09/01/2026
Something worth knowing if you're thinking about a conservation easement on your land:
Federal rules about which wetlands and streams are protected have changed six times since 2015. This is not a “red” or a “blue” issue. The current proposed rule, called the WOTUS (Waters of the United States) rule, would remove federal Clean Water Act protection from the majority of wetlands in the country. Depending on where you live, the wet areas on your farm may or may not have federal protection at any given time, depending on who's in office and what definition the EPA is currently using.
A conservation easement through V2 doesn't work that way.
When we place a conservation easement on a piece of land, it protects that land permanently. That protection doesn't change with a new administration. It doesn't expire. It doesn't depend on whether a federal agency considers your stream to be "jurisdictional" under the current definition of the week.
The restored creek stays restored. The wetland stays protected. The easement stays on the deed.
Adam McIntyre, V2's founder, puts it directly: "The principle is to correct and restore what we've degraded over the last 100 years. Federal protection can shift with every new administration. Conservation easements take that decision out of the political cycle entirely. And remember folks, this isn’t a political red vs blue issue, it’s a human issue. We all should want to support the protection and restoration of these critical systems for our present and future!"
If you're a landowner with a wet section of property (a stream bank, a drained wetland, a soggy field that never quite worked for crops) the question of federal jurisdiction matters less than the question of what you want to happen to that land. A conservation easement answers that question and pays you for it, regardless of what Washington does next.
[Sources: Environmental Protection Network · EPA/USACE Regulatory Impact Analysis, Proposed 2025 WOTUS Rule · K&L Gates legal analysis (December 2025)]