10/20/2012
For Immediate Release:
October 18, 2012
Contact:
State Senator Mike Green
Ryan Mitchell, Spokesman
989-928-5180
Green: Michigan can’t afford Proposal 3
Dear Editor
Soon voters will be deciding the fate of Proposal 3, which would require Michigan to generate 25 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025.
I am urging people to vote no on this proposal for a number of reasons:
1) The constitution is no place for energy policy. If you put something into the constitution it is enormously difficult to change. That’s why no other state has ever put such a policy into its foundational document. Technology changes rapidly, so do electrical needs and our economy. We’d be foolish to give away our ability to adapt.
2) Michigan has not yet even met the 10% standard passed by a previous legislature in 2008. It’s estimated that the additional wind turbines required by this proposal would cost Michigan energy consumers at least $12 billion in higher utility rates and other costs. Translate that into $12 billion worth of college tuition, jobs or savings…gone. Higher energy prices also mean higher costs for goods and services. We simply can’t afford it.
3) The Bay Area and the Thumb would likely be the location of many of the 3,100 new wind turbines that would have to be constructed to meet the 25% mandate, requiring almost half a million acres of land. Such a demand on property could spur efforts to place turbines in our Great Lakes, something most Michigan residents oppose.
4) A Citizens Research Council report has said that the proposal’s mandates may make it necessary “for the state to supersede local authority for zoning as it relates to locating windmills.” That means that you and I could have little to no say in what happens in our own communities or perhaps even on our own property. As it stands now, these decisions are left to local government and their residents, as it should be.
Simply put, Proposal 3 will have disastrous consequences for Michigan’s economy, consumers, job creators and local communities. As laudable as the goal of renewable energy is, it must be approached in a thoughtful and affordable manner. Michigan can’t afford the poorly thought out approach in this proposal.
I respectfully urge voters to say no on Proposal 3.
Sincerely,
Mike Green
State Senator
# # #