International Criminal Court Alliance

International Criminal Court Alliance The ICC Alliance promotes participation by all nations with the International Criminal Court, accountability for atrocity crimes, & Peace through Justice!

05/15/2026

US District Court grants preliminary injunction against sanctions order against experts Francesca Albanese for recommending action by the International Criminal Court. District of Columbia, case 26-288 (RJL) May 13 2026.https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.289767/gov.uscourts.dcd.289767.48.0.pdf

04/24/2026

April 24 is Armenian Genocide Rememberance Day. Los Angeles is blessed with families that immigrated here and Glendale is about 40% folks of Armenian ancestory. We should all honor the survivors who lost parts of thier families and society over a century ago. To honor them each of us should take whatever steps we can to prevent those types of criimes from continuing to occur. The most important factor for peace is trust and trust happens from one on one relationships. Spread the idea of peace through justice.

08/25/2025

Second court enjoins enforcement of ICC sanctions executive order against two professors.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/federal-judge-blocks-enforcement-of-trump-s-order-on-international-criminal-court/a...
07/19/2025

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/federal-judge-blocks-enforcement-of-trump-s-order-on-international-criminal-court/ar-AA1ISZ4d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=c46cb368afd8433594282b6097b8c3e9&ei=15

A federal judge blocked on Friday the enforcement of US President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting those who work with the International Criminal Court. The ruling follows an April lawsuit by two human rights advocates challenging Trump’s February 6 order authorizing potentially far-reac...

05/16/2025

State Bar Board Approves Statement on Recent Federal Executive Actions Threatening the Availability of Legal Counsel and the Rule of Law
As many of you are aware, in recent weeks, the federal government has issued executive orders targeting law firms based on their representation of clients and positions unpopular with the current administration. At its recent May 9, 2025, meeting, the Board of Trustees approved the release of a statement on such actions, which threaten the availability of legal counsel and the rule of law. The Board also authorized amicus participation in lawsuits challenging the executive orders.
Please see the Board of Trustees' full statement below.
To State Bar licensees and the public we serve:
The State Bar of California exists to protect the public through the licensing, regulation and discipline of attorneys; the advancement of the ethical and competent practice of law; and supporting efforts for greater access to, and inclusion in, the legal system. In carrying out its duties, the State Bar of California acts in accordance with certain fundamental principles that define the legal profession and are central to the State Bar’s mission:
Attorneys have an ethical duty to provide competent and diligent representation to clients, regardless of how unpopular or controversial their causes may be.
Attorneys must exercise independent professional judgment, free from external pressures or influences that might compromise their representation.
Attorneys must not reject, based on personal considerations, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed.
All attorneys swear an oath to uphold the United States and California Constitutions, and to faithfully discharge the duties of an attorney to the best of their knowledge and ability.
In both the federal and state legal systems, courts determine the meaning of the law, and all attorneys, including those in other branches of the government, have an obligation to comply with court orders.
These core principles, embodied in our Rules of Professional Conduct and the State Bar Act, are not merely aspirational—they are essential to the rule of law and the administration of justice.
When any action, regardless of its source, discourages or penalizes attorneys for representing certain clients or causes, it raises serious concerns about the ability of the legal profession to fulfill its obligations. The independence of the legal profession is a cornerstone of our justice system.
Recent actions of the current federal administration’s executive branch (the Administration) threaten these core principles. The Administration has taken actions against law firms, including through executive orders against certain law firms and negotiations that have resulted in agreements with others, based on those law firms’ representation of clients and positions unpopular with the Administration. Many of the representations criticized by the Administration are matters undertaken on a pro bono basis for indigent individuals, such as providing immigration legal services.
The Administration’s actions have included directions to government agencies to revoke law firm employees’ security clearances, limit access to federal buildings and employees, refrain from hiring law firm employees, and require federal contractors to disclose any business with targeted law firms.
Such actions directly imperil the ability of lawyers at these firms to competently represent their clients and have a chilling effect on the availability of competent legal counsel to represent clients unpopular with the Administration. This effect may be particularly harmful for those who lack economic means and rely on pro bono representation to access legal services. The threat to the legal system of these actions targeting law firms is such that United States District Court Judge Beryl Howell on May 2, 2025, permanently enjoined enforcement of an executive order issued against a law firm “to protect the independence of counsel to represent their clients vigorously and zealously, without fear of retribution from the government simply for doing the job of a lawyer.”
The State Bar reaffirms that all lawyers must be permitted to exercise their professional judgment and ethical duties without fear of reprisal. This position is not partisan but foundational to the advancement of ethical and competent practice of law and the preservation of the rule of law.
The State Bar encourages California attorneys, consistent with their oath to uphold the United States and California Constitutions, and to faithfully discharge their duties as attorneys, to speak out in support of the right to and availability of competent legal counsel to all and of the rule of law.
This statement is made on behalf of the State Bar of California, a state government agency. It is not intended to represent the views of any individual licensees of the State Bar of California.

04/24/2025

April 24 is the day to remember the victims and survivors of the Armenian genocide. The world still needs the ICC to combat current atrocity crimes.

01/06/2025

We’ve joined 75 human rights organizations, faith-based groups, legal associations, and academic institutions in an open letter to Congress and the incoming US Presidential administration, condemning sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC). As the House of Representatives is set to review this important legislation, we urge Members of Congress to consider the perspectives of the signatories, including constituents, allies, experts, and survivors from ICC situation countries. Together, we stand for justice and accountability.

Read the letter:

The undersigned organizations write to express grave concerns and to unequivocally oppose the use of the sanctions authority of the United States to attack the International Criminal Court (ICC), an independent judicial institution dedicated to combating impunity for the gravest crimes known to huma...

12/20/2024

Preserving the ICC’s Integrity: Why Sanctions Are Not the Solution to Disputes Sanctions against the ICC are not the proper solution to disagreements over which cases should go forward. In response to the application for warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant there have been calls in the US for sanctions against the ICC and/or some personnel of the ICC. The House of Representatives passed H.R. 8282, titled the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act and since the warrants were issued there are calls from some Senators to advance the legislation in the Senate. The Trump administration had imposed sanctions on personnel of the ICC who worked on the allegations related to US conduct in connection with the situation in Afghanistan. The Biden administration dropped those sanctions. The proposed sanctions would adversely affect not only the Palestine-Israel situation, but other cases, including those supported by the US. Congress authorized support for the ICC investigation regarding Ukraine. The US encouraged victims to serve as witnesses for situations in Sudan and Libya, both of which are UN referrals to the ICC made after votes by the UN Security Council. Sanctions would cause the ICC to be disconnected from the global financial system affecting witness protection programs supported by the US. Sanctions against individuals would result in those individuals being forced to use different information systems than those used by the rest of the ICC. The Biden administration opposed the legislation, pointing out that the US has better methods to register disagreements with the ICC than sanctions. An independent judiciary, free from political pressures, is a cornerstone to the effectiveness of all courts. The ICC and it's personnel should not be subjected to the political pressure when others disagree with decisions on whether or not there are reasonable grounds to believe crimes have been committed. All individuals against whom charges are pressed are presumed innocent and have rights to defend against the charges, including the assertion that complimentarity precludes ICC action because Israel is conducting a genuine investigation and, if necessary, it's own prosecution. It is not in the best interests of the US, of the ICC, or for accountability for atrocity crimes pursuant to the rule of law, for the US to impose sanctions on the ICC or its personnel.

09/21/2024

It's international day for peace! Too many places around the world living without peace. Try your best to promote peaceful resolution of disputes. Law not war. Peace through justice.

Address

5120 West Goldleaf Circle, Suite 380
Los Angeles, CA
90056

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 4pm
Tuesday 9am - 4pm
Wednesday 9am - 4pm
Thursday 9am - 4pm
Friday 9am - 3pm

Telephone

+13104730777

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when International Criminal Court Alliance posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to International Criminal Court Alliance:

Share