06/10/2025
The following account is a real-life example of SafeSport experiences drawn from multiple cases. Details that might identify a specific case have been changed.
Here is a SafeSport case wherein an outstanding coach — trusted for years in an inner-city athletic program, with 100% parental consent to his actions on behalf of the team — had his contributions to the sport ruined overnight by a third-party SafeSport report. Without a police report or even questioning the coach, SafeSport issued a ruling of immediate sanctions and declaration of that coach having violated the SafeSport code.
Here's the whole story: The inner-city hockey program in a midwest city was extremely popular with city officials and parents. However, despite its popularity in the community, this program was not well funded; all ice time was donated by the rink, and equipment was acquired by the team thanks to donations. The equipment was safe, but it was not as “cool” looking as that of better-funded programs, whose uniforms and equipment were color coordinated. Still, when it came to competing with other inner-city and surrounding suburban leagues, this patchwork team did very well.
The team’s coach—who was an inner-city minority kid himself years ago—understood the value of the program beyond hockey competition. The athletes in his program learned discipline, teamwork, tolerance, self-esteem, and work ethic from their practices. Teamwork, manners, and sportsmanship were the team values, and everyone on the team played a role in the team’s success.
The patchwork team earned a position in the state final. This meant an overnight hotel stay, bus ride, and food for two days on the road. The families had a meeting with the coach and reviewed the costs involved. The financial burden for these families was a significant sacrifice; however, the intangible cost of not attending, and thus denying these young athletes this once-in-their-teenage-years opportunity, was higher. Hence, this expensive challenge somehow had to be met. The parents suggested bake sales, odd jobs around the neighborhood, trash removal, and anything else that could earn some money for the trip.
The parents also signed a waiver, so the coach served as the chaperone. This was a coed team made up of 10 boys and 2 girls; 6 members would play at the state final. The only question left was about hotel arrangements. When a female chaperone could not be arranged (no family member could afford to miss work), the minority male coach suggested a hotel suite with two bedrooms and a living room. The hockey rink manager offered hotel points, and the suite was booked: two girls in one bedroom, four boys in the other bedroom, and the coach in the living room for one night. With the unanimous agreement of the parents and athletes, the trip was planned.
The team traveled by bus, practiced, and went to the hotel where the two-bedroom suite was their accommodation. At the competition, there was hazing of the team for their piecemeal uniforms and equipment. But when the competition was over, the patchwork team were the winners!
The losing teams were dismayed. One opposing team’s coach dug into the details of the winning team’s travel arrangements. They found out about the hotel accommodations and filed a third-party SafeSport report accusing the patchwork team’s coach of inappropriate conduct, sleeping with his young athletes, and being the only adult in a room with minors under 18 years of age.
SafeSport at once placed sanctions on the patchwork team’s coach, including removing him from his coaching position. This threw the coach into a flurry of questions, trying to find out anything he could about the alleged SafeSport violations when he knew, and the students all knew, that he had done nothing wrong. He had zero resources for representation. Meanwhile, the parents of the athletes supported their coach completely, yet they could do nothing to help him.
The third-party reporting individual made public the SafeSport charge against the patchwork team’s coach. Local hockey associations were shocked and rushed to remove the coach from their organizations at once, whereupon their unsubstantiated decisions also were made public. All of this public airing of a hearsay third-party SafeSport code violation alleging inappropriate conduct with minors—unfounded as it was—resulted in the complete dismantling of the inner-city program. The power of a SafeSport code violation trumped all, regardless of the truth.
The coach was broken spiritually and financially by this false public accusation. He had conducted himself with integrity throughout his life and career and hoped only to help other young athletes grow through sports as he had in his youth.
When a reporter published the facts of the matter, SafeSport reversed itself after a full year of looking into the case. It took another year for the coach’s name to be taken off the public SafeSport list. But the damage to the coach was done: the stigma of a SafeSport code violation was attached to the coach's name on the internet. The coach became depressed under the emotional weight and hopelessness of what turned into a nightmarish and very public two-year ordeal.
Although the coach’s name has been removed from SafeSport’s list of sanctioned individuals, even now local sports groups have yet to see that the third-party SafeSport accusation was nothing more than a losing team’s coach finding a way to remove a better coach and scuttle that coach’s team. To date, local hockey groups have not reinstated the cleared coach to good standing.
This disturbing case raises several key questions:
• What does SafeSport know about the underlying circumstances or motives behind third-party reports?
• How is it possible that a coach in good standing who was smeared by a SafeSport report but had its sanctions reversed is still persona non grata with local associations?
• How does a questionable SafeSport report from an unvetted and possibly nefarious third party outweigh parental consent plus not one single complaint from an athlete on this coach’s team?
To learn more about Athletes Equity Resource Center or to donate, visit
Educate. Support. Empower. Founded to help navigate SafeSport-related challenges. Our Mission The Athletes Equity Resource Center provides informational and educational materials for all parties in cases of alleged abuse or misconduct involving athletes in 51 Olympic sports. Our purpose in offeri...
