10/07/2026
The Census Bureau is proposing major changes to the 2030 Census—including excluding many noncitizen residents from the population used for congressional representation and eliminating race and ethnicity questions from the decennial census.
One of the Bureau’s stated reasons for reconsidering race and ethnicity data is the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which narrowed the standards for bringing vote-dilution claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
But that raises a fundamental problem: a more demanding evidentiary standard requires better evidence, not less.
Callais did not eliminate Section 2 or make race irrelevant. Courts still need evidence about race, geography, voting patterns, and discrimination to evaluate these claims. Removing one of the nation’s most comprehensive sources of granular racial demographic data could make those patterns harder—not easier—to establish.
That concern is part of a much larger shift. After years of federal efforts to improve data disaggregation and make historically overlooked communities more visible, the proposed rule would narrow who counts for representation, collect less demographic information through the universal census, and rely more heavily on government and commercial records to classify people.
In our public comment, CRDJ argues for a different direction: count every resident, preserve disaggregated demographic data, ensure transparent and accurate classification, protect the ACS as a complement—not a substitute—and keep data power accountable.
Because the Census is not just about counting people. It shapes who is represented, what disparities we can see, and what our democracy is able to know about itself.
Read CRDJ's public comment letter:https://37003b98-a009-4c51-ace1-9fd474d7709e.usrfiles.com/ugd/37003b_2e054d67e91b4800a85a2e837e54a10c.pdf
Comments on the proposed rule are due October 13, 2026.