08/24/2026
📣 ADVOCACY OPPORTUNITY: Write a public comment against affirmative asylum referrals without interview.
A new DHS rule allows USCIS to refer certain affirmative asylum applications directly to immigration court without first interviewing the applicant, based on the written record and other available evidence. This may harm asylum seekers by removing a key opportunity to explain their experiences and clarify their claims before being placed into removal proceedings, potentially making an already complex process more difficult to navigate.
đź”—Submit a comment: https://buff.ly/SEYwPHG
➡️ Public Comment Example Template (we strongly encourage you to rewrite a comment in your own words):
I am writing to oppose the interim final rule “Affirmative Asylum Referrals Without Interview.”
Allowing USCIS to refer asylum applications to immigration court without an in-person interview takes away a critical chance for people to explain their stories, correct mistakes, and overcome language or trauma-related barriers. Many asylum seekers cannot fully share their experiences on paper alone, especially without legal help.
This rule will likely push more cases into already backlogged immigration courts and make it harder for people with strong claims to get protection. I urge DHS and USCIS to keep in-person interviews as the norm in affirmative asylum cases and to address backlogs through increased staffing and support, not by reducing due process.
Thank you for considering my comment.
[If you have any particular case stories or data that would shed light on how these increases would affect you, your friends/family, or organization, add that information here.]