09/15/2026
We know dynamic assessment can give us information that a static assessment often can't, particularly when we’re working with culturally and linguistically diverse students. It provides a better understanding of learning potential, responsiveness to support, and the difference between language and/or learning difference and disability.
So…why aren't more of us actually using it?
Is it…
👍 TIME — Ain't nobody got time for that!
❤️ TRAINING — What ta do? I understand the concept, but I need more support actually implementing it.
🤗 TOOLS — I don't have practical materials/protocols/resources that make it easy to use.
😂 DATA/REPORTING — I can do the assessment, but I'm not sure how to document or interpret the results.
😮 SYSTEMS — My workplace/school doesn't make room for it.
😢 CONFIDENCE — I need to see what “good” dynamic assessment actually looks like in practice.
😡 ALL OF THE ABOVE 😩
And before somebody says, “We just need more PD…” 😏
Maybe.
But what if the issue isn't simply knowing about dynamic assessment?
What if we need better ways to actually DO dynamic assessment?
That's something we've been thinking about at REACT.
So, I'm doing a little market research. 👀
If you could wave a magic wand and fix ONE thing that makes dynamic assessment difficult to implement, what would it be?
Feel free to share additional thoughts/details in the comments.
Because if we're serious about rethinking assessment and centering equity, we need to build the infrastructure that helps people move from “I know dynamic assessment matters” to “I can actually use it.”
And yes…
We're building.