National Manufactured Home Owners Association

10/21/2026

Manufactured Housing Ownership & Finance Report
By Bob Anderson, Communications Chair
Coverage: October 12–18, 2026
Bottom line
The week’s largest development was EQT’s agreement to acquire Stockbridge, an institutional real-estate manager with a long manufactured-housing track record. This is consolidation of the investment-management and fund-control layer—not a newly announced sale of every community Stockbridge manages—but EQT expressly plans to expand manufactured housing as an “alternative living” strategy.
Separately, FG Communities disclosed two cash-funded acquisitions totaling 78 sites, illustrating how equity-rich consolidators can continue buying smaller parks despite unfavorable mortgage economics.
Major developments
1. EQT buys Stockbridge’s management and fund-control platform
Confirmed facts: On October 15, EQT agreed to acquire 100% of Stockbridge’s management company and general-partner entities for $375 million, with up to $175 million of performance-based payments through 2030. Stockbridge manages approximately $16.5 billion of fee-generating assets and $27 billion in gross asset value. Closing is expected in the first quarter of 2027, subject to approvals and investor consents.
Manufactured housing is central to the transaction’s stated strategy: EQT says Stockbridge brings specialized manufactured-housing expertise that it intends to use as the foundation for a broader “Alternative Living” franchise. Stockbridge’s own history records its 2008 seed investment in the YES! Communities platform.
Why it matters: This gives a much larger global alternative-asset manager control of Stockbridge’s management company and fund general partners, together with access to EQT’s fundraising, sourcing, operating-data and international distribution systems.
Likely resident effect: No immediate lot-rent or lease change follows merely from the manager acquisition, and the announcement does not establish that underlying parks are changing title. Longer term, however, the explicitly stated plan to scale manufactured housing could produce more capital for portfolio acquisitions and aggregation. Return targets may also reinforce emphasis on rent growth, occupancy, infill, fees and operating margins. That is analysis—not evidence of a planned increase at any specific community.
What to watch: Investor consents, closing, any change in governance of Stockbridge-managed manufactured-housing investments, new acquisition funds, and disclosure of how the transaction intersects with Stockbridge’s historic YES! relationship following Brookfield’s recent investment in YES!.
2. FG Communities adds two small parks using cash
Confirmed facts: FG Communities disclosed acquisitions in Garner and Mars Hill, North Carolina, on October 12 and 15. The purchases had closed October 8–9 and comprise 49 and 29 homesites, respectively. Both were funded with cash on hand; prices were not disclosed. FG says its associated entities now encompass 103 communities and more than 4,000 sites.
Why it matters: These are small transactions, but together they demonstrate continued aggregation below the large-portfolio level. Paying cash allows a public consolidator to transact without making the acquisitions immediately dependent on mortgage rates that currently exceed typical initial park yields.
Likely resident effect: Cash funding reduces near-term refinancing pressure, but it does not reveal the buyer’s rent strategy. FG promises community improvements, yet disclosed no affordability covenant, rent limitation, resident-purchase opportunity or Tenant Site Lease Protection commitment.
What to watch: Post-acquisition rent and fee notices, infrastructure spending, infill plans, subsequent mortgage placement, and whether future agency financing brings Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac lease protections.
Routine noise/items to watch
• Debt eased slightly, but negative leverage persists: Advertised best-case five-year park financing fell from approximately 6.66% to 6.60%, and ten-year pricing from 6.64% to 6.55%. Agency quotations are approximately 6.60%, bank financing 6.50%, and bridge debt 9%. These are marketing indications—not completed-loan averages. Against the lender’s approximately 5.9% national cap-rate estimate, typical agency debt remains roughly 70 basis points more expensive than the initial property yield.
• Resident implication of financing conditions: The modest weekly decline does not fundamentally improve acquisition leverage. It still favors cash-rich institutions over smaller buyers and resident groups, while encouraging financed owners to increase net operating income through rents, utility recovery, infill or expense reductions.
• GSE/FHFA policy: No FHFA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac action during the week materially changed Tenant Site Lease Protections, enforcement or Duty to Serve treatment. Fannie Mae’s current protections remain in place.
• Cap rates: No new authoritative transaction-based national cap-rate series appeared. The approximately 5.9% figure remains an indicative lender-market estimate, not a weekly market index.
• Florida: No consequential Florida park acquisition, resident purchase, Chapter 723 change, GSE-financing announcement, or ownership-related court ruling was confirmed for October 12–18. Florida’s existing resident-purchase provisions therefore remain unchanged; they provide stronger rights when an owner publicly offers a park than when the owner merely considers a third-party offer.

10/21/2026

Federal Housing Follow-Through Report
By Bob Anderson, Communications Chair
Week ending October 19, 2026
Material development
FHA opens multifamily insurance to manufactured-home “build-to-rent” projects
On October 14, HUD made build-to-rent communities eligible for FHA multifamily mortgage insurance. Eligible developments may include manufactured homes, alongside detached site-built homes, duplexes and triplexes.
• Completed: Policy took effect immediately for FHA’s Section 221(d)(4) construction program and Section 223(f) acquisition/refinancing program.
• Still required: Lenders must implement the new underwriting guidance; HUD must process projects and monitor results.
• Responsible body: HUD’s Federal Housing Administration and participating multifamily lenders.
• Funding status: This expands federal mortgage insurance rather than providing a new appropriation or rental subsidy.
• Resident impact: It could finance additional manufactured-home rentals or refinancing of newer communities. However, it does not create homeownership opportunities, affordability requirements, or new protections against rent and fee increases.
• Next watch: Initial project approvals, affordability terms, and whether insured developments include resident safeguards or primarily expand institutionally owned rentals.
This is an administrative implementation action, not newly enacted legislation.
Enacted ROAD Act implementation
Public Law 119-101 — 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act
No new manufactured-housing rule was identified this week following HUD’s October 7 implementation plan.
Outstanding actions remain:
• Chassis-free homes: HUD must establish construction, safety, installation, and labeling standards; states generally must certify conforming laws by July 11, 2027.
• Energy standards: HUD must adopt consensus-based manufactured-housing standards by July 11, 2027.
• PRICE grants: Permanent authorization is complete, but no new post-enactment appropriation or funding notice was identified.
• Small-dollar financing: No new HUD, CFPB, or banking-agency implementation guidance was located.
• BUILD NOW incentives: HUD’s approximately September 9 notification-and-guidance deadline remains publicly unconfirmed and therefore appears overdue.
• Off-site construction report: Due to Congress by July 11, 2027.
Official authority: Public Law 119-101.
Near-term ROAD Act action to watch
HUD’s October 27 vacant-loan sale will require bidders to attest to compliance with ROAD Act Title X, which restricts certain federal sales of residential assets to very large institutional investors.
• Completed: Compliance certification incorporated into the sale process.
• Still required: Sale ex*****on, enforcement of bidder attestations and reporting on property dispositions.
• Resident impact: Mostly indirect; implementation could influence who acquires vacant one-to-four-unit properties, potentially including manufactured homes classified as real property.
Stalled or unchanged
• DOE manufactured-housing energy rule: DOE still states that its 2022 standards have no legal effect pending testing and enforcement procedures. A conforming rule reconciling DOE’s statute with the ROAD Act has not appeared.
• FY2027 appropriations: Full-year HUD funding remains pending. H.R. 9170 is still a bill—not enacted law—so proposed manufactured-housing funding levels do not yet have legal effect.
• PRICE: No new appropriation, NOFO, or awards.
• Resident protections: No new federal rule governing manufactured-home community rents, fees, evictions, or community sales was identified.
Bottom line: The week’s main change is FHA’s immediate expansion of multifamily insurance to build-to-rent developments containing manufactured homes. It may increase rental supply, but it supplies financing without corresponding affordability or resident-protection requirements. ROAD Act rulemaking, PRICE funding, and DOE coordination remain unfinished.

09/28/2026

Manufactured Housing Ownership & Finance Report
By Bob Anderson, Communications Chair
Coverage: September 21–27, 2026
Bottom line
Two financing developments deserve attention:
• Litigation places almost $300 million in federal CDFI (Community Development Financial Institution) grants at risk days before expiration. Although not manufactured-housing-specific, disruption to CDFIs could reduce the subordinate and flexible capital that makes resident park purchases feasible.
• New reporting clarified that Enterprise Community Partners will relinquish control of BWE, an important Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac manufactured-community lender, to credit and multifamily investors. The unanswered question is whether underwriting protections exceeding GSE minimums will survive.
Major developments
1. Federal CDFI funding dispute threatens resident-purchase capacity
Confirmed facts: On September 21, the Freedom Economy Business Association sued Treasury and OMB over nearly $300 million in fiscal-2025 Community Development Financial Institution grants. Treasury had announced awards on September 15 but, according to the complaint, had not identified recipients or obligated the money. The grants risk expiring September 30. The suit also seeks action on another $289 million appropriated for fiscal 2026. No published ruling resolving the dispute was identified through September 27.
The lawsuit is not specific to manufactured housing, and available reporting does not establish that ROC USA Capital is an unpaid awardee. However, ROC USA Capital is a Treasury-certified CDFI specializing in resident-owned manufactured-home communities. It reports more than $557 million in acquisition, permanent, and improvement financing and identifies the Treasury CDFI Fund as a capital partner.
Why it matters: Resident groups typically cannot compete with institutional purchasers using conventional first mortgages alone. CDFIs supply acquisition loans, subordinate debt, predevelopment money, and flexible underwriting that bridge this capital gap.
Likely resident effect—analysis: A temporary delay may merely shift closing schedules. A sustained funding reduction would be more consequential: fewer purchase attempts, higher-cost capital and greater difficulty matching investor bids. That would weaken resident-purchase laws in practice even where residents retain a legal right to bid.
What to watch: The court’s ruling, whether Treasury obligates the fiscal-2025 funds before September 30, named awardees, and any changes in ROC or other nonprofit acquisition-lending capacity.
2. Control of agency lender BWE shifts away from a housing nonprofit
Confirmed facts: The sale itself was announced July 22, but a September 25 investigation supplied consequential new ownership and manufactured-housing details.
Bayview Asset Management’s mortgage-focused fund will become BWE’s majority owner; Springmont Capital—the Morgan family’s investment office—will also invest, while BWE management retains a significant minority. Closing is expected this fall, subject to approvals. BWE originates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans and maintains a dedicated manufactured-housing practice.
Enterprise’s audited accounts show that it held only 43.25% of BWE’s economic interest at year-end 2025 but controlled 57.72% of voting shares. They also confirm BWE’s status as a Freddie Mac manufactured-community seller/servicer and a Fannie Mae DUS lender able to deliver most loans without prior Fannie review.
Shelterforce reported that Enterprise previously used its ownership position to strengthen BWE’s manufactured-community underwriting beyond Fannie and Freddie’s minimum protections. Neither the contents of those standards nor a commitment to retain them after the sale has been disclosed. Its investigation also identified 108 BWE-arranged Fannie Mae loans from 2016–2022 to LLCs sharing Havenpark Communities’ headquarters address. Havenpark disputes allegations concerning its resident practices and says it invested or committed almost $250 million to community improvements during 2020–2026.
Why it matters: This is a change in control over a financing gateway, not a park acquisition. Agency lenders influence which consolidators obtain inexpensive, nonrecourse capital and what protections accompany that financing.
Likely resident effect—analysis: Existing Fannie/Freddie lease protections do not disappear. The risk is that undisclosed, Enterprise-influenced underwriting screens on rents, fees, maintenance, or sponsor conduct may narrow to the GSE minimum. Conversely, BWE says the new ownership will expand its financing capacity and deal flow—potentially accelerating portfolio aggregation.
What to watch: Closing approvals; publication or retention of enhanced MHC underwriting standards; lending to high-growth consolidators; and whether Enterprise directs any sale proceeds toward resident acquisitions. Enterprise says the proceeds will seed an endowment but has not disclosed the transaction value or manufactured-housing allocation.
Routine noise/items to watch
• Debt did not meaningfully ease: The ten-year Treasury increased from 5.01% on September 18 to 5.18% on September 24. Yet advertised best-case park-loan quotations were mixed: five-year financing edged from 6.52% to 6.53%, while ten-year pricing declined from 6.59% to 6.55%; bridge debt remained near 9%. These are quotations, not closed-loan averages.
• Negative leverage persists: A broker’s approximately 5.9% national cap-rate estimate remains roughly 63 basis points below its 6.53% agency-debt indication. The cap-rate figure is an indicative market estimate—not a transaction index—but the gap continues to favor equity-rich buyers and income-growth strategies over highly leveraged acquisitions.
• No GSE policy change: FHFA announced no manufactured-community Tenant Site Lease Protection, enforcement or Duty to Serve change during the week. The agency’s Duty to Serve page still reflects the existing 2025–2027 plans.
• California decisions remain pending: AB 635, which would extend and strengthen the state’s Mobile Home Residency Law enforcement program, remained before the governor through September 27. It has not yet changed resident rights.
• International consolidation signal: Warburg Pincus raised its bid for Australian land-lease operator Ingenia to A$2.06 billion, 6.3% above its first proposal. Ingenia rejected it again, so no transaction occurred. The persistence of the bid nevertheless shows continuing private-equity demand for scalable land-lease platforms.
Highest near-term resident issue: Preservation of CDFI acquisition capital.

Most important consolidation signal: BWE’s pending control change and its future underwriting standards.

09/28/2026

Federal Housing Follow-Through
By Bob Anderson, Communications Chair
Week ending September 28, 2026
Material update: federal housing funding continues through December 11
A correction to prior reports: Congress enacted the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (Public Law 119-103) on September 2. It funds HUD, USDA, and other covered agencies at FY2026 rates through December 11, 2026, unless Congress enacts full-year appropriations earlier. It also generally prohibits starting activities that lacked FY2026 funding.
Consequences for manufactured housing:
• HUD’s manufactured-housing regulatory program can continue at the FY2026 level—up to $14 million from the Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund—rather than facing a September 30 shutdown.
• FY2026 Moving to Work authority allowing participating housing agencies to use prior Section 8 and Section 9 reserves flexibly is carried forward under the continuing resolution through December 11. This supports HUD’s new option for project-based vouchers in manufactured housing.
• The stopgap does not settle full-year FY2027 funding. Agencies are directed to take limited funding actions, and grant awards may not prejudice Congress’s final decisions.
PRICE grants: funding remains unclear in practice
The ROAD to Housing Act permanently authorized PRICE, but HUD has not published a new PRICE funding notice.
Although the continuing resolution is a post-enactment appropriation, it funds only activities supported in FY2026 and restricts new initiatives. The publicly available statutory materials do not establish a distinct FY2027 PRICE allocation. Therefore:
• Completed: Permanent statutory authorization.
• Unfinished: HUD funding determination, implementing guidance, and a new funding opportunity.
• Responsible bodies: HUD and the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.
• Resident impact: Infrastructure improvements, home replacement, eviction prevention, and resident-owned-community assistance remain unavailable through a new award round.
• Next watch: HUD’s grants page and the final FY2027 THUD legislation.
ROAD Act implementation: no meaningful new action this week
No new HUD rule, guidance, or implementation notice was located between September 21 and September 28 concerning:
• Chassis-free manufactured-home construction, labeling or installation standards.
• State certification procedures, due generally by July 11, 2027.
• HUD manufactured-housing energy standards, also due July 11, 2027.
• Small-dollar mortgage reforms involving HUD, CFPB, or banking regulators.
• The required off-site construction study.
• New PRICE grants.
HUD’s public news during the week focused principally on the Innovative Housing Showcase and Fair Housing Act enforcement, not ROAD Act implementation.
Stalled or overdue
• BUILD NOW notifications — overdue/publicly unconfirmed: HUD’s approximately September 9 deadline to notify eligible CDBG recipients of their housing-growth rates and issue regulatory-barrier guidance has passed. No public completion document was located.
• Replacement energy standards — pending: Following DOE’s September 18 declaration that its 2022 standards are legally ineffective, HUD must complete the consensus-based replacement process by July 11, 2027.
• DOE conforming rule — pending: DOE has announced plans to revise 10 CFR Part 460 but has not yet completed that rulemaking.
• PRICE implementation — stalled: Authorized, but no confirmed new allocation or funding notice.
• Full-year FY2027 THUD bill — pending legislation: Proposals such as H.R. 9170 remain bills, not enacted law. The immediate funding deadline is now December 11 rather than September 30.
Bottom line: No major implementation action occurred this week. The important correction is that a shutdown and expiration of current HUD authorities were already averted through December 11. The central unresolved issues remain full-year PRICE funding, HUD’s overdue BUILD NOW action, and the agency’s July 2027 manufactured-housing rulemaking deadlines.

09/26/2026

BEFORE YOU SIGN: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE BUYING A HOME OR MOVING INTO A MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY

Saturday, October 10, 2026
2:00 P.M. Eastern Time

Information, resources, and tips will be shared by the speakers:
- Kelly Fleck, Vice President of Homeownership, Next Step
- Dave Anderson, Executive Director, National Manufactured Home Owners Association

One important part of NMHOA's mission is to provide manufactured home owners and the associations that represent them with useful and timely information and resources related to manufactured...

09/21/2026

Federal Housing Follow-Through Report
By Bob Anderson, Chair, NMHOA Legislative & Communications Committees
Week ending September 21, 2026

Major Development: DOE Standards declared legally ineffective
On September 18, the Department of Energy formally announced that its 2022 manufactured housing energy efficiency standards have no legal effect following enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. DOE will not enforce the standards and plans to amend its regulations to reflect the statutory change.

Item Current Status
DOE’s 2022 standards Legally ineffective and unenforceable
DOE enforcement procedures No longer the controlling implementation step
Responsible agency going forward HUD
HUD Deadline July 11, 2027
Required process Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee and HUD regulatory process
Future updates At least once every three years

Resident Implications
The immediate effect is mixed:
• Manufacturers avoid compliance costs associated with the DOE standards, potentially reducing pressure on new-home purchase prices
• Buyers will not receive the federally projected energy savings from those standards
• In Florida, weaker efficiency requirements may mean greater cooling expenses over a home’s useful life.
• The final resident impact now depends on how HUD balances purchase affordability, insulation, HVAC efficiency, and long-term utility costs.

What remains unfinished
HUD must develop and adopt replacement minimum energy-efficiency standards by July 11, 2027. No qualifying HUD standards had been adopted as of September 18.

DOE must also complete a conforming rulemaking to remove or revise the now-ineffective provisions in 10 CFR Part 460. The ROAD Act itself remains the controlling authority.

Other unresolved matters

• BUILD NOW notifications: HUD’s statutory deadline to notify CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) recipients of their housing-growth improvement rates passed around September 9. Public completion still could not be confirmed. The requirement is now codified at 42 U.S.C. § 19507 ( Build Now Act).
• PRICE funding: No new post-enactment appropriation or funding notice was identified. The permanent manufactured-housing community preservation program therefore remains authorized but without confirmed new funding.
• Chassis-free homes: HUD has not yet published the required construction, labeling, and installation standards or state-certification procedures.
• Small-dollar mortgages: No new ROAD Act implementation guidance was identified from HUD, CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), or the federal banking agencies.
• FY2027 appropriations: Final HUD funding remains unresolved as the September 30 fiscal-year deadline approaches. This affects PRICE grants, manufactured-housing regulatory capacity, and temporary Moving to Work funding flexibility.

Bottom Line: Responsibility for manufactured-home energy standards has now shifted decisively from DOE to HUD. The next critical step is HUD’s consensus-based rulemaking, with replacement standards legally due by July 11, 2027.

09/21/2026

Manufactured Housing Ownership & Finance Brief
Coverage: September 14–20, 2026
By Bob Anderson, Chairman, NMHOA Legislative & Communications Committees

Bottom line
The week’s consequential development was renewed monetary tightening. The Federal Reserve raised its policy rate by 25 basis points, and indicative manufactured-community financing subsequently moved sharply higher. This further disadvantages leveraged and resident purchasers while strengthening incentives for existing owners to increase property income.
No major U.S. park-portfolio acquisition, FHFA tenant-protection change or material Florida development was confirmed.
Major developments
Federal Reserve hike deepens negative leverage for park acquisitions
Confirmed facts: On September 16, the Federal Reserve unanimously raised the federal funds target range by 25 basis points, to 3.75%–4.00%, citing elevated inflation.
The first published park-loan indications following the decision show:
• Five-year fixed financing: 6.52%, up from 6.27% one week earlier.
• Ten-year fixed financing: 6.59%, up from 6.39%.
• Bridge financing: unchanged near 9%.
These are advertised best-case quotations, not completed-loan averages.
The increase was not simply a parallel move in long-term Treasury rates: the ten-year Treasury ended September 17 at 4.94%, compared with 4.96% on September 11.
Why it matters: With broad national park cap-rate estimates still around 5.9%, quoted acquisition debt now costs roughly 60–70 basis points more than the property’s initial unlevered yield. That makes leveraged acquisitions harder to underwrite unless buyers expect substantial income growth, contribute more equity or obtain a lower price.
Likely resident effects — analysis:
• Greater pressure for lot-rent increases, utility recovery, fees, infill and expense reductions after acquisitions or refinancings.
• Lower loan proceeds and larger equity requirements for resident cooperatives and nonprofits trying to buy parks.
• A relative advantage for cash-rich private-equity and institutional buyers over smaller operators and resident groups.
• Possible transaction delays or price reductions if sellers refuse to accept higher cap rates.
Home financing also tightened: Freddie Mac’s conventional 30-year mortgage benchmark rose from 6.76% to 6.95%. That measure does not represent chattel loans, but it signals worsening conditions for manufactured homes financed as real property.
What to watch: Failed or repriced park sales, refinancing stress, lender debt-service requirements, cap-rate expansion, and whether maintenance budgets or resident charges absorb the higher capital cost.
Routine noise/items to watch
• FHFA and tenant-site protections: No FHFA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac action changed manufactured-community Tenant Site Lease Protections, enforcement or Duty to Serve treatment. FHFA’s September 18 notices concerned Federal Home Loan Bank information collections, not manufactured housing.
• California enforcement and financing bills: AB 635, which would extend and strengthen the state’s mobile home-law enforcement program, remained on the governor’s desk after its September 9 presentation. SB 996, addressing real-property treatment and mortgage access in certain resident-, nonprofit- and publicly owned settings, also remained unsigned.
• Cap rates and consolidation: No authoritative new cap-rate series or major U.S. portfolio sale was announced. Current lender material continues to cite an approximately 5.9% national cap rate, but limited transaction volume makes that estimate less reliable than a broad closed-sales index.
• Florida: No consequential Florida park acquisition, resident purchase, Chapter 723 change, GSE-financing announcement or ownership-related court ruling was confirmed for the week.

09/16/2026

NMHOA Federal Housing Follow-Up Report
Week ending September 14, 2026
By Bob Anderson, Communications Committee Chair

Material Development: ROAD Act deadline appears unmet publicly

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act required HUD, within 60 days of its July 11 enactment, to notify eligible Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) recipients of their housing-growth improvement rates and provide guidance on reducing regulatory barriers. That deadline fell approximately September 9, 2026. As of September 14, no notification, guidance document, or completion announcement could be located on HUD’s website or in the Federal Register.

• Status: Deadline passed, public completion cannot be confirmed.
• Responsible Agency: HUD
• Why it matters: These calculations will eventually affect CDBG allocations through bonuses and reductions based on local housing production performance.
• Resident impact: Communities that allow or encourage manufactured housing could benefit if HUD’s methodology properly counts manufactured homes and manufactured-home communities.
• Next action: Watch for HUD guidance, recipient notices, and publication of the calculation methodology.
• Primary authority: Sections of Public Law 119-101.

FY2027 funding remains unresolved

No final FY2027 HUD appropriations law was identified this week. Consequently:

• The ROAD Act’s permanent PRICE manufactured-housing grant program still lacks a confirmed post-enactment appropriation.
• HUD’s manufactured-housing regulatory work remains dependent on existing resources and whatever funding Congress ultimately provides.
• The House committee recommendation of $14 million for the Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund remains proposed funding, not enacted funding.
• Temporary Moving to Work authority permitting flexible use of certain accumulated reserves is still scheduled to expire September 30, 2026 unless Congress renews it.

The pending House THUD measure is HR 9170. A proposed continuing resolution also remains pending.

No meaningful implementation change

• ROAD Act manufactured-housing standards: No new HUD rulemaking was located concerning chassis-free manufactured homes, state certification procedures, or the required HUD energy-efficiency standards.
• PRICE grants: No new funding notice or Notice of Funding Opportunity was located. The law requires new grants to use money appropriated after July 11, 2026.
• Small-dollar manufactured home financing: No ROAD Act implementation guidance from HUD, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the federal banking agencies was located.
• DOE energy standards: Final testing and enforcement procedures remain outstanding. Compliance continues to depend on those procedures, while the ROAD Act separately requires HUD to adopt minimum manufactured housing standards by July 11, 2027.

Routine action, not a major policy change

On September 11, 2026, HUD requested renewed approval for information collection associated with the statutory park-model recreational vehicle exemption. This is paperwork administration and does not alter the HUD Code, the park-model exemption, or mobile home resident protections.

Bottom line: the key development is the apparent absence of publicly documented compliance with HUD’s September 9 ROAD Act deadline. Funding for PRICE and most other new initiatives remains unsettled as the September 30 fiscal-year deadline approaches.