05/29/2026
Quorum Court UPDATE from Tuesday 5/26/26 meeting
Thanks to all who signed the PMCC circulated petition. We received over 140 signatures within 6 days which were sent directly to each Justice of the Peace ahead of their 6pm meeting 5/26 and representative of a majority of the 15 JP districts in Pulaski County.
The meeting began with an unscheduled panel of speakers organized by Judge Barry Hyde and was an "info-mercial" to the quorum court and the public on the subject of data centers, particularly the AVAIO data center planned near Wrightsville in unincorporated Sweet Home. The panel included Chamber of Commerce, Entergy, Central Arkansas Water, and AVAIO.
Here are results regarding the petition:
1. WIN: the court thankfully failed to pass the quarterly planning board meetings which would have been in addition to their monthly. PMCC pledges to continue to advocate for the Planning Board meeting time to change from the outdated 1948-set time of 2pm to a time later in the day for the working public to be able to attend. Stay tuned.
This ordinance required 10 votes to pass and received 9 = FAIL = WIN FOR THE VOTERS
Sponsors of the ordinance were: Justices Steven Person (district 5) , Natalie Capps (district 2), Patricia Young-Baker (district 10)
Here’s how the Quorum Court voted:
Voted in the public's interest (thank you): Rebekah Davis (district 1), Kathy Lewison (district 3), Julie Blackwood (district 4), Curtis Keith (district 8, Luke McCoy (district 12)
Voted in the interest of unelected bureaucrats; namely planning board commissioners and planning staff: Natalie Capps (district 2), Steven Person (district 5), Donna Massey (district 6), Dianne Curry (district 7), Tina Ward (district 9), Patricia Young-Baker (district 10), Phil Stowers (district 13), Paul Elliott (district 14), Staci Medlock (district 15)
Voted on the fence as "Present": Aaron Robinson (district 11)
2. NO ACTION TAKEN: No one made a motion to recall the data center resolutions and ordinances sponsored by Justice Julie Blackwood (district 4) back from the planning board. Therefore the planning board will be leading the effort and hosting public hearings at dates and times to be announced regarding the data center land use regulations communities are calling for. It is unclear if staff will have outside experts guiding the process.
3. TEMPORARY SETBACK: a 12-month moratorium (pause) on data center application processing by Pulaski County sponsored by our Justices Rebekah Davis (district 1) and Tina Ward (district 9) FAILED for two observed reasons:
First: AN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION WAS SHARED BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY LAST MINUTE at the meeting (there was no prior communication to our Justice Rebekah Davis the sponsor) which he said could cause the county to be sued. This flipped votes from "yes" to "no" as at least one Justice indicated this changed a planned "yes" to "no". Justice Davis had no time to research the opinion to refute it.
Second: There was also a last minute "grandfathering" amendment which was sponsored by Justice Phil Stowers (district 13) who stated he would vote for the moratorium if this was added. This amendment request came from an outside attorney group asking the county attorney that it be added PMCC has learned.
This amendment was approved by a majority of Justices upon warnings by the County Attorney who indicated the county is less likely to be sued if they added it. The amendment excluded the 2024 AVAIO submitted application for the data center near Wrightsville in the unincorporated community of Sweet Home. This was not a welcomed amendment and would not have helped the people of Sweet Home who will be living next to a data center the county kept under wraps for at least two years. This amendment is arguably unconstitutional according to comments made after the vote by Pulaski County Candidate for Judge Wendell Griffen (former circuit judge).
With or without the amendment, the moratorium could have paused future data center applications for 12 months.
This ordinance required 10 votes to pass and received 9 = FAIL = SETBACK FOR THE VOTERS
Sponsors of the moratorium we wanted passed (without the amendment): Rebekah Davis (district 1), Tina Ward (district 9)
Sponsor of the unwelcomed amendment: Phil Stowers (district 13)
The amendment was voted to be added by a majority of the court. Then they voted on the moratorium with the added amendment next.
Here’s the how the Quorum Court voted on the moratorium with the added amendment (it wasn't optimal, but we wanted it to pass to at least give a 12 month pause on future data center applications from being processed until land use regulations can be established):
Voted in the public's interest (thank you): Rebekah Davis (district 1), Natalie Capps (district 2), Kathy Lewison (district 3), Julie Blackwood (district 4), Steven Person (district 5), Donna Massey (district 6), Paul Elliott (district 14), Staci Medlock (district 15),
Voted for an unknown outside party who requested the amendment: Phil Stowers (district 13)
Voted in a way that benefits data centers probably out of fear of being sued: Dianne Curry (district 7), Curtis Keith (district 8 ), Patricia Young-Baker (district 10), Aaron Robinson (district 11)
Voted on the fence as "Present": Tina Ward (district 9), Luke McCoy (district 12)
Here is where you can find who your JP is:
https://agio.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8bd86088bb7b4068a69db5f6567a8d0b
Click on the "Justice of the Peace Districts" in the pop up menu on the right side of screen
type your address on the top left of the screen
zoom out to see your JP district
If you don't like how they vote or have other comments regarding their job performance, you need to let them know by sending an email and definitely by your vote next time they are on the ballot.
Here are the emails for each JP:
district 1 [email protected]
district 2 [email protected]
district 3 [email protected]
district 4 [email protected]
district 5 [email protected]
district 6 [email protected]
district 7 [email protected]
district 8 [email protected]
district 9 [email protected]
district 10 [email protected]
district 11 [email protected]
district 12 [email protected]
district 13 [email protected]
district 14 [email protected]
district 15 [email protected]
Stay tuned for updates via email, Facebook, and our website.