14/06/2023
Update of Court Proceedings 8th June 2023
On the 8th June the defence attorney for the accused indicated that he would not be calling any further witnesses. His last witness called was the private social worker his client had hired to do a pre-sentencing report as they were not happy with the state social workers report which recommended imprisonment. Since she testified, we have received the transcripts and there were a couple of things that stood out.
She recommended that the accused is suitable for house arrest. The accused currently lives with his sister and brother in-law. The prosecutor asked her if she knows if there are fi****ms in the house where he is living, she stated that there are no fi****ms. We are aware as we have checked and the brother in-law is the owner of two fi****ms, one of them a shotgun very similar to that of the accused’s father. She either did not ask the question or the accused’s sister lied to her. If the accused was placed under house arrest at his sister’s house what is to stop him from again stealing a firearm and shooting another innocent person. The correctional services official who was tasked with inspecting the house also did not think it was necessary to check if there were fi****ms kept in the house.
The second thing that stood out was when the private social worker was arguing that the accused was not ill-disciplined.
Private Social Worker: “in my field ill-discipline is getting involved in criminal activities”
Prosecutor: “like stealing your father’s gun from its safe and exposing people whilst you know full well the safety measures applicable to fi****ms. Exposing on numerous occasions, people to these fi****ms that he unlawfully had in his possession. Is that not criminal in your mind?
Private Social Worker: “That is ill-discipline”
Prosecutor: “Not Criminal?”
Private Social Worker: “Not in South Africa, not where we live, not where they live.”
The private social worker believes it is not CRIMINAL to steal fi****ms in South Africa.
In her report she also said that the accused had told her he had never experimented with any illegal substances.
The first state witness on the 8th stated that the accused had smoked ma*****na with him and had come to school high before departing for a rugby tour. He also received WhatsApp messages from the accused with a drug price list. This evidence was important to prove that the accused had not been truthful with the private social worker.
The second state witness was a teacher from the school the accused attended before enrolling at Josh’s school. She stated that the accused had several behaviour incidents whilst at the school and his parents were called in on more than one occasion to discuss his behaviour. One of the incidents that stood out was when the class were given a baby doll which they had to look after as if its was a live baby for several days, the accused put drawing pins in the eyes and mouth of the baby. The teacher found this very disturbing. This teacher was also part of the disciplinary hearing of the accused, the outcome was that his contract would not be renewed the following year.
The third state witness was also a teacher of the accused in grade 8 and grade 9. She stated that the accused took no accountability for his bad behaviour and was arrogant. She said the accused would often boast at school about having access to fi****ms at home at was allowed to shoot whatever he wanted whenever he wanted. She raised this with the principal and said she did not feel safe in the accused’s presence and that he was dangerous. She said if there was ever a kid that would have brought a gun to school it would have been the accused.
There is a pattern of ill-discipline with the accused, and he has not taken any accountability for his actions and showed no remorse. He was told he could not return to two private schools. The private schools do not do any checks or request any previous school records, had this been done the accused most likely would not have ended up in Josh’s school and Josh would have been alive today!
There are no more witnesses to be called, the prosecutor requested a postponement so that she can prepare her closing arguments in detail. The case will resume on the 14th July 2023
We also now believe we know who owns the missing shotgun, we can only hope the SAPS will take this information seriously. We believe the owner of this shotgun removed it from the scene on the day of the shooting.
We want to change the way private schools admit pupils without doing checks with the previous school, parents of kids at private schools have a false sense of security thinking that their kids are safe, in all private schools there are potentially drug dealers, sexual predators and in our case a KILLER mixing with innocent children. This needs to change before another life is lost.