06/18/2026
This may be one of the most dangerous proposals you’ve never heard of.
The Trump administration’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), led by Project 2025 architect Russell Vought, is proposing a rule that would fundamentally change how federally funded research is awarded in the United States.
Read that again. Not experts, not a peer review process, not scientific merit allocating funding but political appointees.
This isn’t just about climate science. It could affect everything from cancer research and addiction treatment to wildlife conservation, public health, weather forecasting, and emerging technologies.
For decades, federally funded research has largely been evaluated through peer review, where scientists assess whether a project is rigorous, credible, and likely to advance knowledge. This proposal would fundamentally change that. Research funding could be judged based on whether it aligns with the political priorities of whoever happens to be in power.
If we allow political ideology to dictate which questions can be asked and which findings can be funded, we don’t just undermine science—we undermine our ability to solve problems.
If you’ve ever wondered why attacks on scientists, universities, climate researchers, and public agencies matter, this is why. The goal isn’t just to disagree with science; it’s to control it. If science is going to serve the public, it cannot be controlled by political whims.
The comment period closes July 13th. Submit your comment. Share this post. Encourage others to do the same.
The future of science depends on people speaking up. Link in bio to comment or: https://www.regulations.gov/document/OMB-2026-0034-0001