WecU Human Justice Corporation

04/28/2026

That’s how it is done . We have to respect the ones that do the right thing

Then-District Attorney Kelly Burke put Jessie Askew away for life. But, after having second thoughts, Burke has been pushing for his release for over a decade.

04/22/2026

Attorneys affiliated with WecU Human Justice Corporation prioritize the organization's mission, team, and the welfare of the people they serve above all else. Every decision is guided by the commitment to uphold these core principles and adhere to the values that define them. As they continue their work, they encourage team members to collaborate with diligence and purpose, recognizing that not all stakeholders share the same objectives. Therefore, it is crucial to remain vigilant, focused, and protective of their collective efforts. This approach emphasizes integrity, accountability, and ensuring their work benefits the community rather than individual interests. They value the support of everyone who shares their purpose and commitment to truth.

02/10/2026

Temporary Protective Order

What I witnessed in court today was deeply troubling and disheartening. The denial of a Temporary Protective Order (TPO) in the face of documented concerns reflects a failure to fully appreciate the realities and dangers of domestic violence. From lived experience, I know that moments like these—when warning signs are minimized or dismissed—are often the moments that precede irreversible harm.

It is particularly concerning how claims of “children’s well-being” are frequently weaponized by abusive individuals as a means of maintaining access to, control over, or proximity to the mother. This tactic is well documented and widely recognized in domestic violence advocacy, yet it continues to succeed in courtrooms across this country.

During these proceedings, I observed family members of the respondent provide testimony denying any knowledge of abuse. Such statements, especially when made despite credible allegations and supporting documentation, contribute to a culture of silence and enable harm. When families choose denial over accountability, they do so at the expense of women and children—and often in contradiction to the values they would claim to hold for their own daughters.

To women watching or experiencing similar circumstances: if you are facing abuse, document it. Report it. Seek protection. And if necessary, prioritize your safety and your children’s safety above all else—even if that means relocating. Courts, families, and systems are not always aligned with your protection, and waiting for validation can be dangerous.

Today, substantial facts were presented to the court in advance, including detailed documentation and an amicus brief outlining the risks and concerns. Despite this, the request for a TPO was denied. This outcome warrants reflection and accountability. Judges hold immense responsibility; their decisions can either interrupt cycles of harm or unintentionally allow them to continue.

Domestic violence is not theoretical. It is not rare. And it is not something that resolves itself through good intentions alone. When warning signs are ignored, women and children pay the price.

This statement is written not out of anger, but out of urgency—and out of commitment to truth, safety, and justice. Clayton County, Georgia wish yall did better Jewel Scott for Judge failed A DV victim-

01/16/2026

FYI:

Nonprofits can and do receive money through donations, grants, program income, contracts, and fundraising and it’s not illegal for them to pay staff or executives. In fact, most nonprofits need paid employees just like any other organization to run programs, manage fundraising, and stay operational. 

Here’s the part that many people don’t understand:

Nonprofits do NOT exist to enrich insiders.
Under federal tax law, a nonprofit must be organized and operated for a charitable purpose

Salaries ARE allowed — but they must be reasonable.
The IRS says nonprofit boards are responsible for setting “reasonable and not excessive” compensation that reflects what similar organizations pay in the same region and field. It’s not a blank check. 

If compensation is too high, the IRS can impose significant penalties — including excise taxes on the person paid and even penalties gia law (and nonprofit governance rules) requires conflict-of-interest oversight, good recordkeeping, and fiduciary duty — which means boards must act in the nonprofit’s best interest, not personal gain. 

Here’s the reality check 👇

Large nonprofits with big budgets often pay full-time CEOs and staff, because they run multi-million-dollar programs that require professional management.

Small nonprofits, especially grassroots and community-led ones, often struggle to pay any salary — relying on volunteers and lean teams.

Some people unfairly judge small nonprofits for not having big salaries — but in reality, big salaries in big nonprofits often reflect the work, complexity, compliance demands, and legal expectations of running large services.

Nonprofits can pay staff legally.
They must justify that compensation.
They cannot use nonprofit funds for personal enrichment.
And they must operate transparently under federal IRS rules and Georgia nonprofit law.

If you want smaller nonprofits to thrive, the answer isn’t to shame legal compensation it’s to support equity, transparency, and capacity-building across the nonprofit sector.

01/15/2026

Unacceptable

A jury convicted an 83-year-old Ohio man of murder in the shooting of an Uber driver who he wrongly thought was trying to rob him after scam phone calls deceived them both

01/01/2026

Reflecting on this past year, I’m proud to share that we’ve successfully helped 17 individuals return home or get close to it—a significant achievement for all involved. While many stories remain untold for safety reasons, it’s important to acknowledge the impact we’re making together.

This year has had its share of challenges and triumphs. I’ve witnessed the true colors of those around me: some have shown unwavering loyalty, while others have revealed different motives. Ultimately, this journey is about growth, discovering our unique niches, and striving to make the most of our talents.

As advocates, we each focus on different issues, and I’m excited about the prospect of collaborating on initiatives that prioritize mental health within the Department of Corrections. Our mission remains clear: to expand our support network and create positive change across the nation.

For those who celebrate this evening, I wish you a safe and joyful time. I’ll be at home, enjoying a quiet night with my family.

Looking ahead, we’re committed to advocating for more individuals to return home and working diligently to drive legislative changes. It’s crucial that we unite across party lines to create laws that truly reflect the needs of our communities.

I also plan to emphasize transparency by reporting on conditions within prisons and holding staff accountable. Addressing these issues is vital, regardless of staffing shortages or other challenges.

Cheers to continued progress and getting more people home! Thank you to everyone who supports this vision. Together, we can make a difference.

12/20/2025

⭐️ UPDATE ON MARKUS CROWDER'S CASE (GDC #623937) ⭐️

Marcus Crowder was charged with two counts of murder. Key points from the case:
No direct evidence or eyewitnesses to the crime were presented by the state.
A witness testified about a separate case where Marcus wasn't arrested/charged; the GA Supreme Court said it was error to allow this testimony.
Witness accounts from the night of the alleged incident were contradictory.
A detective testified about a disputed confession.
Marcus was acquitted of count one but convicted of felony murder in count two, raising double jeopardy concerns.

The state is resisting reconsideration.

12/20/2025

⭐️ UPDATE ON MARCUS CROWDER'S CASE (GDC #623937) ⭐️

Marcus Crowder was charged with two counts of murder. Key points from the case:
No direct evidence or eyewitnesses to the crime were presented by the state.
A witness testified about a separate case where Marcus wasn't arrested/charged; the GA Supreme Court said it was error to allow this testimony.
Witness accounts from the night of the alleged incident were contradictory.
A detective testified about a disputed confession.
Marcus was acquitted of count one but convicted of felony murder in count two, raising double jeopardy concerns.

The state is resisting reconsideration.

This is a organization which fights for everyone and your rights. No one is left behind

09/13/2025

FYI

When witnesses alter their statements during court proceedings, it compromises the integrity of the justice system. This not only violates the principles of truth and fairness but also raises serious concerns regarding the reliability of testimony.

Under the US Constitution, defendants possess the right to confront their accusers and challenge inconsistent statements. However, when witnesses modify their testimony, it can jeopardize the pursuit of justice.

In Georgia, OCGA § 24-9-80 permits the use of prior inconsistent statements to impeach a witness's credibility. But what transpires when these inconsistencies are not adequately addressed?

From a judicial perspective, allowing testimony with prior inconsistent statements can be deemed an abuse of discretion, potentially culminating in reversible error. Judges play a critical role in ensuring the fairness and integrity of the trial process.

The District Attorney's office also bears the responsibility of upholding the law and seeking justice. If they knowingly present testimony with prior inconsistent statements, it could be perceived as a violation of their ethical obligations.