04/24/2026
As the House debates the extent of domestic surveillance of the American people under FISA Section 702, our representatives should note a breaking story: that has investigated and its employees for years. Of course, no one is above the law and anyone who appears to have committed a crime can be investigated, but the fact pattern is what has historically characterized politically motivated surveillance.
Cato fellow Patrick Eddington writes: "These are two distinct but reinforcing problems: an active criminal investigation running in parallel with classified intelligence collection, both shielded from disclosure, both targeting a prominent First Amendment organization, with no public prosecutorial output to show for it"
Many on the left also complain that the FBI has subjected their First Amendment organizations to undue scrutiny. Something to think about before the House accepts a rule that would allow no reform amendments to the Section 702 surveillance authority.
As the House debates the extent of domestic surveillance of the American people under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, our representatives should note a breaking story –...