10/13/2026
Let me make something very clear.
The court order called for a headcount (inventory as the referred to it as) of the animals. A headcount means exactly that—counting the animals, not conducting an unauthorized veterinary evaluation.
I strongly objected to David Fuentes and Dr. Susan Heath representing the American Humane Society being the individuals sent to my property because of their previous involvement in my case. I have serious concerns about their ability to remain fair and impartial.
When they arrived, they attempted to enter the horse’s pen and go beyond what I understood the court order to authorize. I immediately objected, and my attorney also intervened.
A headcount is not a veterinary examination. I was not going to allow individuals I believe have demonstrated bias against me to conduct an evaluation of the animals, especially without my own veterinarian present.
Apparently, enforcing those boundaries did not sit well with David Fuentes. Following the visit, he reportedly raised concerns about the welfare of the animals and is now seeking to have my bond questioned.
Let that sink in. I complied with what I understood the court to have ordered, stood up for my rights, and insisted that the individuals involved stay within the scope of that order. Now I am facing the possibility of losing my freedom over yet another dispute involving the same individuals.
There is a difference between following a court order and allowing someone to exceed its authority.
I am not refusing accountability. I am demanding fairness, impartiality, and due process. I have every right to question the actions of individuals who have played such a significant role in the accusations against me.
I will continue fighting for my rights, these animals, and the truth. Being accused does not mean being guilty, and standing up for my rights should not be treated as a violation of my bond.
I want to make one more thing perfectly clear. I would have gladly welcomed law enforcement officers from outside Gonzales County onto my property to conduct the court-ordered inventory, without hesitation or objection. I have nothing to hide, and I never have.
My objections were never about avoiding accountability or preventing anyone from seeing the animals. They were about the involvement of specific individuals whose impartiality I have serious reasons to question.
I have always been transparent, I remain transparent, and I will continue to be transparent. But transparency does not mean surrendering my rights or remaining silent when I believe those rights are being violated.
All I have ever asked for is fairness, honesty, and an impartial process. I do not believe that is too much to ask.