04/27/2023
IT'S OFFICIAL !!! SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO
COUNTY OF FRESNO, a political subdivisio
of the State of California, CASE NO.: 13 V.
Plaintiff, COMPLAINTFORDECLARATORY
RELIEF; INJUNCTIVE RELIEF [CAL CODE
CTV.PROC. SECTION 1060; ASSEMBLY BILL
2022, CAL GOV'T CODE SECTIONS 14 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 8899.90, etsec.]: VIOLATION OF
15 Defendant. FIRSf AMENDMENT " The County asserts there is a dispute as to the legal rights and obligations
of the County versus the legal rights and prohibitions on the State and therefore is entitled to
declaratory judgment, declaring that AB-2022 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to the
County and Squaw Valley residents. The County also alleges that it is entitled to injunctive
relief, a preliminary and permanent injunction, enjoining the state from changing the name o
that Community or forcing the County to replace any signage, markers or maps relating to tha
Community. The County also alleges it is unlawful to permit the Committee to change othe
names it finds "offensive", and the County is entitled to declaratory relief that such Committe
authority is unlawful. "
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
Violation of Free Speech and Association Rights: First Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution
15. The County has an obligation to provide for and to protect the general
welfare of the inhabitants of the County, including those who reside, work, or have businesses i
its communities.
16. There is an alliance of interest between the County and the people who
reside, or have businesses in the Community to protect the long-established heritage of that
Community including all its markers, signage and maps that contain "Squaw Valley". https://www.fresnobee.com/fresnoland/article274709081.html