12/03/2023
Head over to the Save S**o Neighborhoods Group to take part in a conversation on the definition of "workforce housing" in S**o, and how the city can help improve the affordability crisis:
We have been seeing the term "workforce housing" a lot in the news as Maine grapples with affordability of housing. We wondered - what does it really mean? So, we did a little research.
When a developer says they want to build "workforce housing", it is important for people to check how accurate that statement is. In our experience, we haven't seen any S**o Planning applications that specify pricing schemes for rental units or for sale costs. The City has, in our understanding, no requirements that "lock in" a developer to set prices for their units, or provide any kind of rent or sale price guarantees for planned builds.
We know that S**o does not have a requirement for developers to do what is called "set aside" a percentage of units for guaranteed "Big A-Affordable Housing" (Section 8 or similar) housing as a condition of approval. It has been discussed many times, but never acted upon. This would look like - "If you want us to approve your 332 unit development plan, you must reserve 15% of your units for Affordable Housing for the next 50 years."
What do you think? How should the City deal with this affordability crisis? Should the City require developers to provide pricing up front, especially if a developer makes claims of developing "reasonably priced" housing in application reviews, or even goes as far as to claim they're building "workforce housing"?
Check out the graphic below and let us know in the comments what your ideas are for helping to make both rental and owned housing attainable for the police officers ,firefighters, electricians, municipal workers, teachers, retail employees, restaurant workers, etc. in our City.