07/28/2022
Posted • 1. Shame on Santa Cruz Sentinel editors for printing a canned guest commentary from a conservative-libertarian think tank. If printed at all, it should be a paid advertisement.
2. PRI’s assessment of CA’s over-representation of unhoused residents (compared to the nation) in spite of economic growth as a failure of social programs is wrong. Growing inequality from out-of-control capitalism and the hyper-financialization of housing, plus the decades-long neoliberal program of slashing the social-safety net, is what creates houselessness.
3. Housing First is a long-used, well-researched, very successful model for solving houselessness. Federal programs to house veterans with Housing First have been hugely successful locally. Housing First is not “housing and nothing else” and it does not “attract more people from outside the homeless system, or keep them in the homeless system, because they are drawn to the promise of a permanent and usually rent-free room.” Those are just lies.
4. Project Roomkey and Project Housekey are excellent programs that save lives, promote public health, and are economical compared to unsheltered houselessness. It is a travesty that Project Roomkey programs ended locally without each and every resident housed or kept in hotels until housing was found.
5. The root cause of houselessness is primarily economic, not mental health or substance use disorders. To continue to repeat this myth is to do a great disservice to people experiencing houselessness and the community at large. It perpetuates stereotypes, increases discrimination and hate speech/crimes, polarizes community conversations around solutions to houselessness, and stymies productive and collaborative program-building.
6. It is no surprise that the conclusion of the commentary calls for “innovations from the private sector.” PRI promotes cookie-cutter anti-houseless ordinances nationwide (are CSSO and OVO inspired by these?) and works with the Cicero Institute, founded by the co-founder of evil-tech company Palantir. One must wonder what the connection is to Newsom's carceral-care CARE Court proposal.