04/29/2026
We were preparing to travel to Lusaka for —the world’s leading summit on human rights in the digital age—along with hundreds of others. Days before it was set to begin, the Zambian government “postponed” it.
RightsCon isn’t a small gathering. It brings together civil society, governments, and technologists from around the world to “build strategies and drive forward change toward a more free, open, and connected world.”
The Government of Zambia’s explanation? Vague references to “security concerns,” “alignment,” and “further consultations.” No specifics. No timeline. No clarity.
You don’t delay a global human rights convening days before it begins without consequences. Flights booked. Visas issued. Sessions set. This isn’t a scheduling issue.
I’ve seen this before.
“Security” is one of the most effective ways to restrict freedom without saying so.
Clean. Bureaucratic. Hard to contest. This is how civic space gets managed now. Not always through bans—but through delays, ambiguity, and last-minute decisions that make gathering impossible.
If this is about “security,” the public deserves specifics.
If it’s not, the public deserves honesty.
This isn’t procedural.
It’s political.