Cato Trade

Cato Trade The Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies provides objective and thought-provoking analysis on timely and ongoing trade debates. economy
5.

The Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies is committed to the research, production, and dissemination of top-quality, non-partisan policy ideas that are consistent with the view that people are more likely to flourish and reach their fullest potential in societies where there are free markets, individual liberty, and limited government. The Center aims to increase pub

lic understanding of the benefits of free trade and the costs of protectionism and its scholarship underscores the point that “real” free trade requires elimination of domestic barriers to trade and that foreign barriers are not compelling excuses for our own. Our views are properly characterized as “pro-market,” as opposed to what might be considered “pro-business.” The purpose of trade is not to achieve a surplus of exports over imports, as suggested by the establishment, neo-mercantilist, pro-business perspective, but to enable greater specialization, which yields faster economic growth and greater wealth creation. The scholarship of the Center is committed to refuting common myths that misinform the public’s understanding of trade, including especially persistent fallacies such as:

1. Trade is a competition between “Us” and “Them”
2. The trade deficit means the United States is losing at trade
3. Trade only benefits big business and the rich
4. Foreign “outsourcing” hurts the U.S. Trade and globalization caused U.S. manufacturing decline
6. Globalization has spurred a “race to the bottom” in labor, environmental
and consumer safety standards.
7. The WTO is an anti-American institution that undermines U.S. sovereignty.
8. Free trade is not fair trade
9. Free trade agreements are all about free trade
10. Unilateral trade liberalization is akin to unilateral disarmament

When people are free to buy from, sell to, and invest with one another as they choose, they can achieve far more than when governments attempt to control economic decisions. Widening the circle of people with whom we transact—including across political borders—brings benefits to consumers in the form of lower prices, greater variety, and better quality, and it allows companies to reap the benefits of innovation, specialization, and economies of scale that larger markets bring. Free markets are essential to prosperity, and expanding free markets as much as possible enhances that prosperity.

Colin Grabow: If the Biden administration blames a lack of competition in international ocean shipping for rising prices...
12/07/2021

Colin Grabow: If the Biden administration blames a lack of competition in international ocean shipping for rising prices, why does it support the Jones Act, which squelches competition and drives up freight rates in domestic ocean shipping?

If the Biden administration wants to get serious about promoting ocean shipping competition and driving down freight rates, a logical starting point should be revisiting the costly Jones Act.

"If China and the United States are not both fully engaged in restoring the centrality of the WTO and modernizing it to ...
12/07/2021

"If China and the United States are not both fully engaged in restoring the centrality of the WTO and modernizing it to make it fully fit for purpose in the twenty‐first century, then the next twenty years of Chinese and American membership in the institution may well witness its decline into an afterthought on the margins of the world economy."

James Bacchus explains why WTO negotiations cannot succeed unless both the United States' and Chinas' concerns are on the agenda.

US concerns cannot be resolved unless Chinese concerns are, too.

Transshipment — transfer of cargo from one vessel to another before it is brought to its final destination — does not ta...
12/07/2021

Transshipment — transfer of cargo from one vessel to another before it is brought to its final destination — does not take place within the United States because any goods moved between U.S. ports must use expensive and uncompetitive Jones Act shipping.

This lack of transshipment extends to Puerto Rico. Colin Grabow explains why it represents a missed economic opportunity for the island.

The Jones Act has heavily contributed to the lack of transshipment in U.S. ports. That’s a missed opportunity for Puerto Rico.

LISTEN: Scott Lincicome discusses industrial policy on Law & Liberty's "Liberty Law Talk" podcast. https://bit.ly/3xToMa...
12/06/2021

LISTEN: Scott Lincicome discusses industrial policy on Law & Liberty's "Liberty Law Talk" podcast. https://bit.ly/3xToMaL

November 30, 2021

Recent U.S. port bottlenecks have revealed myriad systemic policy problems affecting U.S. coastal shipping. These proble...
12/06/2021

Recent U.S. port bottlenecks have revealed myriad systemic policy problems affecting U.S. coastal shipping. These problems include restrictive labor, immigration, and trade policies. Policymakers looking to improve U.S. port efficiency should look at how to fix these bad policies before considering more regulations, writes Gabriella Beaumont-Smith.

Policymakers would do well to reduce rather than increase regulatory burden, which has artificially restricted essential inputs for port efficiency. Unfortunately, the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of…

"Buried in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (aka the “bipartisan infrastructure bill”) is tens of billions of ...
12/06/2021

"Buried in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (aka the “bipartisan infrastructure bill”) is tens of billions of taxpayer dollars for subsidies to renewable energy companies, with little regard, it seems, for the bad economics and history of this kind of “green industrial policy” in the United States," writes Scott Lincicome.

There are plenty of subsidies for renewable energy companies in the infrastructure bill that just passed the Senate.

"If the G7 countries do not act together in the WTO to reconstitute the appellate body, and if nothing changes, China an...
12/06/2021

"If the G7 countries do not act together in the WTO to reconstitute the appellate body, and if nothing changes, China and other large trading countries will simply employ the heft of their economic leverage to do as they wish in their trade dealings with other countries — and especially those that are smaller and less powerful."

James Bacchus warns that without a functioning WTO dispute settlement system, "the security of the rule of law in international trade will give way once more to the chaos of the rule of power."

This dire situation in WTO dispute settlement is not the fault of either China or Australia. It is almost entirely the fault of the United States of America.

"Before overreacting with counterproductive policies that would raise [shipping] prices even further, policymakers need ...
12/06/2021

"Before overreacting with counterproductive policies that would raise [shipping] prices even further, policymakers need to take a deep breath and understand the economic forces at play," writes Gabriella Beaumont-Smith.

Businesses are facing higher shipping costs because ocean carriers are increasing their prices in reaction to current increased demand and limited supply. These changes in demand are driven by…

"In reality, industrial policy, as properly defined, has an extensive and underwhelming history in the United States, fe...
12/05/2021

"In reality, industrial policy, as properly defined, has an extensive and underwhelming history in the United States, featuring both seen and unseen high costs, failed objectives, and political manipulation."

The United States should reject industrial policy.

The United States undoubtedly faces economic and geopolitical challenges, including ones related to China, but the solution does not lie in copying China’s top‐down economic planning.

Supply chain disruptions have many causes. The solutions are similarly manifold. Colin Grabow joins the Cato Daily Podca...
12/05/2021

Supply chain disruptions have many causes. The solutions are similarly manifold. Colin Grabow joins the Cato Daily Podcast to detail how rules within federal control have contributed to the slow and expensive movement of goods.

Featuring Colin Grabow and Caleb O. Brown

"Policies that prioritize and protect narrow political interests over broader, national ones surely didn’t cause the sup...
12/05/2021

"Policies that prioritize and protect narrow political interests over broader, national ones surely didn’t cause the supply chain crisis, but they just as surely exacerbated the situation. Reforming those policies isn’t easy... But doing so would go a long way toward not only having a supply chain less vulnerable to future shocks but also breaking through the broader American sclerosis." -- Scott Lincicome

A mix of federal, state, and local regulatory policies are behind our supply‐chain woes.

Inu Manak: "What is important, for the time being, is that the United States is engaging with our allies on [the issue o...
12/05/2021

Inu Manak: "What is important, for the time being, is that the United States is engaging with our allies on [the issue of subsidies reform] because they are just as impacted by China’s behavior as we are."

It is important that the United States not go it alone, not least because having more countries on board that support overall reform efforts could encourage China to accept some difficult changes to…

Address

1000 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington D.C., DC
20001

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Cato Trade posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Featured

Share