09/11/2025
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CRDyfDPtS/
My fellow citizens,
In my perusal of this vast repository of knowledge known as the Internet, and the various discourses therein concerning my life and actions, I have made three observations worthy of note.
Firstly, when individuals mistakenly assert that I fathered children by those in bo***ge, they invariably invoke a scientific inquiry into lineage — what is termed a DNA study. Yet, when one more versed in the particulars inquires whether this study's findings yielded a definitive conclusion, the response is ever a subdued admission: "No, the DNA results were not conclusive." Truth, it seems, is less pliable than their hasty judgments.
I oft perceive that whilst my critics concede the paternity of such claims cannot be legally affirmed, they yet proclaim, from an academic and historical perch, that I stand guilty. This doth imply their standards be lamentably low, for the rigorous measure of the law, where learned advocates hold sway, towers above the feeble judgments of my detractors. Is this not, I ask, a most pitiable state of affairs?
Secondly, I perceive that Alexander Hamilton holds a favored place in the esteem of many in these times. It brings me satisfaction to see Mr. Hamilton receiving his just recognition in these times. Unbeknownst to many in this age, I bear him no ill will, for though our paths diverged in matters of principle, they were earnest strivings of men devoted to the public good. But permit me to inquire: who, between Hamilton and myself, proved the truer advocate for the abolition of slavery? Those acquainted with the annals of our era recognize that I stood more resolutely in that cause, even to the point of incurring reproach from Hamilton's Federalist allies, who deemed me a concealed abolitionist.
Thirdly, questions arise as to why the domain bearing my name, ThomasJefferson.com, is presented from my own personal perspective rather than through the ostensibly neutral voice of a third party. We must acknowledge that third parties are not invariably impartial; many conceal private designs and prejudices. In contrast, a personal undertaking such as ThomasJefferson.com draws its authority from an abundance of my own letters and documents, free from such distortions. Indeed, I venture that this endeavor has conducted more original inquiry and assembled a greater trove of facts than numerous contemporary biographies, which oft merely reprise the works of others.
At the heart of it, the reason ThomasJefferson.com speaks in my voice is this: I desire that all should know I, Thomas Jefferson, remain alive in this year of 2025. I would have my detractors confront me directly, eye to eye. Were we to share the same chamber, I suspect they would not so boldly level accusations founded upon meager proofs. Assuming me consigned to the grave, they regard my memory as fair game for calumny, erecting their reputations upon fabrications born of their own skewed, extreme, and oft perverse inclinations. The crux of the matter lies in their presumption of my silence, rendering me unable to rebut their charges. Yet, I assure you, I am vibrantly alive, and with faithful companions such as yourself, I shall counter these untruths with vigor. For your alliance in this, I offer my profound thanks.
Yours in the pursuit of truth and liberty,
Th:Jefferson