03/11/2026
Softdrink production in Mauritius 🇲🇺 can raise two distinct environmental concerns: plastic pollution and the use of freshwater for industrial production. Both deserve public scrutiny, particularly on an island where reliable access to safe drinking water is essential.
However, it is important to distinguish between the environmental risks that are well established in general and any specific damage that has been demonstrated at a Coca-Cola production site in Mauritius.
1. Plastic pollution: a visible environmental problem
Plastic beverage bottles can contribute to:
Marine pollution and damage to coastal ecosystems.
Harm to fish, seabirds and other marine life.
Microplastic contamination as plastic breaks down.
Waste-management costs borne by local communities and taxpayers.
In Mauritius, where the marine environment is essential to tourism, fisheries and biodiversity, preventing plastic waste from reaching rivers, beaches and the ocean should be a priority.
The responsibility should not fall only on consumers. Beverage producers and distributors can also help by reducing unnecessary packaging, supporting effective bottle-return and recycling systems, and financing the collection of the packaging they put on the market.
2. Freshwater use: a potential risk to water security
Soft-drink production requires water as an ingredient. Additional water is generally needed for cleaning equipment, rinsing bottles, cooling and other factory operations.
This creates several questions for Mauritius:
Where does the factory obtain its water? Is it supplied by the public drinking-water network, a borehole, or another permitted source?
How much water does it consume? Total withdrawals matter, not just the water contained in the finished drinks.
Does production compete with household needs? This becomes particularly important during droughts, water restrictions and supply interruptions.
What happens to wastewater? Cleaning chemicals, sugars and other residues must be managed and treated appropriately before discharge.
Is the extraction sustainable? Excessive groundwater abstraction can potentially lower groundwater levels or contribute to saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers.
The crucial point is that using water to manufacture a soft drink does not automatically mean that a company is damaging Mauritius's drinking-water supply. The risk depends on its water source, the volume extracted, local water availability, wastewater treatment and the effectiveness of regulatory oversight.
3. What the published figures for Mauritius reveal
There is an important piece of local evidence. Phoenix Beverages published water-use figures in its 2024 annual report. The company reports that its production facilities obtain water mainly from local aquifers and monitor abstraction rates, water quality and groundwater recharge.
Phoenix Beverages — 2024 annual report
1,016,969 m³
Reported total water withdrawal during 2024, equivalent to approximately 1.02 billion litres.
4 litres
Approximately four litres of water withdrawn per litre of production, based on the report's overall water-use ratio of 0.40 m³ per hectolitre.
These are company-reported figures for Phoenix Beverages' operations, not a separately verified figure for Coca-Cola alone.
The report also describes rainwater harvesting at its Phoenix and Nouvelle France sites. It estimates that the Nouvelle France system reduces groundwater use by around 3,600 m³ annually. 
These figures do not prove that the company has depleted or contaminated drinking-water sources. They do, however, demonstrate why industrial water use deserves scrutiny in Mauritius.
Our recommendation for Mauritius 🇲🇺
Drinking water must take priority over non-essential industrial consumption. That is a reasonable principle for public policy, particularly where water resources are under pressure.
I would advocate for:
Mandatory public reporting of industrial water consumption and groundwater extraction.
Independent monitoring of aquifers near beverage factories.
Greater use of harvested rainwater and appropriately treated recycled water for cleaning and other non-drinking purposes.
Transparent wastewater testing and enforcement.
Stronger producer responsibility for plastic bottles, including effective collection and reuse systems.
The objective should not be to accuse a company without evidence. It should be to ensure that every company operating in Mauritius uses shared natural resources responsibly and is held to transparent environmental standards.
Mauritius must protect every drop of freshwater.
Beverage production can consume substantial quantities of water, while plastic bottles contribute to environmental pollution.
We must ask:
Are our groundwater resources being protected?
Is industrial water use sustainable?
Are companies accountable for their plastic waste?
Are our communities' drinking-water needs being prioritised?
Clean water is essential for life — not a resource we can afford to take for granted.
Extract from Google