Kettle Range Conservation Group

Kettle Range Conservation Group Our mission is to defend wilderness, protect biodiversity, and restore ecosystems of the Columbia River Basin.

May 15th is Endangered Species Day! We invite you to honor this day by taking action to stop an unprecedented threat to ...
05/14/2026

May 15th is Endangered Species Day!

We invite you to honor this day by taking action to stop an unprecedented threat to endangered species here in NE Washington and across the nation.

You can help - See action items below!

NE Washington with its mountain, forest, and shrub-steppe habitats is home to several federally and state-listed endangered species. Key species include the Grizzly Bear, Canada lynx, Gray Wolf, Woodland Caribou, Fisher, and Sharp-Tailed Grouse. These species are under threat from habitat loss, fragmentation, and historical persecution.

In honor of Endangered Species Day- we are celebrating grizzly bears. A small, threatened population of 50–60 grizzly bears live in the Selkirk Mountains of Northeast Washington, Northern Idaho, and British Columbia, with roughly a dozen residing in Washington. The Salmo-Priest Wilderness is a key area for these bears, which are distinct from the population being reintroduced to the North Cascades.

The Selkirk Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone includes the Colville National Forest east of the Pend Oreille River and Highway 31. In addition to this small Selkirk grizzly population in the northeast corner of Washington, grizzly bears have also been documented in the “Wedge” area approximately 50 miles to the west between Highway 395 and the Columbia River near the Canadian border. These are likely transboundary bears who primarily reside in British Columbia.

Grizzly bears are listed as an endangered species by the state of Washington (designated in 1980) due to their critically low populations and absence from most of their historic habitat. Once numbering 50,000-100,000 strong, fewer than 2,000 grizzly bears now survive in the Lower 48 states and occupy less than 2% of their former range.

Actions to Take:

1) Help Protect Grizzly Bears- Visit: https://www.bearsbelong.com/send-message-esa

2) Protect the Endangered Species Act. The ESA -around since 1973- has a near-perfect record of preventing extinction, with 99% of species listed under the Act having survived and hundreds on the path to recovery. A dangerous piece of legislation is moving through Congress — and it threatens to tear apart the Endangered Species Act.

Oppose the ESA Amendments Act (H.R. 1897)

The ESA Amendments Act is a short-sighted attempt to rewrite the Endangered Species Act, putting powerful industry interests ahead of smart, science-based protections for our most vulnerable wildlife.

04/27/2026

Great articles published by the Port Townsend and Jeffereson County Leader newpaper.
Please follow the links.

Today, we celebrate cougars. The Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader newspaper published a 3-part series by Scott Doggett who investigated cougar science and management in Washington State and the fear and politics in predator management. The author states: Research over the past several decades has shown that killing more cougars doesn’t reduce conflict; instead, it makes it worse. Hunting removes dominant adult males and replaces them with younger, more reckless cats that are more likely to attack livestock and cause complaints.
Part 1 of 3
Washington cougar policy shaped by fear not facts
https://ptleader.com/articles/columns/washington-cougar-policy-shaped-by-fear-not-facts/

Part 2 of 3
A room full of fear changed everything for the cougars
https://ptleader.com/articles/columns/a-room-full-of-fear-changed-everything-for-the-cougars/

Part 3 of 3
Cougar science sidelined as pressure takes over
https://ptleader.com/articles/columns/cougar-science-sidelined-as-pressure-takes-over/

Editor’s Note: This is the final part of a three-part series. By the time Washington’s cougar debate reached its peak intensity, the conflict was no longer limited to public meetings or policy discussions. It had infiltrated the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife itself. What had started...

*****   The Endangered Species Act Attack – Updates ******UPDATES on the Endangered Species ActGood news….bad news…good ...
04/05/2026

***** The Endangered Species Act Attack – Updates ******

UPDATES on the Endangered Species Act

Good news….bad news…good news…
The saga continues of the Trump administration’s relentless actions to dismantle the Endangered Species Act. This turbulent ride is characterized by a series of aggressive regulatory rollbacks, the historic reconvening of a powerful "death warrant" committee, and the undaunted response (litigation) cycle by resolute advocacy groups- defending wildlife. The Endangered Species Act has prevented more than 99 percent of listed species from going extinct. It is popular, with 90% of Americans supporting the Act.

The Good:
March 30th, 2026
Trump's Endangered Species Act rollbacks have been overturned.
A federal court ruled that – four key provisions that implement the Act (issued in 2019) under the first Trump administration - are unlawful. The Endangered Species Act is our county’s most successful law for preventing extinction and protecting wildlife. Transparency and oversight are critical to the Endangered Species Act’s success. This is a huge win for endangered species across the country.

The Bad:
March 31st, 2026
Extinction Committee’ Allows Oil Drillers to Ignore Species Protections in Gulf of Mexico
This week the Federal Endangered Species Committee – also known as the Extinction Committee or God Squad, met behind closed doors and voted unanimously to allow an exemption to the Endangered Species Act – waiving environmental rules- allowing offshore oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. This vote was pushed forward- without any regard for the imperiled wildlife - that rely on these waters for survival. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth requested this exemption “for reasons of national security.” This is the first meeting- in over three decades - of the Extinction Committee named as such because its members have the extraordinary power to decide whether our nation’s endangered wildlife live or die and suffer extinction. Advocacy groups are working tirelessly to safeguard the Endangered Species Act.

The Good:
April 2nd, 2026
Gulf & Environmental Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Decision to Exempt All Gulf Oil-and-Gas Activities from Endangered Species Act
Gulf and environmental groups sued the Trump administration over its decision to strip Endangered Species Act protection from imperiled species threatened by oil-and-gas offshore drilling activities in the Gulf of Mexico. “In a moment of self-made crisis, the Trump administration has decided to manipulate the law to entrench offshore oil drilling in the Gulf for decades to come, even if it destabilizes entire ecosystems that communities and businesses depend on,” said Steve Mashuda, Managing Attorney for Earthjustice’s Oceans Program.

Read more….

March 30th, 2026
Federal Court Strikes Down President Trump’s Attacks Against Endangered Species Act, Restores Bedrock Environmental Law to Pre-Trump Status— Ruling derails future attempts to weaken law
OAKLAND, CA —
A federal court struck down President Trump’s attacks against the Endangered Species Act (ESA), restoring key values of the bedrock environmental law to the status it held for decades before the first Trump administration attacked the bedrock environmental law. After a seven-year legal saga, the Northern District of California Court found that a series of regulations from 2019 and 2024 were in clear violation of the statute, and ordered those regulations immediately vacated. The ruling will derail ongoing efforts by the current Trump administration to further weaken the ESA.
The ruling reaffirms that federal agencies must use the best available science when assessing harm to species, they cannot ignore incremental harm to critical habitat, and the agencies must firmly commit to any measures relied upon to reduce harm to imperiled plants and animals.
Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, and WildEarth Guardians, represented by Earthjustice, challenged regulations issued seven years ago by the first Trump administration, as well as inadequate rules issued under President Biden.
“Extinction is forever, and today’s ruling strikes down regulations that deprived vulnerable species of a last chance at survival,” said Ben Levitan, Earthjustice senior attorney. “This ruling sends a strong signal to the Trump administration that its pending plans to further weaken the rules will violate the law.”
“For more than 50 years, the Endangered Species Act has been one of the most successful conservation laws we have,” said Joanna Zhang, endangered species advocate with WildEarth Guardians. “This victory gives vulnerable species and the ecosystems we all rely on a chance to recover in the face of the climate crisis and relentless pressure from extractive industries.”
“I’m thrilled the court rejected these efforts to gut endangered species protections and eviscerate a law Americans love,” said Ryan Shannon, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “We’re in an extinction crisis that demands urgent action to prevent thousands of animal and plant species from disappearing forever. Trump is hellbent on serving corporations at the expense of endangered wildlife, but thankfully the law protects these critters and the places they live. Now Trump must obey it.”
“Today’s ruling reversed changes aimed at gutting some of the Endangered Species Act’s most important protections for the habitats of species facing extinction,” said Sierra Club Senior Attorney Karimah Schoenhut. “Thankfully, the court rejected this unlawful attempt to allow the piecemeal destruction of critical habitat and to undermine the Act’s protections against jeopardizing protected species.”
Background: The first Trump administration carried out a series of unprecedented attacks against the Endangered Species Act, prompting a legal fight that culminated in today’s ruling.
During the Biden administration, some of the first Trump administration’s damage was undone through new regulations. But those efforts ultimately fell short of restoring the ESA to its full protection purpose. The legal fight went on.
Though most of this set of regulations have been invalidated, the current Trump administration has again proposed rules that undermine protections for threatened and endangered species. Any new regulations will need to consider the Court’s reasoning today before they are finalized.
The Trump administration has also proposed to reverse a 50-year understanding of the statute that could open the door to widespread destruction of habitat for threatened and endangered wildlife. This change may be finalized soon, even though it has been met with fierce public and scientific opposition.
Additionally, President Trump is convening a committee of his own appointees to effectively decide the fate of endangered species for projects whose approvals would otherwise violate the law. Tomorrow, the Trump administration will bring together its “Extinction Committee” for the first time to potentially override protections under the Endangered Species Act for all oil and gas activities in the Gulf of Mexico, which could drive the Gulf’s most imperiled creatures, including sea turtles, whales, fish, rays, and corals, to extinction.
Trump also issued an executive order on the first day of his new term declaring an “energy emergency” that specifically named the ESA, setting up an effort to eventually subvert the law in the name of fossil fuel extraction and private corporate interests.
Meanwhile, the ESA remains one of the most popular and effective conservation laws ever enacted in the U.S., with 84 percent of Americans in support of it today. The ESA has had a 99% success rate, saving numerous species including the bald eagle, Florida manatee, the gray wolf, and many other iconic animals that would have otherwise disappeared forever. Humans also benefit immensely from the bedrock environmental law, which helps keep ecosystems intact that impact everything from agriculture to clean water access and disease prevention.
The ESA is needed more than ever today, with over one-third of plants and animals in the U.S. at risk of extinction, in large part due to human activities that destroy habitat, overexploit and kill species, pollute water systems, and speed up climate change.
*************************************************
March 31, 2026
‘Extinction Committee’ Allows Oil Drillers to Ignore Species Protections in Gulf of Mexico
Panel of appointees aligns with “national security” rationale from Secretary of Defense
Contacts
Jackson Chiappinelli [email protected]
Washington, D.C. —
This morning, for the first time in 34 years, a committee of political appointees with the power to condemn imperiled species to extinction met to review a request for an exemption to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The panel — formally known as the Endangered Species Committee but sometimes referred to as the “Extinction Committee” or the “God Squad” — voted to grant the exemption. The committee has only convened three times since Congress amended the Act in 1978 to consider exemptions in extreme circumstances where there was an irreconcilable conflict between a project and the survival of a species.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth asked for the meeting to be held to exempt all offshore oil-and-gas drilling activities across the Gulf of Mexico from the ESA, citing reasons of “national security.” Oil production in the Gulf is not currently constrained by the ESA. No permits have been denied, nor have any development plans been rejected, due to the law. Even oil drillers recently told a federal court that current protocols — which already lead to widespread injury, harassment, and loss of endangered marine life — are not causing disruption to their operations. The unprecedented blanket exemption could serve as a death sentence for already imperiled marine life including whales, sea turtles, manatees, fish, rays, corals and birds.
Steve Mashuda, Managing Attorney for Earthjustice’s Oceans Program, issued the following response:
“The Trump administration is exploiting its self-made gas crisis to get rid of protections for endangered whales and other imperiled species in the Gulf of Mexico. Secretary Hegseth and his Extinction Committee claim this will eventually cut costs for Americans strained by gas prices, but Gulf communities know what unrestrained drilling will really bring: devastating oil spills and the destruction of ecosystems and coastal economies. Earthjustice and our partners will go to court to stop this illegal order.”
Exempting the oil industry’s Gulf of Mexico operations from the Endangered Species Act will not reduce prices at the pump. The U.S. is producing more oil than any nation in history and is the world’s top producer of gas (and is a net exporter of both). The Gulf specifically has seen steady oil-and-gas production and is poised to see an increase given the industry’s push into deeper Gulf waters, where there are more oil deposits, but where extraction becomes exponentially more dangerous.

A Rice’s whale — one of the world’s rarest whales — observed in the western Gulf of Mexico in 2024. The species is the only large whale species that lives year-round in North American waters. (Paul Nagelkirk / NOAA Fisheries - NMFS ESA/MMPA Permit #21938)

********************************************
April 2, 2026
Gulf & Environmental Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Decision to Exempt All Gulf Oil-and-Gas Activities from Endangered Species Act
Jackson Chiappinelli, Earthjustice, [email protected]
Joanie Steinhaus, Turtle Island Restoration Network, [email protected]
Alex Horn, Healthy Gulf, [email protected]
Ginny Roscamp, Sierra Club, [email protected]
Lindsay Tice, Friends of the Earth U.S, [email protected]

Washington, D.C. — Gulf and environmental groups sued the Trump administration over its decision to strip Endangered Species Act protection from imperiled species threatened by oil-and-gas offshore drilling activities in the Gulf of Mexico. The unprecedented blanket-exemption would leave numerous Gulf species and ecosystems unprotected and vulnerable to extinction, including the critically endangered Rice’s whale, sea turtles, fish, rays, corals, and birds.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth invoked a 1978 Endangered Species Act provision that allows an Endangered Species Committee (commonly known as the “Extinction Committee” or “God Squad”) to wipe out protections for imperiled species. Secretary Hegseth directed the small group of President Trump’s appointees to grant the free pass for offshore drillers, citing “national security” reasons even though no oil and gas industry proposals or permits have been denied due to the Endangered Species Act. Offshore drillers even recently told a federal court that current species protections (which still enable imperiled marine life deaths, injury, and harassment) are not disrupting their operations.
The groups — Healthy Gulf, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Friends of the Earth, and Sierra Club, represented by Earthjustice — are suing the Trump administration for abusing the national security exception under the Endangered Species Act, which does not allow the robust review process required under the law to be forfeited or voided.
The groups filed their lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
“In a moment of self-made crisis, the Trump administration has decided to manipulate the law to entrench offshore oil drilling in the Gulf for decades to come, even if it destabilizes entire ecosystems that communities and businesses depend on,” said Steve Mashuda, Managing Attorney for Earthjustice’s Oceans Program. “This ‘go-ahead’ to offshore drillers to extract oil and gas in extremely sensitive ocean areas while killing whales, turtles, and many other species is unnecessary and shameful. This abuse of the law won’t lower gas prices, and it will only sell out the Gulf to an industry that has left some of the worst environmental scars our country has ever seen. We are asking the court to stop this illegal order.”
“The Extinction Committee’s vote to absolve oil and gas companies from adhering to the Endangered Species Act is an unprecedented act that will have disastrous consequences for the Gulf,” said Martha Collins, Healthy Gulf Executive Director. “Communities want greater protections for Gulf species, and this is a clear attempt by the Trump administration to silence those voices.”
“Using war with Iran as cover, the Trump administration has invoked the rarely-used Endangered Species Committee ‘God Squad’ to wage a new war — on endangered sea turtles and whales in the Gulf of Mexico,” said Todd Steiner, founder of Turtle Island Restoration Network.
“The Trump administration is playing god with our most vulnerable wildlife by deciding which endangered species are worth saving and which can be sentenced to extinction to pad oil and gas profits,” said Devorah Ancel, senior attorney with the Sierra Club’s Environmental Law Program. “The Endangered Species Act and the long-needed protections it requires to prevent species’ extinction do not disrupt oil production in the Gulf. We are suing to stop the Trump administration from abusing national security concerns to seek politically motivated exemptions that weaken protections for endangered species nationwide.”
“The Trump Administration’s unprecedented use of the God Squad is rife with illegalities,” said Hallie Templeton, Legal Director for Friends of the Earth. “Public participation has been evaded and a baseless national emergency has been declared without evidence of need or urgency. Meanwhile, the critically endangered Rice’s whale – of which only 51 remain on the planet – has been placed in the administration’s crosshairs, all to benefit oil and gas interests. The buck stops here: we are holding the Extinction Committee and involved officials accountable in court and are confident that justice will continue to carry the day.”
Background
The Endangered Species Committee has only convened three times since Congress amended the Act in 1978 to allow for exemptions in extreme circumstances where species protection was irreconcilable with a particular project. Only twice has it decided to exempt specific projects from Endangered Species Act protections — and one of those decisions (regarding spotted owls) was subsequently overturned in court.
In every prior case, there has been a singular project up for consideration by the committee, and a single species whose fate was hanging in the balance. Yesterday’s meeting marks the first time the committee has ever considered a request based on “national security” concerns. It is also the first time that an exemption has been granted for an entire industry, for sweeping actions that have the potential to affect at least 20 endangered and threatened species. Rice’s whales, the only whales that live year-round in the Gulf, have already diminished to around 50 individuals and could become the first human-caused extinction of a whale species in recorded history.
The Endangered Species Act has long served as a bulwark against rampant destruction of species habitat, preserving ecosystems that keep marine life alive and that humans rely on for everything from food to economic security to recreation to cultural practices.
President Trump has repeatedly attacked or attempted to circumvent the Endangered Species Act. Just this week, a federal court struck down a series of regulations from the first Trump administration, restoring key values of the bedrock environmental law.

Excellent statement in the Senate by Senator Whitehouse on the importance of the Endagereged Speices Act. We're Really R...
03/24/2026

Excellent statement in the Senate by Senator Whitehouse on the importance of the Endagereged Speices Act.

We're Really Running Wildlife Off of the Planet": Sen. Whitehouse on Threats to Endangered Species
Link to YouTube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kwp4JFEH2w&t=8s
“There is a graph that shows the biomass of mammals on planet earth, and the whole graph is filled with images of cattle, goats, sheep, and of horses. All human managed livestock. Down at the very bottom corner is this tiny little remaining quadrant for all other living species. We are running wildlife off the planet. There is value in avoiding the unnecessary extinction of species that exist”. Senator Whitehouse
The Endangered Species Act protects species from extinction. Defend, Support and Protect the Endangered Species Act.

03/07/2026

DON"T LET THE FOREST SERVICE LIMIT PUBLIC COMMENT IN FUTURE PROJECTS: Please send comment by Monday night!

Comments needed by Monday March 9th 9pm
The United States Forest Service has proposes changes to its rules that would dramatically limit the public’s ability to advocate and protect our national forests - our public lands!
This rule will reduce the ability for the public to comment on forest management proposals:
• Environmental Assessment (EA): Reduced from 30 days → 10 days.
• Environmental Impact Statement (EIS): Reduced from 45 days → 20 days.
• Prohibit any time extensions to these newly shortened comment periods.
• Limit length of public comments for EAs (15 pages) and EISs (30 pages)
• Shorten the time the Forest Service has to respond to public comments and limit the length of its responses.
• Eliminate the opportunity to comment of draft environmental analysis while removing the public disclosure requirement for draft analysis.
• Impose all of these changes upon the Forest Service without evaluating how they will impact the environment.

Does the US Forest Service work for the public? Or the President and timber industry?
Under Donald Trump, the US Forest Service has cut its workforce by 32%.

Comments due March 9th at 9pm PST
Submit comments here:
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FS-2026-0001-0001

Sample Letter:
I’m a frequent user of our National Forests and rely on these lands for recreation, solitude, and connection with healthy ecosystems- ecosystems that make clean air, clean water, and important wildlife. I strongly object to the proposed changes to 36 CFR 218, particularly the page and time limits on public comments and agency responses and the reduced requirements to publish and take comment on all NEPA documents. These changes will make it significantly harder for members of the public like me to meaningfully participate in decisions that affect the forests we use. It’s incredibly important for NEPA documents to be thorough and accurate and these limits prevent careful review and thoughtful feedback, while reducing transparency and weakening decision-making.

The agency’s own analysis shows that staffing shortages and larger project scopes—not public input—are the main causes of fewer projects being done (1). Public participation improves outcomes and is essential for effective public land management, as published by the USGS last year (2). Reducing participation risks further forest degradation, biodiversity loss, and increased wildfire severity; not to mention, further reducing public trust in the agency.

The USDA’s new NEPA rules are a minimum standard, and the Forest Service has strong public support to maintain robust opportunities for public participation. I urge the USFS to retract these proposed rules and make no changes to 36 CFR 218. Or that the agency issue an EIS for the express purpose of gathering public opinion on what, if any changes should be made, while complying with applicable laws and regulations.

It’s more trouble to consult with the public than ignore them, but that is what you were hired for. Thank you for considering my comment.

1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvaa016
2. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/addee5

Additional Information:
Consider using the following points to support your request:

Analysis shows that lack of staffing and larger scale projects are the reason for fewer projects, not burdensome NEPA analysis (1).

Less public participation leads to worse decision making and reduced capacity. The government's own analysis shows that public participation has been proven to improve decision making and is a requirement for effective management of public land (2)(3).

The problem is too much, not too little active management – worsening forest health by reducing fire resilient old-growth and mature forest, increasing fragmentation, introducing highly flammable invasive species, releasing stored carbon – all contributors to fast-moving, destructive fires and loss of biodiversity (4).

1 – Forrest Fleischman, Cory Struthers, Gwen Arnold, Mike Dockry, Tyler Scott, US Forest Service Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act: Fast, Variable, Rarely Litigated, and Declining, Journal of Forestry, Volume 118, Issue 4, July 2020, Pages 403–418, https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvaa016

2 – National Research Council. 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12434

3 – Stava, A., Thogmartin, W. E., Merideth, R., Bethard, S., Currim, F., Derbridge, J. J., Emerson, K., Laparra, E., Lien, A., McGovern, E., Pidot, J., Miller, M., Romero Carvenas, K., Smith, B., Winnebald, C., & Lopez Hoffman, L. (2025). Quantifying the substantive influence of public comment on United States federal environmental decisions under NEPA. Environmental Research Letters, 20, 074028. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/quantifying-substantive-influence-public-comment-united-states-federal-environmental

4 – DellaSala, D. A., Ingalsbee, T., & Hanson, C. T. (2018). Everything you wanted to know about wildland fires in forests but were afraid to ask: Lessons learned, ways forward (Wildfire Report 2018). Geos Institute.https://geosinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/wildfire-report-2018.pdf

CELEBRATE WORLD WILDLIFE DAY!March 3rd is World Wildlife Day!Watch Celebrations Worldwide  https://www.youtube.com/watch...
03/03/2026

CELEBRATE WORLD WILDLIFE DAY!

March 3rd is World Wildlife Day!
Watch Celebrations Worldwide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcmvUXbdobU
World Wildlife Day is celebrated every year on 3 March to celebrate wild animals and plants and recognize the unique roles and contributions of wildlife to people and the planet.
image.png

Welcome to the United Nations World Wildlife Day 2026 (WWD2026) VIRTUAL Celebration taking place on 3 March 2026, 13:30 - 15:30 (CET/Central European Time). ...

02/27/2026

OPINION: Washington’s Fish and Wildlife Commission is being judged by flawed assumptions
Feb 26, 2026
8
4-minute read
Share Story

The Rucklehaus Report called the commission dysfunctional. In fact, it’s being mismanaged and politicized from the top
Two bald eagles chirp at each other
Getting chirpy: Washington’s fish and wildlife stewards might be arguing about the wrong things. Photo: Paul Thomson

By Susan Kane-Ronning, Ph.D. February 26, 2026. Washington’s Fish and Wildlife Commission remains under extraordinary scrutiny. An investigation into the political connections of several commissioners launched in 2025 at the governor’s direction has stretched into 2026, consuming public resources and casting a long shadow over the work of a citizen commission charged with stewarding one of the state’s most vital public trusts.

The justification for this prolonged examination rests heavily on the Ruckelshaus Center report—an expensive, methodologically weak review built on interviews with roughly 100 hand-selected individuals.

That report labeled the commission “dysfunctional,” a characterization repeated in headlines, legislative conversations and executive decision-making.

The governor’s office and WDFW continue to rely on a flawed and biased narrative that blames the commission—while ignoring the real sources of instability.

Earlier this month, Fish and Wildlife Commissioner John Lehmkuhl, a retired wildlife biologist and lifelong hunter, published an op-ed in Spokane’s Spokesman-Review, rebutting the “dysfunction” narrative.

Lehmkuhl laid out, in detail, the commission’s accomplishments, its adherence to public process and its ability to navigate complex and often contentious policy terrain. His conclusion was unambiguous: the commission is functioning, and claims to the contrary misrepresent both its record and its mandate.

Washingtonians want commissioners who prioritize conservation and science—not ideological brinkmanship.

Why is the Ruckelshaus framing still driving executive action?

Gov. Bob Ferguson relied on the Ruckelshaus Report when he abruptly revoked the commission appointments of Dr. Tim Ragen and Lynn O’Connor shortly after taking office in January 2025.

Dr. Ragen, former executive director of the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission, brought unmatched scientific expertise at a time when Southern Resident orcas teeter on the brink of extinction. O’Connor, a former park ranger from Ferry County, worked across ideological lines, leasing rangeland to ranchers while advancing forest and land conservation.

The removal of both Ragen and O’Connor was framed as a step toward restoring “balance” on the commission. However, instability persists. The governor reinstated commissioners whose conduct and voting records had already contributed to public mistrust and escalating conflict, behavior that undermines the very stability he claimed to seek. In recorded commission meetings, Commissioner Molly Linville has unfairly criticized fellow commissioners, warned that science-based rulemaking would provoke a “firestorm” and openly framed policy debates as battles to appease a small minority who “go to war” when they feel powerless.

Following her comments, other commissioners were subjected to threats and harassment—an outcome that should concern anyone who values democratic governance.

These actions are documented in public records.

Instead of confronting such conduct and the special interest groups that support it, the governor’s office and WDFW continue to fixate on a report whose conclusions were never representative of the broader public and whose methodology has been widely questioned.

The Ruckelshaus Report has been treated as supreme fact, while the consequences of appointment decisions made in its shadow go largely unexamined.

The Fish and Wildlife Commission exists to represent all Washingtonians—not just the narrowest and loudest interests.

Fewer than 4% of Washington residents hunt, and only a fraction of those hunt large predators.

By contrast, the overwhelming majority of residents value wildlife for ecological, cultural and intrinsic reasons. Multiple surveys have shown that Washingtonians want commissioners who prioritize conservation, biodiversity and science—not ideological brinkmanship.

At a time of accelerating biodiversity loss and climate disruption, Washington cannot afford to misdirect the source of its governance challenges. Perpetuating a flawed report while yielding to destabilizing influences does not create balance. It entrenches systemic dysfunction.

The state faces a choice. It can continue to scrutinize the Fish and Wildlife Commission through the distorted lens of a flawed report—or it can confront the real causes of instability: a review process that failed to reflect public values and expose true problems, and executive decisions that reward the very behaviors fueling division and dysfunction.

Amid the greatest need for preservation and advocacy, Washington’s fish and wildlife require leadership guided by evidence, integrity and accountability. The Fish and Wildlife Commission deserves an opportunity to govern without political maneuvering.

The views expressed in this article belong solely to its author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of anyone else associated with Columbia Insight.

Print
Email

Susan Kane-Ronning
Susan Kane-Ronning, Ph.D., is a licensed psychologist from Whatcom and Chelan counties in Washington. She is an environmental activist who participates in several groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, People for Lake Whatcom and Whatcom Forest Watch.

Address

Republic, WA
99166

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Kettle Range Conservation Group posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Kettle Range Conservation Group:

Share