07/30/2026
🚨 Wildfire solutions shouldn't come at the expense of California's environment. 🌲🔥
SB 1370 would exempt broadly defined wildfire mitigation projects from many of California's environmental laws, weakening safeguards that protect our forests, waterways, wildlife, air quality, and public health.
Here's what's at stake:
☠️ Allows potentially harmful practices. The bill would allow native tree and plant removal, herbicide applications, and other activities with known environmental and public health impacts to move forward with significantly less environmental review. Herbicides like glyphosate have been linked to cancer, respiratory disease, and neurological disorders and can harm fish, birds, amphibians, and other wildlife.
❓ No requirement that projects are effective. SB 1370 does not require projects to demonstrate that they will actually reduce wildfire risk or be cost-effective, despite many being funded by ratepayers or taxpayers. Research continues to show that some wildfire mitigation strategies can be ineffective, or even harmful, causing the loss of native shrublands and increasing the spread of invasive, highly flammable grasses.
🚫 Limited accountability. The bill provides no clear process to monitor or enforce environmental standards. Because many of the environmental laws agencies rely on for oversight would no longer apply, there is little accountability to ensure projects protect wildlife, waterways, or nearby communities.
California can address wildfire risk while maintaining the environmental protections that safeguard our communities and natural resources. 🌿
📞 Take action: Contact Speaker Rivas and the Assembly Appropriations Committee and urge them to VOTE NO on SB 1370. Tell them California needs wildfire solutions that are effective, accountable, and protective of our forests, water, wildlife, and public health.
💚 Protect California's environment. Protect our communities.