Society for the Rule of Law

Society for the Rule of Law We are a group of attorneys who would traditionally be considered conservative or libertarian. Founding Members: Jonathan H. Adler | Donald B. Ayer | C. Verret

We believe in the rule of law, the power of truth, and that these principles apply regardless of the party or persons in power. Frederick Beckner III | John B. Bellinger, III | Phillip D. Brady | Robert M. Chesney | George T. Conway III | Carrie F. Cordero | Charles Fried | Stuart M. Gerson | Peter D. Keisler | Orin S. Kerr | Edward J. Larson | Marisa C. Maleck | Irina D. Manta | John M. Mitnick |

Trevor Potter | Alan Charles Raul | Tom Ridge | Jonathan C. Rose | Paul Rosenzweig | Erin L. Sheley | Ilya Somin | J.W.

The debate over birthright citizenship is back.But what does the Constitution actually say?Our Charter Member Keith Whit...
06/16/2026

The debate over birthright citizenship is back.

But what does the Constitution actually say?

Our Charter Member Keith Whittington examines the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment - and its ties to English Common Law - and explains why children born in the United States are citizens, subject only to narrow historical exceptions.

Read more:

Our Charter Member's new paper explores the English common law origins of American birthright citizenship.

The Senate's constitutional duty is to ensure that the Department of Justice remains committed to equal justice under la...
06/15/2026

The Senate's constitutional duty is to ensure that the Department of Justice remains committed to equal justice under law—not political loyalty.

Today, the Society for the Rule of Law Institute submitted a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee opposing Todd Blanche's nomination as Attorney General.

Read our letter:

The Attorney General should demonstrate a commitment to the Rule of Law and impartial stewardship.

06/12/2026

“State and local prosecutors face serious constitutional and practical obstacles to bringing criminal cases against federal officials who violate the law.”

Jonathan Wroblewski discusses the constitutional challenges of accountability and the role of state and local governments in federal immunity cases in our latest webinar:

06/12/2026

How do we assess the current state of legal immunity from suit for federal law enforcement officers? What are the constitutional bases and legal history behind the status quo? Do we need reform?

Under the current U.S. legal framework, federal officials retain almost complete immunity from personal liability for violating someone's constitutional rights. Traditionally, the federal government has been the final backstop against constitutional abuses, and federal law has been designed to defend against violations by state actors. Recently, that relationship has inverted: state law has taken a lead role in responding to constitutional violations, and these responses have begun to include state-created accountability for federal officials. Recent immigration enforcement activity, particularly in Minnesota, has only brightened the spotlight on this critical and contentious constitutional question.

How can the U.S. guarantee the fundamental rights of Americans and ensure accountability for federal officials? How can states best serve this mission, while respecting the boundaries of federalism and maintaining collaborative relationships with federal law enforcement? How can states protect the constitutional rights of their citizens from excessive force, without compromising the ability of law enforcement to do its job?

Join us on Friday, June 12, at 12:00 PM ET for a discussion of these questions, the legal and constitutional questions they invoke, and what potential next steps in oversight or accountability exist.

To discuss this important topic, our webinar will feature:

Anya Bidwell, a Senior Attorney and the leader of the Project on Immunity and Accountability, Institute for Justice.

Rafael Mangual, the Nick Ohnell Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a member of the Council on Criminal Justice.

Jonathan Wroblewski, former Director of the Office of Policy and Legislation at the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice and current Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School.

Gregg Nunziata, the Society’s Executive Director, who will serve as moderator.

This webinar was approved for CLE credit for live viewers in Florida, Illinois, and Texas. Attorneys practicing law in other states were also able to get CLE credit, subject to the rules of their particular state.

This event will be on the record and open to press; for media inquiries, please contact [email protected].

Can states hold federal law enforcement officers accountable for constitutional violations? What happens when state-crea...
06/11/2026

Can states hold federal law enforcement officers accountable for constitutional violations? What happens when state-created remedies collide with federal immunity doctrines?

Join us here on Facebook tomorrow at 12 PM ET for a timely discussion on federal immunity, constitutional accountability, and the future of federalism.

CLE credit available in Florida, Illinois, and Texas.

Does a controversial Supreme Court decision justify court-packing?Society for the Rule of Law Advisory Council member Il...
06/11/2026

Does a controversial Supreme Court decision justify court-packing?

Society for the Rule of Law Advisory Council member Ilya Somin says no—and argues that expanding the Court would weaken judicial review, accelerate partisan escalation, and ultimately undermine constitutional limits on government power.

Read more:

Court packing is a dangerous idea that both parties should reject.

Address

Washington D.C., DC
20005

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Society for the Rule of Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Society for the Rule of Law:

Featured

Share