary American citizen in 2014. This rare honor has been granted to only a handful of people, recognizing Gálvez's indispensable contribution to American independence.

⭐ The city of Galveston, Texas, is named after him. Its name comes from "Galvez Town," honoring Bernardo de Gálvez's service to Spain and his influence along the Gulf Coast.

08/10/2026

🐴 George Washington Took a Road Trip That Helped Save the American Republic 🇺🇸

Imagine becoming the first president of a brand-new nation ... one that had just fought a revolution, had no history of presidential leadership, and still left many people wondering whether this experiment in self-government would actually survive.

Now imagine that instead of staying in the capital, you got on a horse and traveled hundreds of miles through rough wilderness to meet the people you served. That is exactly what George Washington did. He had already traveled through northern states, and now he wanted Americans in the South, especially in Virginia and the Carolinas, to know they were part of this new nation.

In the spring of 1791, just two years into his presidency, Washington left Philadelphia and headed south. It was his first and only visit to North Carolina, and it was about much more than a trip. It was about convincing Americans that this new government belonged to them.

Today, we often look back at the founding of the United States as if success was guaranteed, but it wasn’t. In 1791, America was still an experiment. The Revolutionary War had ended only about ten years earlier, the country had struggled under the weak Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution had only recently created a stronger federal government. Even that change had been controversial. Some Americans worried the new government had too much power, while others wondered whether a collection of states with different interests could truly become one nation.

Washington understood the problem. A government cannot survive if people do not trust it, and trust required something simple - people needed to see their president.

He also believed the presidency was more than a title written into the Constitution. The office had to mean something. There was no guidebook, no previous president, and no traditions to follow. Every decision Washington made would become an example for those who came after him. So he created one of the earliest traditions of presidential leadership - go directly to the people.

Modern presidents travel with airplanes, security teams, and carefully planned schedules. Washington traveled by horseback and carriage. His small group included members of his household staff, horses and carriages, Major William Jackson, a Revolutionary War veteran who served as his secretary, and attendants who traveled with him.

There were no interstate highways, no comfortable hotels, and no easy transportation. Roads were often muddy paths, rivers had to be crossed carefully, and bad weather could bring travel to a standstill. A journey that takes hours today could take weeks in 1791.

Washington’s stops became celebrations. Communities hosted dinners, dances, speeches, cannon salutes, and patriotic toasts. But beneath the festivities was a deeper message - the South mattered, North Carolina mattered, and every region mattered. The United States was not simply a collection of states along the eastern seaboard. It was a shared project.

George Washington’s 1791 journey reminds us of something important - a nation is not built only through laws and documents. It is built through relationships. Washington could have remained in Philadelphia and governed from behind a desk, but instead he traveled hundreds of miles to listen, observe, and connect. He understood that the presidency was not about standing above the people. It was about standing among them.

More than 230 years later, his Southern Tour remains a powerful example of leadership - sometimes the best way to unite a nation is to show up.

The phrase “Washington Slept Here” became a symbol of America’s desire to preserve a personal connection to its founding story, but the irony is that Washington’s 1791 Southern Tour was itself designed to create a different kind of symbol. He understood that a new nation needed more than laws and institutions - it needed moments that showed ordinary Americans that the president, and the government he represented, belonged to them.

08/10/2026

🕊️ Celebrate 100 Years of Crossnore Presbyterian Church, PCUSA

Join us Tuesday, August 11, at 7 p.m. in the Crossnore Presbyterian Church sanctuary for a special CPC Summer Series program, “The Centennial Celebration of the Building of the Crossnore Presbyterian Church.”

As we celebrate the 100th birthday of this historic sanctuary, the program will take us back to 1926 and explore what was happening in Crossnore and the surrounding community when this beautiful church was built.

A special focus will be on Mary Martin Sloop, one of the most influential figures in Crossnore’s history. Dr. Sloop was instrumental in the creation of Crossnore Communities for Children, the Crossnore Chapter NSDAR, and Crossnore Presbyterian Church. Her vision, determination, and commitment to the people of this community left a lasting legacy that continues to shape Crossnore today.

Karl Campbell, Rev. Maggie Lauterer, George Riggsbee, and Pastor Kathy Campbell will share stories of the church's founders and history, explore the Sloop family's connection to Crossnore, and highlight the role the church has played in the community over the past century.

Guests will also have the opportunity to learn about the lengthy restoration of the sanctuary that was recently completed, including the brand-new roof. They will point out architectural and historic features of the sanctuary and share some of the work that went into preserving this special landmark.

Come celebrate 100 years of faith, history, and community, honor those who built the foundation for Crossnore, and look toward the future as the congregation rededicates its beautifully restored sanctuary and recommits to its ongoing mission.

Crossnore Chapter NSDAR

08/18/2026

08/17/2026

08/16/2026

08/15/2026

08/14/2026

08/13/2026

08/12/2026

08/11/2026

08/10/2026

08/10/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Organization

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request