21/10/2026
My heart goes out to the Federal MP who has been so brutally attacked, and to her family, as they face what must be an unimaginable and devastating time. I can only imagine the fear, pain and uncertainty they are experiencing. My thoughts are with them, and I wish them strength through this incredibly difficult time.
Having served in Parliament, I know what it feels like to be yelled at, stalked, threatened and personally attacked through written communications and online — by members of the community and political opponents. No one should have to endure this simply for serving their community.
While stronger security is essential, is it enough on its own?
Do we also need to examine the culture of politics itself. Are our parliamentary institutions doing enough to challenge hostility, personal attacks and intimidation, or are these adverserial behaviours normalised as robust debate and dismissed with the words, “That’s just politics” or "Don't take it personally".
I will always remember Question Time and the "robust" exchanges on display, often in front of school students in the public gallery. Our children form their beliefs from the world around them — what they hear, see and talk about. What are we teaching them about how to treat others and handle disagreement?
And how many capable people, with valuable lived experience and a genuine passion to make a difference, look at the way politics operates today and decide not to put their hand up for public office?
What perspectives, what voices and what potential solutions are we losing before these people even reach the decision-making table?
We must reflect not only on how we protect those who serve, but also on the behaviours our institutions model and tolerate, and whose participation those behaviours may be costing us.
This is not about limiting robust debate or legitimate political differences. It is about recognising that how we disagree matters, and that respect must remain fundamental to public life.
Disagreement is part of democracy. Disrespect does not have to be.
We must do better — for those who serve, for their families, and for the next generation watching us all.
