24/06/2026
Why is FORT BEMBRIDGE asymmetric ?
Victorian Forts are generally built very precisely without the errors of alignment often found in earlier buildings. Fort Bembridge was built between 1862 and 1867 to an elongated hexagon plan which, on first sight, looks to have at least two lines of symmetry. Closer scrutiny shows that it is not quite right with some of the alignments being about 2 degrees out of “square”.
Asymmetry is not unusual in forts and could be because of a number of reasons. It could be caused by tactical considerations such as fields of fire and local topography exterior to the fort. There could be geological considerations. The unexcepted alignment could be because the fort has been built on a site occupied by previous structures or if the design of the fort changed during or after construction.
There are other asymmetries in the fort. The batter angle is different on different faces of the scarp wall but that can presumably be explained by the intensity of incoming fire expected for different faces of the fort.
The Earl of Yarborough’s Monument was right in the middle of the site of the fort and this was relocated. There was also an important change in the design of the fort where a slightly cranked north west face and counterscarp galleries in the original plan were replaced by caponiers and counterscarp crochets. These changes don’t obviously explain the asymmetry. I don’t know of any geological peculiarities and a 2 degree realignment doesn’t seem to be consistent with that sort of problem anyway.
Any ideas?
Images: Ordnance Survey and Google Maps