09/19/2026
The MRCA has won an important Court of Appeal decision upholding its right to enforce a conservation easement protecting a wildlife corridor in Laurel Canyon.
The case, Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority v. Bakalinskaya, originated in 2015, when the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy waived its right of first refusal to a City of LA-owned parcel that was being sold as “exempt surplus land” to an adjacent private property owner. In exchange for the waiver, the private party agreed to dedicate a conservation easement covering an 8ft strip along the border of the property & to donate a separate parcel to MRCA in fee title for the purpose of establishing a “habitat linkage,” a corridor that allows wildlife to move freely between larger areas.
After signing the settlement & executing the easement, the property owner proceeded to develop within the conservation easement. MRCA subsequently determined that improvements, including an elevated parking deck, artificial lighting & numerous retaining walls, blocked the conservation easement. MRCA staff attempted to have the owner address the violations, but those efforts were unsuccessful.
In Aug 2022, MRCA filed suit seeking to enforce the conservation easement. Represented by Richards, Watson & Gershon, MRCA prevailed at a jury trial in Nov. 2024. The jury found that the defendants had breached the easement, & the trial court subsequently ordered specific corrective work to bring the property into compliance with the easement. The defendants appealed.
The Court of Appeal heard oral arguments on Sept 10, 2026, & issued its decision on Sept 15, affirming the trial court’s judgment in favor of MRCA. The Court also affirmed the trial court’s determination that MRCA was the prevailing party and entitled to recover its costs on appeal.
“The bottom line is that the MRCA will enforce its conservation easements to the fullest extent of the law,” said Chief Staff Counsel Jeff Maloney.
The decision leaves in place the judgment requiring corrective work to bring the property into compliance with the conservation easement, which was established to protect the wildlife corridor.
Read full court opinion at mrca.ca.gov