13/10/2026
đą Newly published alert! https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/mcn.70239
This paper looks at misinformation and science-denialist rhetoric in breastfeeding and infant feeding. Youâve surely heard these:
â âThis âdata-drivenâ economist says breastfeeding doesnât make a difference.â
â âI read that Baby Friendly hospitals starve babies.â
â âFormula feeding helps fathers bond.â
â And yes, âfed is best.â
âBreastfeeding Science Denialism: Unpacking a Hidden Harm,â open access in Maternal & Child Nutrition, describes how misinformation in infant feeding discourse follows the same playbook seen in other areas long targeted by science denialism, such as vaccines, climate change, and the harms of to***co. It is the first time a science denialism framework has been applied to breastfeeding misinformation.
Breastfeeding denialism tends to come in five strategic categories:
1. Minimization. âBreastfeeding benefits are oversold,â âFed is best,â âAll that matters is a healthy baby,â etc. Here you also tend to see formula compared to MILK rather than to breastfeeding, which lowers the evidence bar that formula has to clear.
2. Misappropriation of research. Cherry-picking studies (e.g., PROBIT, the sibling study) to create an impression of scientific controversy where there is none.
3. Misrepresenting clinical standards. Lactation professionals are recast as âactivistsâ rather than experts. Claims that clinicians routinely starve babies in the name of breastfeeding (which would directly contradict clinical guidelines).
4. Appeals to individualism. Breastfeeding is reframed as a âlifestyle choiceâ rather than a public health and access issue. As long as mothers are pointing fingers at each other, they arenât pointing them at the people in power.
5. Leveraging authority. Physicians writing op-eds that misrepresent the science, IBCLCs participating in formula-sponsored events, and an industry-created âInfant Feeding Technicianâ credential that confers no clinical expertise.
The aim of this paper is to equip clinicians, educators, and advocates with the tools to communicate this science effectively, with compassion and nuance through a systems approach:
đ©ș Comprehensive lactation curricula in medical training.
đ„ Professional organizations naming denialism directly and supporting clinicians in pursuing lactation medicine.
đïž Policy that enables breastfeeding: paid leave, access to childcare, and breastfeeding in school curricula.
To make sure busy clinicians can read the paper, it is both short and free! đđŒ
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/mcn.70239
đ Share widely in your professional networks!