04/26/2026
DEMOCRATS and MEDIA NEED TO STOP—As we just learned from AI—Check this out:
Here at NMPJ, we just now posed this question to Artificial Intelligence:
“If your constant message, every single day,
several times a day, from multiple sources, for
3,965 consecutive days, is that one specific
individual is ‘Hi**er,’ ‘Totalitarian,’ ‘a ra**st,’ a
‘pe*****le,’ and “a traitor,’ could that inspire one or
two people out of a population 340,000,000?”
Here’s what AI told us:
Based on psychological theories, media studies, and research on disinformation, a consistent, long-term campaign of extreme, targeted accusations (e.g., comparing an individual to Hi**er, claiming he is a pe*****le, ra**st, and traitor) daily for over a decade (3,965 days) could highly likely inspire one or two people out of a population of 340 million to take extreme action.
▪️From the National Institutes of Health (NIH):
▪️Key Findings on Why This Inspires Action:
▪️THE ILLUSORY TRUTH EFFECT
Repeatedly hearing a statement makes it easier to process, which the human brain interprets as a sign of truth, regardless of whether the statement is factually correct.
Research shows that even false statements, when repeated, become perceived as increasingly true over time. �
▪️STOCHASTIC TERRORISM/RADICALIZATION
While most people will not act, high-frequency extremist messaging directed at a specific target increases the likelihood that a small number of volatile individuals will believe the accusation and take action, even if the influencer does not directly tell them to do so. �
▪️PROCESSING FLUENCY
The sheer volume of 3,965 days (over 10 years) of repeated accusations means the messaging becomes part of the informational landscape for consumers.
As cognitive load increases, individuals often rely on this "processing fluency" rather than critically analyzing the information.�
 ▪️HIGH VOLUME REPETITION
Studies in cognitive science suggest that while the largest increase in perceived truth comes from hearing a statement for the second time, continued, long-term exposure keeps the falsehoods active and believable to a segment of the audience. �
▪️ TARGETED EXTREMISM
Given a population of 340 million, even a minuscule probability of influencing someone—far less than 0.0001%—could result in one or two individuals choosing to act on the misinformation.
▪️ CONCLUSIONS ▪️�
In summary, the combination of extreme accusations, relentless daily repetition over many years, and a massive population makes it statistically and psychologically plausible that at least one or two people would be moved to extreme behavior.
After all, if there is an individual who is:
▪️a Hi**er clone
▪️a proven totalitarian
▪️a child-molesting ra**st
▪️intent on destroying the US Constitution
▪️destroying the very foundations of American
democracy and our way of life
▪️actively planning concentration camps for people
who disagree with him
Is it not every citizens duty to be part of eliminating this individual?

The Democrats and their ardent, extremely committed allies throughout American media must stop. They must try to move themselves back to a time when normal behavior and normal rhetoric was, well, “normal.”
And responsible leaders in both the Democratic Party and the mainstream media—if there are any anywhere—must step forward and say “enough.”
___________________________
MS NOW ABC News CBS News NBC News The New York Times Washington Post Bloomberg