05/22/2026
News from Jones Street with Jackson Cozort, RGEA Director of Government Relations: Although Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger and House Speaker Destin Hall publicly announced an agreement two weeks ago on the major budget and tax framework items, North Carolina remains the only state that has not passed a budget as we head into the Memorial Day weekend. While leadership has acknowledged an agreement on the larger issues, no final conference budget document has yet been officially released.
Still, House leadership continued holding strong during negotiations on inflation relief for retirees and successfully secured a 2.5% one-time bonus for state retirees after the original Senate proposal did not include any pension supplement. While many retirees understandably continue advocating for a true recurring Cost-of-Living Adjustment, it is important to recognize that this was not a partisan disagreement this year. Neither the House, Senate, nor Governor’s proposed budgets included a permanent recurring COLA. Although Governor Stein’s proposal did include a larger one-time bonus than the House version, it also stopped short of a true COLA because of the extraordinary long-term cost associated with adding recurring pension obligations to the budget.
To understand the scale of the challenge, even a permanent 1% COLA would cost the state well over $560 million dollars. Why has the cost become so massive? Quite simply, North Carolina now has significantly more retirees drawing benefits than active employees paying into the system. Today there are only around 78,000 active state employees, while there are nearly 280,000 retirees receiving pension benefits. People are also living longer than previous generations, while average pension payouts continue increasing over time. Even though a 2.5% one-time bonus is not a true COLA, it will still likely represent an appropriation exceeding $130 million dollars and will almost certainly become one of the larger individual line items contained anywhere in the final state budget.
None of this changes the reality that retirees continue facing rising healthcare costs, inflation, and increasing financial pressure on fixed incomes. RGEA fully understands those concerns, and our organization will continue fighting for meaningful recurring COLAs and long-term solutions that help restore the purchasing power retirees have steadily lost over time. While the financial challenges surrounding permanent COLAs are very real, that does not mean the conversation ends here, nor does it lessen our commitment to continuing that fight moving forward.
As our local government members continue asking questions online, we also wanted to provide additional clarity on one of the most common misconceptions surrounding North Carolina’s retirement systems: the management of the Local Government Retirement System and who actually determines local retiree COLAs or bonuses.
It is important to understand that every city, county, and local government in North Carolina is legally required to pass its own balanced budget each year. These budgets are funded locally, not through the state budget, and local employer retirement contributions are paid from those local funds, primarily supported by property taxes and local revenues. Likewise, when pension investment performance falls short of expectations, local governments are ultimately responsible for covering those additional liabilities through increased employer contributions.
Years ago, the General Assembly delegated authority for oversight of the Local Government Retirement System to a Board of Trustees representing various local government constituencies across North Carolina. These Trustees include representatives from county government, municipal government, law enforcement, local employees, retirees, and other local service organizations.
Do these Trustees have the authority to approve COLAs or bonuses for local retirees? The answer is yes, but only within limits established by statute. Those increases may only occur when investment returns exceed certain required funding thresholds.
This is where the role of the State Treasurer becomes critically important. While local governments fund the system itself, investment management of retirement assets falls under the Treasurer’s responsibility. State leaders have recently moved to modernize investment governance through the Investment Modernization Act with the goal of improving long-term investment performance and strengthening the retirement system over time.
In simple terms, local retiree bonuses and COLAs do not come from the state budget. They depend primarily on investment performance, actuarial funding conditions, and decisions made by the Local Government Retirement System Trustees within the framework established by state law.
RGEA has remained focused on the long-term structural issues impacting retiree benefits and retirement stability. We are encouraged that serious conversations are finally taking place surrounding investment performance, modernization, and the long-term sustainability of pension funding. At the same time, we fully recognize that many retirees continue struggling with rising healthcare costs, inflation, and the growing pressure placed on fixed incomes after years without recurring COLAs.
The reality is that meaningful long-term improvements will likely require both stronger investment performance and continued legislative engagement moving forward. While no single budget cycle will solve every challenge facing retirees, maintaining a seat at the table and continuing to push these conversations forward remains critically important for the future financial stability of North Carolina’s retired public servants.
You can find these updates, and previous ones, at rgea.info/news-from-jones-street.
Photo: Ben Humphries / EdNC