Bonteheuwel Development Forum - BHDF

Bonteheuwel Development Forum  - BHDF Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Bonteheuwel Development Forum - BHDF, Non-Governmental Organization (NGO), 8 Jasmine Street, Bonteheuwel.

The Bonteheuwel Development Forum in short BDF, is a community based NGO consisting of street and block commintees that are tackling bread and butter issues of our community in the areas of safety, poverty, health, youth, women, food security, etc.

From Crisis Response to the Commons of Care: Building a Commons Economy from the Ground UpReflections from the Food Inda...
24/07/2026

From Crisis Response to the Commons of Care: Building a Commons Economy from the Ground Up

Reflections from the Food Indaba: Water, Food and the Coming Crisis: Lessons from Day Zero and Pathways to Resilience

For generations, women have carried the invisible infrastructure of our communities. We have stretched meals when there was not enough food. We have cared for children, older persons, neighbours and the sick. We have organised feeding schemes, planted gardens, supported families through hardship and held communities together during moments of crisis.

Yet this labour is rarely recognised as work.

It is often called volunteering. It is often called kindness. It is often expected as a natural responsibility of women.

But care is work.

Care creates social value. Care creates economic value. Care sustains life itself.

The Food Indaba reminded us that food, water, health and dignity are deeply connected. The crises of Day Zero and COVID-19 revealed the same truth: when systems are under pressure, communities organise. Communities do not simply wait for solutions. Communities create solutions.

During the Level 5 lockdown, the Bonteheuwel Development Forum (BDF) experienced this reality first-hand. We mobilised community networks, supported feeding schemes, shared information, assisted vulnerable households, supported youth programmes and expanded our gardens.

The state had statistics.

Communities had relationships.

We knew who had lost income. We knew who was hungry. We knew who needed support. We knew because we live among one another.

During this period, I personally experienced the impact of rising food prices while purchasing weekly provisions for 37 feeding schemes. For many households, rising prices were not just economic indicators. They determined whether a family could eat, whether a feeding scheme could continue and how far limited resources could stretch.

The Competition Commission's investigations into food markets have raised important questions about concentration, pricing and fairness within our food system. Hunger is not only about the availability of food. It is also about access, affordability and the power relationships that shape our food economy.

But food security cannot be achieved through food parcels alone.

We must move towards food sovereignty.

In Bonteheuwel, our community gardens and food forests showed that working-class communities are not only consumers. We are producers, innovators and custodians of knowledge.

We planted because we needed to survive.

We planted because food prices were becoming unbearable.

We planted because growing food is also an act of reclaiming dignity.

However, we must acknowledge the realities we face. The Cape Flats does not naturally provide easy agricultural conditions. Our soils require investment, composting, soil rehabilitation, water access and technical support. Community gardens cannot survive on commitment alone.

During our journey, we experienced the challenge of having no boreholes, no JoJo tanks and no adequate rainwater harvesting systems. Our children volunteering in the gardens carried two-litre bottles of water from home and brought organic waste for composting.

Their commitment was inspiring.

But it also raises a difficult question:

Why should children carry water to sustain community food systems when society has the resources and knowledge to invest in proper infrastructure?

This brings us to the question we must ask:

Who controls our water?

Water is not separate from food. Water is life.

Land without water cannot sustain life. As we continue the struggle for land justice, we must also secure democratic stewardship of our water resources.

Food sovereignty requires water sovereignty.

It requires communities having a meaningful voice in decisions about the resources that sustain life.

But building resilient food systems cannot become the responsibility of communities alone.

We need a new social compact between the state, communities, producers, retailers, universities and civil society.

Government has constitutional responsibilities to promote social and economic development, ensure access to basic rights and create conditions where people can live with dignity.

Universities and researchers must work with communities as partners in producing knowledge, recognising that lived experience is also expertise.

Agricultural departments must support urban agriculture through training, extension services, soil improvement, innovation and appropriate technologies such as hydroponics and aeroponics.

Producers and retailers must recognise their responsibility in creating a fairer food system where nutritious food is accessible and affordable.

Civil society organisations must be recognised for the vital role they play in strengthening democracy and community resilience.

This is why we must move beyond traditional Public-Private Partnerships towards Public-Private-Community Partnerships.

Communities are not passive beneficiaries.

We are partners.

We are knowledge holders.

We are builders of solutions.

This is where the idea of a Commons Economy becomes important.

A Commons Economy asks a different question.

Instead of asking only how much profit can be extracted, it asks:

How do we organise our shared resources to sustain life?

A Commons Economy recognises:

• Food as a right, not a commodity.
• Water as a shared resource requiring democratic stewardship.
• Care as essential infrastructure.
• Community gardens as economic and social assets.
• Waste pickers as environmental workers.
• Artisans as builders of local resilience.
• Community kitchens and bakeries as local economic hubs.
• Women's labour as productive work deserving recognition and fair remuneration.

This connects directly to Local Economic Development.

Our communities already have skills and capabilities.

We have artisans.

We have bakers.

We have gardeners.

We have waste pickers.

We have environmental workers.

We have young people with energy and creativity.

The question is whether our economic systems are designed to recognise and invest in these strengths.

Instead of creating endless cycles of temporary work and dependence, we need dignified employment, local procurement, insourcing where appropriate and community enterprises that allow wealth to circulate within neighbourhoods.

The future of our communities cannot be built through government alone.

It cannot be built through markets alone
It must be built through collective responsibility.

The Commons of Care is not an idea waiting to be created.

It already exists in our communities.

It exists in the hands of women who feed families.

It exists in the gardens we nurture.

It exists in the neighbours who share water.

It exists in the volunteers who step forward in times of crisis.

It exists in the young people who believe another future is possible.

Our challenge is to recognise it, resource it and place it at the centre of our development.

Because the true measure of an economy is not how much wealth it accumulates.

The true measure of an economy is whether it sustains life.

Care is not charity.

Care is work.

Care is power.

Care is the foundation of a just, democratic and humane society.

Bonteheuwel Development Forum
Building resilient communities through solidarity, dignity and collective action.

23/07/2026

From rainfall and river basins to oceans and underground aquifers, we’ll examine how water flows through every part of the food system, and the consequences for people and planet.

25/02/2026

Please watch our introduction to our book and click on our Back a Buddy link to help us reach our goal, which is to print about 300 books and run 6 to 10 workshops for women's collectives in working-class communities.

https://www.backabuddy.co.za/campaign/henriette-abrahams

Please help us get our book From The Ashes We Rise authored by 12 BDF women published.  The funds we are raising is to r...
25/02/2026

Please help us get our book From The Ashes We Rise authored by 12 BDF women published. The funds we are raising is to run workshops on our six themes for our working class women in various communities in order to build our Women's Assembly Movement Accross our province and country.

Your pre-order and or sponsorship will assist us greatly in reaching our goal by May this year.

Please share with others that may be able to chip in.

FROM THE ASHES WE RISE A feminist book, a collective process, an offering to women and movements From the Ashes We Rise is a 350+ page feminist p...

Hearty congratulations to Duncan Keith, Clive Carollissen, and the entire Bridge and Mentorship Team for nearly two year...
20/02/2026

Hearty congratulations to Duncan Keith, Clive Carollissen, and the entire Bridge and Mentorship Team for nearly two years of steady, committed leadership in guiding our young learners from Arcadia, Boundary, Rosewood, and Bell Park Primary Schools, as well as Modderdam High School.

Your work in bridge classes and mentorship, culminating in yesterday’s tournament, stands as a powerful example of what sustained investment in young people can achieve. Thank you as well for inviting the Bonteheuwel Development Forum to be part of the tournament and medal award ceremony.
It was truly an honour to witness this milestone.

I am in complete awe of our youngsters. The critical thinking, analytical reasoning, discipline, and confidence they are developing through this programme are skills they carry into their school subjects and into their everyday lives. These are life skills that strengthen decision-making, self-belief, and resilience.

Special congratulations to the winning teams:
1st place: Arcadia Primary School
2nd place: Boundary Primary School
3rd place: Modderdam High School
4th place: Rosewood Primary School
5th place: Bell Park Primary School

Every learner who participated is a winner. Showing up, thinking deeply, working as a team, and competing with integrity already disrupts the narrow and harmful narratives so often imposed on Cape Flats youth.

I am deeply thankful to the team for creating alternative pathways for our children and for actively changing the stereotypical story told about where our children come from and what they are capable of becoming.

We also appreciate the invitation for BDF to come on board to support the programme through our psychosocial support work. This kind of partnership strengthens children not only academically, but emotionally and socially.

This initiative speaks directly to Taking Back Our Streets, changing the narrative, and disrupting gang recruitment and reducing vulnerability to substance abuse. When young people are engaged, challenged, and supported, the streets lose their power.

Thank you for believing in our children and walking this journey with our communities. This is how we build safer streets, stronger minds, and freer futures.

RISE UP FOR ROJAVAMYTH 1: Rojava is “just a Kurdish issue”Truth: Rojava is multi-ethnic and multi-faith. Kurds, Arabs, A...
28/01/2026

RISE UP FOR ROJAVA

MYTH 1: Rojava is “just a Kurdish issue”

Truth: Rojava is multi-ethnic and multi-faith. Kurds, Arabs, Assyrians, Yazidis, Christians, Muslims, and others build democracy together. Like Palestinians, Kurds were denied self-determination by colonial powers. Rojava rejects divide-and-rule, just like our anti-apartheid struggle.

MYTH 2: Supporting Rojava distracts from Palestine
Truth: One struggle, many fronts. Palestine, Rojava, Sudan, Congo, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Venezuela, all resist the same imperial system. Supporting Rojava strengthens Palestine. Silence weakens all struggles.

MYTH 3: Rojava is backed by the US and not progressive
Truth: Tactical alliances under siege do not erase political autonomy. US withdrawal now enables attacks on Rojava. Imperial powers use people when convenient and discard them when no longer useful. South Africans know this story.

MYTH 4: Opposing ISIS and religious authoritarianism is Islamophobic
Truth: Rojava opposes fundamentalism, not faith. Muslim leaders and communities are central. Patriarchy weaponised through religion must be named and resisted. Faith ≠ fascism.

MYTH 5: This war is about security
Truth: It’s about territory, trade, water, oil, and political imagination. Rojava shows that another society is possible, women co-lead, communities govern themselves, difference is respected. That is intolerable to militarised nationalism and imperial powers.

MYTH 6: Rojava is only about women
Truth: Rojava is feminist by design. Women co-lead, run justice systems, and defend communities. Patriarchy is a political problem. Kill women’s liberation, and you kill the revolution.

MYTH 7: International solidarity won’t change anything
Truth: South Africa exists thanks to internal resistance and international solidarity. Rojava calls for sanctions, investigations, and protection of civilian self-administration. Solidarity is strategy, not charity.

WHY RISE UP NOW
Rojava faces siege, displacement, and bombings during ceasefires. If it falls: women’s liberation is negotiable, democracy is disposable, imperial borders are permanent. We refuse that future.

OUR CALL TO ACTION

Build local solidarity committees
Organise teach-ins and political education
Counter propaganda and misinformation
Mobilise women and working-class movements
Link local struggles (land, water, safety, dignity) to global resistance

Jin. Jiyan. Azadi.
Women. Life. Freedom.

What we heard from Councillor Francine Higham the Mayoral Committee Member for Community Services and Health this mornin...
26/01/2026

What we heard from Councillor Francine Higham the Mayoral Committee Member for Community Services and Health this morning on Lester Kiewiet's show on Cape Talk was a business justification for a public service decision, and that is precisely the problem.

The City keeps talking about costs, staffing models, maintenance cycles, and pilots. What is missing entirely is any discussion about spatial injustice, public goods, or the obligation of the state to redress historical inequality.

Of course public facilities cost money. That is not new information. That is why people pay rates and taxes.

The real question is not whether swimming pools cost money. The question is why the cost of providing public services is suddenly treated as a burden when it comes to working class communities, but not when it comes to tourist areas or prestige spaces.

We never hear this language when it comes to maintaining beachfront infrastructure, city bowl amenities, or tourist facing facilities. Those are treated as investments. Township facilities are treated as expenses.

What was striking in that interview was what was not said. There was nothing about spatial inequality. Nothing about the fact that many communities do not have private alternatives. Nothing about public health during extreme heat. Nothing about youth safety or violence prevention.

When justice language is absent from policy explanations, it tells us exactly whose lives are being centred and whose are being managed.

A pilot is supposed to test something new. Community swimming pools have existed for decades. There is nothing experimental about keeping them open in summer.

What is being piloted here is not service delivery. What is being piloted is how much deprivation working class communities will tolerate before pushing back.

Public infrastructure is not a commercial product. It is a constitutional responsibility. Decisions about access to public goods cannot be reduced to balance sheets alone. They require consultation, equity analysis, and a developmental lens.

Where is the Sport and Recreation Plan that guided this decision? Where is the equity assessment? And who exactly was consulted before weekday access was removed?

If governance is reduced to cost containment without justice, then inequality becomes policy, even if no one says it out loud.

You cannot manage inequality with spreadsheets and then be surprised when communities resist.

When government starts speaking the language of business instead of the language of justice, the poor always pay the price.

Budgets are moral documents. They show what a city values. If we can afford to keep tourist infrastructure operating consistently, then we can afford to keep community pools open during summer.

What is missing is not money. It is political will.

The City’s response is clear.....they will use our rates, tax, levies and VAT money and spend it elsewhere where it is more beneficial and profitable for business and return on investment ......NOT on poor communities.

Bonteheuwel Development Forum responseThe City’s statement confirms that weekday access to community swimming pools was ...
25/01/2026

Bonteheuwel Development Forum response

The City’s statement confirms that weekday access to community swimming pools was removed and is now being partially restored through a temporary pilot
Opening pools only from Wednesday to Sunday still leaves communities without access on Mondays and Tuesdays during peak summer. This is not full weekday access and does not meet the needs of working class communities facing extreme heat, overcrowding, and limited recreational options.

Presenting this as a pilot to test whether weekday operations can be sustained raises serious concerns. Community pools are essential public infrastructure, not experimental projects. Sustainability planning should have been done before facilities were closed, not after communities were forced to mobilise in response.

The City also confirms that this change only comes into effect from 28 January 2026, meaning communities went without weekday access for the half of January, one of the hottest months of the year. This undermines claims of proactive or people centred planning.
While the City highlights investment in pool upgrades, infrastructure improvements do not translate into access if operating hours exclude working class residents for most of the week. Investment without equitable access does not address inequality.

There is also no reference in the City’s statement to learner truancy or education discipline, confirming that claims made by Subcouncil 15 Chairperson Angus McKenzie linking weekday closures to learners bunking school are not grounded in official policy or evidence.

BDF maintains that the appropriate response is full weekday access to community swimming pools throughout summer, applied consistently across the city, and guided by an equity based and developmental approach.

Pilots and partial measures do not resolve structural inequality.

Communities require certainty, access, and respect.

Bonteheuwel Development Forum

Stop the City of Cape Town Apartheid style decision making modi's operandi.
23/01/2026

Stop the City of Cape Town Apartheid style decision making modi's operandi.

Address

8 Jasmine Street
Bonteheuwel
7764

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Bonteheuwel Development Forum - BHDF posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share