Death Penalty Information Center

Death Penalty Information Center DPI serves the media and public with analysis and information on issues related to capital punishment

The Center was founded in 1990 and prepares in-depth reports, issues press releases, conducts briefings for journalists, and serves as a resource to those working on this issue. The Center is widely quoted and consulted by all those concerned with the death penalty. In addition, we have high school and college educational curricula available to students and educators on our website, as well as som

e material in Spanish. View a video synopsis of DPIC's work: http://youtu.be/r8ZdYfs1Zeo
For media inquiries, please call 202-289-4022

In May 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued deci­sions regard­ing two key types of claims that often appear in cap­i­tal ...
06/01/2026

In May 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued deci­sions regard­ing two key types of claims that often appear in cap­i­tal cas­es: jury dis­crim­i­na­tion and intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. A bipar­ti­san group of con­ser­v­a­tive and lib­er­al jus­tices car­ried each deci­sion. The Court ruled in favor of Mississippi pris­on­er Terry Pitchford, allow­ing his jury dis­crim­i­na­tion claim to pro­ceed; the Court sep­a­rate­ly dis­missed an Alabama case as improv­i­dent­ly grant­ed, which pre­serves a low­er court find­ing that Joseph Clifton Smith has intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty and can­not be exe­cut­ed. At the same time, how­ev­er, the Court vacat­ed a low­er court stay and allowed the exe­cu­tion of Edward Busby to pro­ceed in Texas despite expert find­ings that he too had intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty — draw­ing a sear­ing dis­sent from several justices.


To learn more, read our story:

In May 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued deci­sions regard­ing two key types of claims that often appear in cap­i­tal cas­es: jury dis­crim­i­na­tion...

Texas has now carried out 600 ex*****ons in the modern death penalty era.On May 14th, Edward Busby became the 600th pers...
05/30/2026

Texas has now carried out 600 ex*****ons in the modern death penalty era.

On May 14th, Edward Busby became the 600th person executed in Texas, despite agreement from both defense and state-retained experts that he had an intellectual disability and should have been constitutionally ineligible for ex*****on.

A recent analysis from the Death Penalty Information Center (DPI) underscores that Mr. Busby's ex*****on, and this 600th milestone, is not simply another ex*****on.
Rather, this milestone reflects decades of racial disparities, geographic arbitrariness, wrongful convictions, enormous financial costs, and the ex*****on of vulnerable people- including individuals with intellectual disability and juveniles before constitutional protections were established.

At the same time, the analysis tells another story: Texans are increasingly rejecting the death penalty. Death sentences and ex*****ons have declined dramatically, and the use of capital punishment is now concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Yet even as the use of the death penalty declines, the same systemic concerns persist: arbitrariness, racial disparities, unreliable outcomes, and the continued ex*****on of vulnerable people- realities that have been reflected in every ex*****on Texas has carried out this year.

As Texas sits with this grim milestone, we must confront what 600 ex*****ons have cost our state at both a financial and human level.

You can read the full DPI report at the link below.

https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/will-a-person-with-intellectual-disability-become-texas-600th-ex*****on-in-the-modern-era

In most U.S. jurisdictions, when prosecutors seek the death penalty, the case does not end in a death sentence. A 2025 i...
05/29/2026

In most U.S. jurisdictions, when prosecutors seek the death penalty, the case does not end in a death sentence. A 2025 investigation into Maricopa County found that 87% of capital pursuits over 20 years resulted in something other than a death sentence. The capital-case costs were already spent.

The death penalty triggers a more expensive legal apparatus from the moment charges are filed, regardless of outcome: larger legal teams, longer trials, specialist witnesses, death row housing, mandatory appeals.

DPI’s What to Know installment breaks down where the money goes, stage by stage.

Link in bio.

In the May 2026 episode of 12:01 The Death Penalty in Context, DPI Managing Director Anne Holsinger speaks with Dr. Naom...
05/28/2026

In the May 2026 episode of 12:01 The Death Penalty in Context, DPI Managing Director Anne Holsinger speaks with Dr. Naomi Yavneh Klos (pic­tured), Dean of the Honors College at the University of New Mexico, and a promi­nent schol­ar of the Holocaust. Dr. Yavneh Klos is a found­ing mem­ber of the Jews Against Gassing Coalition, a New-Orleans area group formed to oppose the use of nitro­gen gas as a method of exe­cu­tion in Louisiana. She joins DPI’s pod­cast dur­ing Jewish American Heritage Month to dis­cuss the his­tor­i­cal ties between lethal gas exe­cu­tions and the use of gas as a tool of geno­cide dur­ing the Holocaust.

Dr. Yavneh Klos describes her path from Renaissance schol­ar­ship to Holocaust edu­ca­tor, explain­ing that her work with the Anne Frank House and the exhib­it Anne Frank: A History for Today led her to explore how empa­thy and com­pas­sion can be cul­ti­vat­ed in stu­dents. That same com­mit­ment to his­tor­i­cal mem­o­ry and human dig­ni­ty has also shaped her advo­ca­cy work. Dr. Yavneh Klos explains that the Jews Against Gassing Coalition was formed after Louisiana passed leg­is­la­tion in 2024 autho­riz­ing nitro­gen gas exe­cu­tions, and that while the Jewish com­mu­ni­ty holds divid­ed views on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment itself, oppo­si­tion to exe­cu­tion by gas was one area of unan­i­mous agree­ment — what she describes as ​“vehe­ment opposition.”

*****ons
To listen to the full episode, visit our website:

In the May 2026 episode of 12:01 The Death Penalty in Context, DPI Managing Director Anne Holsinger speaks with Dr. Naomi Yavneh Klos (pic­tured), Dean...

In her chap­ter of the new­ly pub­lished book Neuroscience in Criminal Justice Systems: The Positive Impact of Neurojust...
05/28/2026

In her chap­ter of the new­ly pub­lished book Neuroscience in Criminal Justice Systems: The Positive Impact of Neurojustice, Fordham Law Professor and Founding Director of the Neuroscience and Law Center Deborah Denno explores the use of neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence in crim­i­nal cas­es involv­ing brain injury, both from exter­nal caus­es (e.g., car acci­dents or gun­shot wounds) and inter­nal caus­es (e.g., demen­tia or alco­hol-induced brain dam­age). The chap­ter titled, ​“The Neuroscience of Brain Injury in Criminal Cases: An International Scope,” com­pares Professor Denno’s own research in the United States with sim­i­lar stud­ies in five oth­er coun­tries, none of which use the death penal­ty (Australia, Canada, England and Wales, and The Netherlands). She par­tic­u­lar­ly focus­es on the hypoth­e­sized ​“dou­ble-edged sword effect,” in which neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence of brain injury may be seen as both mit­i­gat­ing and aggra­vat­ing in criminal cases.


To learn more, visit our website:

In her chap­ter of the new­ly pub­lished book *Neuroscience in Criminal Justice Systems: The Positive Impact of Neurojustice*, Fordham Law Professor and...

Tennessee​’s attempt to exe­cute Tony Carruthers on May 21, 2026, failed after exe­cu­tion team mem­bers could not estab...
05/27/2026

Tennessee​’s attempt to exe­cute Tony Carruthers on May 21, 2026, failed after exe­cu­tion team mem­bers could not estab­lish an intra­venous line after more than an hour of attempts, prompt­ing Governor Bill Lee to grant a one-year reprieve. In a writ­ten state­ment, the Tennessee Department of Corrections said med­ical per­son­nel had quick­ly estab­lished a pri­ma­ry IV line but were unable to estab­lish a back­up line as required by the state’s exe­cu­tion pro­to­col. Efforts to insert a cen­tral line also failed, and offi­cials called off the ex*****on.

According to coun­sel for Mr. Carruthers, exe­cu­tion team mem­bers punc­tured him more than a dozen times while repeat­ed­ly attempt­ing to estab­lish an IV line before the exe­cu­tion was stopped. Maria DeLiberato, one of Mr. Carruthers’ attor­neys who was in the exe­cu­tion cham­ber, said she saw Mr. Carruthers ​“winc­ing and groan­ing” while offi­cials attempt­ed to find a vein, call­ing it ​“hor­ri­ble” to watch, and telling the media they ​“should have been in that room with” her to witness it.

*****on
To learn more, visit our website:

Tennessee​’s attempt to exe­cute Tony Carruthers on May 21, 2026, failed after exe­cu­tion team mem­bers could not estab­lish an intra­venous line...

The Death Penalty Information Center’s new report on race and the death penal­ty in South Carolina places the state’s de...
05/22/2026

The Death Penalty Information Center’s new report on race and the death penal­ty in South Carolina places the state’s death penal­ty sys­tem in his­tor­i­cal con­text, doc­u­ment­ing how racial and state sanc­tioned vio­lence con­tin­ue to influ­ence the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penal­ty.Examining South Carolina’s History of Racial Violence and Capital Punishment, released May 2026, notes the state’s well-doc­u­­men­t­ed use of state-sanc­­tioned vio­lence that has dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed Black com­mu­ni­ties for more than 150 years.

These acts of racial ter­ror are not sep­a­rate from for­mal sys­tems of pun­ish­ment Western and Central regions of South Carolina reflect con­ti­nu­ity with the state’s his­to­ry of racial vio­lence. Counties such as Lexington and Greenville, which account for 13 doc­u­ment­ed racial ter­ror lynch­ings, have also imposed 28 death sen­tences on Black defen­dants since 1975.


To learn more, visit our website:

The Death Penalty Information Center’s new report on race and the death penal­ty in South Carolina places the state’s death penal­ty sys­tem in...

Absent court action, Tony Carruthers is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Tennessee on May 21, 2026, despite untest­ed DNA ...
05/20/2026

Absent court action, Tony Carruthers is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Tennessee on May 21, 2026, despite untest­ed DNA evi­dence, an inno­cence claim, and seri­ous men­tal ill­ness con­cerns. On May 18, faith lead­ers, civ­il rights advo­cates and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers marched to the state capi­tol to urge Governor Bill Lee to grant Mr. Carruthers clemen­cy or stay his exe­cu­tion to allow addi­tion­al DNA test­ing, deliv­er­ing a peti­tion with over 130,000 sig­na­tures. Gov. Lee announced on May 19 that he has no plans to inter­vene and stop the exe­cu­tion. Mr. Carruthers’ case has drawn nation­al atten­tion as his sched­uled exe­cu­tion date nears, includ­ing from celebri­ty Kim Kardashian, who urged her 345 mil­lion Instagram fol­low­ers to call Gov. Lee’s office to press for the DNA test­ing, and from Demetrius Minor, the Executive Director of Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty.


To learn more, visit our website:

Absent court action, Tony Carruthers is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Tennessee on May 21, 2026, despite untest­ed DNA evi­dence, an inno­cence...

05/20/2026

On July 16, 2020, the federal government executed Wesley Purkey. His defense team received notification that the ex*****on would proceed via email hours after his originally scheduled ex*****on time had passed.

In this episode of 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, Elizabeth Vartkessian, Executive Director of Advancing Real Change (ARC) and a mitigation specialist on Mr. Purkey’s defense team, discusses the procedural anomalies surrounding his ex*****on and the impact those systemic failures have on capital defense work.

Listen to the full episode on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or at the link in our bio.

12:01: The Death Penalty in Context is a podcast produced by DPI providing in-depth conversations on the realities of the U.S. capital legal system. 

On May 13, 2026, the city of Austin, Texas agreed to pay $35 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion to four men — three sur­viv­ing...
05/19/2026

On May 13, 2026, the city of Austin, Texas agreed to pay $35 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion to four men — three sur­viv­ing and one deceased — who spent years under the shad­ow of wrong­ful con­vic­tions, accused of an infa­mous quadru­ple mur­der that DNA proved none of them com­mit­ted. The set­tle­ment, which must still be approved by the Austin City Council, came less than three months after a Travis County judge declared Robert Springsteen, Michael Scott, Forrest Welborn, and Maurice Pierce inno­cent of mur­der charges that once made head­lines. Mr. Springsteen had been sen­tenced to death, Mr. Scott was sen­tenced to life in prison, Mr. Welborn and Mr. Pierce were charged and pub­licly iden­ti­fied as involved in the crime but nev­er tried. Austin City Manager T.C. Broadnax issued a pub­lic state­ment call­ing the set­tle­ment ​“the final chap­ter of a dev­as­tat­ing sto­ry in Austin’s his­to­ry,” and expressed ​“hope that this set­tle­ment brings a sense of clo­sure to every­one affect­ed by this horrific event.”


To learn more, visit our website:

On May 13, 2026, the city of Austin, Texas agreed to pay $35 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion to four men — three sur­viv­ing and one deceased — who spent...

Address

Washington D.C., DC

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Death Penalty Information Center posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Death Penalty Information Center:

Featured

Share