10/29/2026
Here is a strong message from a doctor at Upland Hills, with four kids in the Dodgeville schools.
🧡 🧡 🧡 🧡 🧡
Dear Editor,
I am a local physician who grew up a Dodger. I have four kids in the district right now, and I was struggling to understand why the district needs to go to referendum for their operating budget. I spent time researching WI school funding history and our district’s situation. Please allow me to share what has brought me to the conclusion that voting no to this school referendum will only lead to greater increases in our taxes and dilute our control over this process in the future.
Since the 1990’s, there have been changes to school funding structure at the state level that continue to shift the burden of funding from the state to the individual districts. This has led to a record number of districts in WI going to operating referendums.
In 2024 alone, a record setting 241 districts in WI, about half of the public school districts in the state, voted on operating referenda (money to keep the doors open and lights on).
If half of the districts in the state are facing similar budgetary deficits, it becomes obvious this is not a Dodgeville district problem, but a systemic statewide issue.
To look at Dodgeville’s financial situation, I went to the last published 2025-26 WI Dept of Instruction data and compared mill rates of Mineral Point (8.22) and Barneveld (8.41) to Dodgeville (5.65). Dodgeville’s spending rate on schools is a full ⅓ less per $1,000 of taxable property value than the average of those two neighboring districts. Cysts to staff and programming cannot make up for this large gap in funding. We are looking at a solvency issue without additional tax revenue. Because of the current state funding structure for public schools, the only way to get additional revenue is to raise the mill rate. Until things change at the state level to keep funding in track with inflation, we must pass operating referenda. While all surrounding communities voted to keep their districts solvent in the last several years, the constituents of the Dodgeville district have repeatedly voted no to operating referenda, setting us up for failure.
Should we continue to vote no on operational spending gaps, we will eventually be forced to consolidate or dissolve our district.
Here is the part that matters: not having our own district doesn’t mean eliminating the mill rate on our property taxes. It means we will pay the mill rate for the district the children in this area are assigned to attend. Historically, which district children attend is not a choice left to its constituents, but one determined by annexing school districts and the capacity of those that surround us to absorb us. If our district has a debt, that debt will also be added to our mill rate. Essentially, anything we must borrow now to keep lights on we will have to pay later; even if it is with the consolidation or dissolution of our district. Our district’s constituents will pay higher costs and children will travel further to and from school.
In the November referendum, YES vote would bring the Dodgeville mill rate up to 6.95, which is still well below the neighboring communities of Mineral Point and Barneveld’s current rates.
And while the tax increase may feel unaffordable to many of us, a NO vote will degrade our community and lead to eventually higher mill rate hikes in which we will have much less control.
Voting YES on Nov 3rd is a vote for our children, for our community, and ultimately for our pocketbooks. This is an issue that should get all of us to the polls!
Emily Jewell
Dodgeville
References:
1. Wisconsin Policy Forum: Wisconsin sets more referenda records to fund schools, Focus #21 November 2024
2. Department of Public Instruction fiscal year 2025-2026 Equalized Levy Rates (Mill Rates) excel data sheets
3. School district reorganization informational paper #32 Legislative fiscal bureau State of WI, January 2021
🧡 🧡 🧡 🧡 🧡