Family Research Council

Directions Website Contact the organization

Family Research Council Our mission is to serve in the kingdom of God by championing faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview.

Family Research Council's mission is to serve in the kingdom of God by championing faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview.

10/22/2026

— POLL —

What is your preferred way to vote?

10/21/2026

Get in the game, believers.

“What we don't need, Christians, is sitting on the bench. Or not even in the stadium, not even tailgating. We need them on the field, either on offense or defense." --Tim Echols

Your community, your state, your nation need you to pray, vote, and stand for biblical truth.

How? We can help. Consider becoming a part of a local Pray Vote Stand Chapter. Comment "CHAPTER" for more info.

Join with other believers and get in the game!

Watch the discussion with FRC President Tony Perkins on YouTube, Rumble, and the Stand Firm app.

Democrats in Congress recently unveiled their health care priorities for the upcoming 120th Congress should they win bac...
10/21/2026

Democrats in Congress recently unveiled their health care priorities for the upcoming 120th Congress should they win back the majority in November. Unsurprisingly, abortion remains a top priority for the caucus. They would be seeking to establish a national right to abortion, mandate and expand health insurance coverage for abortion, and lift any restrictions on government funding. Twenty-one states have no protections for unborn life whatsoever, and the Biden era’s abortion-by-mail policy remains in effect, resulting in abortion drugs being shipped into every state, including those with strong pro-life laws. But it seems that, for Democrats, this isn’t enough — there’s more anti-life work to be done.

Health insurance coverage is the subject of many of the bills on the proposed agenda, and this includes the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance Act. This bill would mandate health insurance coverage of abortion across all government programs and supersede other laws limiting abortion coverage or funding, such as the Hyde Amendment. The bill specifically exempts itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993 law that prohibits the government from placing a substantial burden on a person’s exercise of religion. This would mean that Americans across the country would be forced to pay into plans that cover elective abortion and would not be able to sue the government, even if they have a sincere religious objection.

Democrats would also be looking to revive — and even expand — expired enhancements to Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, which fund abortions and gender transition procedures. A recent GAO report confirmed that over a quarter of all Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) under the ACA cover elective abortion, covering an estimated 4.4 million individuals, and we know that some health plans require coverage of gender transition procedures as “medically necessary” despite the lack of evidence supporting them.

These COVID-era enhancements had temporarily increased the amounts the government had been paying towards enrollee’s health insurance premiums and made more people eligible. While the subsidies still exist, the expansion expired at the end of 2025, despite the Democrats’ (and some Republicans’) best efforts. If the Democrats take back the House, they would be looking to bring up the so-called Protecting Healthcare and Lowering Costs Act of 2025, which would again expand funding and eligibility for the ACA subsidies.

Other measures, such as the Bridge to Medicaid Act and the Medicare-X Choice Act, also include provisions to expand these subsidies, thereby increasing funding for abortions and gender transition procedures, including for minors.

Another way the Democrats would be aiming to increase federal funding of abortion would be through the Expanding Access to Family Planning Act, which would increase funding for the Title X Family Planning Program and lock in this funding for the next 10 years, rather than have the funding be subject to the annual appropriations process as it is now. This bill includes funding for clinics receiving Title X funds, which includes Planned Parenthood affiliates, and it requires that all pregnancy counseling present abortion as an option.

As if this were not enough, the Democratic Party will seek to establish federal rights to contraception, IVF, and abortion, all of which could put state regulations and pro-life protections in jeopardy. The Right to Contraception Act’s vague language could be used to overturn commonsense conscience and parental consent laws and guarantee a right to contraceptives that can act as abortifacients. The Right to IVF Act claims to establish a statutory right to “fertility treatments,” including Artificial Reproductive Technology (ART), broadly defined.

In reality, this bill package could lead to the legalization of practices such as human cloning, gene-editing, and the creation of three-parent embryos, as well as the creation of human-animal chimeras and other forms of human embryo experimentation. This bill package would fund ART procedures for servicemembers and veterans (including same-sex and unmarried couples) with taxpayer dollars and mandate insurance coverage of ART procedures nationwide.

But it is the so-called Women’s Health Protection Act that is the Democrats’ crown jewel. It would prohibit the federal government from restricting access to abortion and would establish a federal right to abortion before viability, though an abortionist would be given latitude to decide if an abortion is necessary beyond viability to protect the woman’s life or “health.” The term “health” is not defined, which could be used to allow abortion for any reason, such as mental health.

The bill also declares that it is not subject to pro-life laws, pre-abortion or post-abortion testing, informed consent, abortion facility requirements, or other pro-life protections. It would give abortion a status that no other medical procedure has. It would legalize abortion across the country for any reason and, possibly, at any point in pregnancy.

The bill further includes a specific right to travel across state lines to obtain an abortion, and it exempts itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which would have a chilling effect on the conscience rights of medical professionals, employers, nonprofits, and everyday Americans in various contexts.

The Democrats’ agenda is radical, but unfortunately, not surprising. They are being upfront as to where their priorities are. Now, it’s up to American voters to decide whether to accept their anti-life agenda. If the thought of living in a country with a federal statutory right to abortion, abortion-on-demand for any reason, paid for by the taxpayer, with no room for conscientious objections concerns you, make your voice heard at the ballot box.

𝑊𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙 𝐻𝑜𝑦𝑡, 𝑆𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝐿𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝐹𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ 𝐶𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑙. 𝑃𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

10/21/2026

📖 Today's Stand on the Word devotional.

Shameful.
10/21/2026

Shameful.

Late last week, Christianity Today, formerly the flagship publication for American evangelicalism, published, deleted, and republished an article suggesting tha

Our statement on President Trump's Executive Order for women's health.
10/20/2026

Our statement on President Trump's Executive Order for women's health.

A settlement has been reached in the fight for religious liberty in the case of LifeWise Academy against the Everett Pub...
10/20/2026

A settlement has been reached in the fight for religious liberty in the case of LifeWise Academy against the Everett Public School District in Washington state. In December 2025, the Christian nonprofit that seeks to evangelize to public school students through a release time program sued the school district after it established various oppressive limitations to its venture.

The settlement will require the Board Everett Public Schools Board of Directors to undergo religious liberty training, make changes to the district’s policies governing religious activities, issue a public written apology for its actions visible for six months, and pay $275,000 in attorney’s fees, according to an October 13 press release by First Liberty Institute.

Holly Randall, counsel at First Liberty Institute, the firm that defended LifeWise, detailed the ministry’s road to justice during a Friday appearance on “Washington Watch.”

“[The LifeWise] program allows students to attend Bible education classes on a voluntary basis during school hours, provided that they take place off school property. So, it all happens sort of pursuant to a Supreme Court decision from 1952. This is long been the law,” Randall said. “The program at Everett was operating successfully, but then the school started implementing different burdensome restrictions and sort of obstacles to its operation. So, they implemented a permission slip process that was incredibly burdensome for parents.”

Randall shared that the district also prohibited LifeWise from participating in community affairs with other organizations.

“And it required students to pack up their Bible and other religious literature they were given at LifeWise in sealed packages to take back to school, and they were unable to access them during class even if it was an appropriate free reading time. So, they were just adding challenges to the program that we saw as sort of unconstitutional obstacles that the school district was putting in LifeWise’s way,” Randall elaborated.

She further explained that just because a student is on public school property doesn’t mean they don’t have the right to religious liberties. “You don’t shed your constitutional rights when you enter the schoolhouse gate. That’s another long settled Supreme Court law. … The school was restricting the exercise of students and parents’ constitutional rights to direct the religious upbringing of their children.”

In April 2026, a federal judge in Washington issued a preliminary injunction against Everett schools, a ruling that was good news for LifeWise. “So, that’s how we’ve arrived at where we’re at now, which is the district acknowledging it’s probably wise to settle this and eliminate some of those burdens that are happening to the LifeWise program,” Randall clarified.

Randall went on to recall one of the most remarkable aspects of the case was the Everett school board’s unfriendliness towards LifeWise. “The judge’s order on the preliminary injunction was that the statements board members were making while at board meetings were expressing hostility toward LifeWise. And then they were taking actions that reflected that hostility.”

“The apology that the school district is being required to make, [and] the attorneys’ fees they’re being required to pay are really a reflection that school board members can’t just say whatever they want from the dais, express that hostility, take hostile actions, and get away with it. So, we’re hoping that this sends a message to board members across the country that they need to be careful when they’re speaking about religious organizations and treat them equally, not with hostility.”

Randall concluded by observing that the students who participate in LifeWise are the true heroes of the story.

“The students that attend that program are really the brave ones in this situation,” asserted Randall. “They are the type of students we want to be able to bring more Bible education to and expand their access. … The impact of a student in elementary, middle, or high school, hearing the word of God can only lead to life change and good.”

𝑊𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑛 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟. 𝑃𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

If it has been on your heart or bucket list to travel to Israel, we’d love for you to join us next spring! View the itin...
10/20/2026

If it has been on your heart or bucket list to travel to Israel, we’d love for you to join us next spring!

View the itinerary & prices: inspirationtravel.com/frc

With America’s and the globe’s fertility rate currently sagging to a historic low, a new survey data analysis has found ...
10/20/2026

With America’s and the globe’s fertility rate currently sagging to a historic low, a new survey data analysis has found that supportive friends and family, the influence of pro-natal celebrities, and an active religious life are all major contributors to boosting birth rates and helping couples achieve their desired family size.

In an extensive new report released Tuesday by the Institute for Family Studies (IFS), authors Lyman Stone, Peter Foreshaw Brookes, and Jason S. Carroll analyzed survey data taken from 10,000 respondents across over a dozen countries, asking about “a wide range of family attitudes” including peer and family influence, desirable family size, celebrity influences, religious practices, and other factors.

The results revealed that the influence of family and friends is enormously important to how many children couples have. When people feel supported and encouraged by family members, they “desire, intend to have, and actually have more children,” IFS found, noting that parental encouragement “is associated with an 11% increase in desired number of children and a 30% increase in the likelihood of intending to have another one.” Similar outcomes were also found when they felt supported by peers, which was “associated with a 10% increase in desired number of children and a 20% increase in the likelihood of intending to have another child.”

The survey further found a surprisingly high level of influence that celebrity culture has on family size. In countries where admired celebrities had more children, the general public also had more children. For instance, in Israel and Egypt, “the typical admired celebrities have more than 2.5 children,” which corresponds to Israel’s fertility rate of 2.86 and Egypt’s rate of 2.33. Whereas the average admired celebrity in Japan has one child and in South Korea has 1.7, which corresponds with both Japan’s (1.14) and South Korea’s (0.99) fertility rates. As the authors observed, “[T]he fertility and family patterns of celebrities, politicians, athletes, influencers, and other public figures is very likely to shape the desires, intentions, and — ultimately — the behaviors of their young admirers.”

In results that mirrored prior research, the report also found that the more religious a person is, the more children they tended to have. Data showed that “Being in the top third of respondents in religiosity is associated with having 9% more children than other respondents, with positive effects showing up in many countries.” This segment of believers was also “associated with desire for more kids (+15%) and a higher likelihood of intending to have another child (+12%).” IFS also found that “people in religious communities do expect more support from their friends.”

The report’s authors conclude by pointing out that in every country surveyed (with the exception of Israel), “actual fertility rates are lower than respondents said would make them happiest.” In order to help couples achieve their desired family size, the report offers a series of recommendations for how family members, friends, religious leaders and communities, and policymakers can encourage larger families. They urge grandparents to express to their adult children “the joys of early parenthood and offer to help them” and “gently encourage” cohabitating adult children to get married. They further recommend for friends to invite their childless friends into their lives and “lend emotional and instrumental support” to their friends who are considering having more children.

As for religious leaders and communities, the authors suggest positive preaching on family life and children, reinforcement of “whatever supportive family norms already exist,” and facilitating “supportive outreach and ministries for having more children or that make it easier to have them.”

Meanwhile, the IFS report encourages policymakers to put forward cultural messaging that “emphasize[s] the joy of children” and to “protect human togetherness” by “carv[ing] out space for in-person social relationships.” This could include “federal holiday expansions,” “improvements to public parks, [and] strict policing of public disorder in public spaces that discourages their use by families.” They further endorse “more generous unemployment insurance coverage” to help ease young people’s financial anxiety and making public spaces more kid-friendly, for example by adding “large, well-equipped, high-quality playgrounds or ‘family lounges’” to airports.

The authors also advise policymakers to take seriously research that shows that “remote work can boost birth rates and employee satisfaction.” “Restructuring remote work as an explicit ‘benefit for family,’ similar to parental leave, may be the best choice for parents and non-parents alike,” the report argues. “Likewise, setting aside some child care subsidies specifically for ‘on-site day cares’ for large employers, enabling working parents to visit their children freely throughout the day” is an additional way the authors contend could “transform child care” to being more family friendly.

Lyman Stone, a co-author of the report who serves as senior fellow and director of the Pronatalism Initiative at the Institute for Family Studies, thinks that the survey results powerfully illustrate the societal influences that shape the decisions that individuals make about having children.

“Policymakers often focus on the finances of fertility, but our work shows they may need to focus on the friends, the family, and the famous people just as much,” he told The Washington Stand. “People have the families their societies tell them are good to have.”

𝑊𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝐷𝑎𝑛 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑡. 𝑃𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

Join the nationwide prayer effort leading up to the election.
10/20/2026

Join the nationwide prayer effort leading up to the election.

We need a nation that will return wholeheartedly to God. And we need leaders who will do the same.

Join in national, daily prayer leading up to this important midterm election. Link below.

Address

801 G Street NW
Washington D.C., DC
20001

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Family Research Council posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Family Research Council:

Shortcuts

Sponsored

Share