Shannon Lucius Mealer Foundation

12/24/2022

HOMEPAGE
HOME TECH
Google's Sundar Pichai was immediately pounced on in the first question of the antitrust hearing, asking the CEO why Google steals content
Hugh Langley Jul 29, 2020, 2:51 PM
Google CEO Sundar Pichai Alphabet tech antitrust hearing
YouTube/House Judiciary
The Congressional antitrust hearing is underway, and David Cicilline wasted no time in setting the tone with an aggressive line of questioning to Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

High-performance computing can turn everyday professionals into superheroes. Here’s how it can help in healthcare, finance, and the environment.
SPONSOR CONTENT by Microsoft Azure
High-performance computing can turn everyday professionals into superheroes. Here’s how it can help in healthcare, finance, and the environment.

His first question: "Why does Google steal content from honest businesses?"

The question came after Cicilline revealed the committee had spoken to numerous small business who had claimed Google had "stolen content" from them.

Pichai managed to dodge the question by telling Cicilline he disagreed with the "characterization" before Cicilline moved on.

But the opening shot revealed some of the information that the committee's year-long investigation had dug up.

How a public-private partnership is developing zero-carbon technologies for data centers
SPONSOR CONTENT by Vertiv
How a public-private partnership is developing zero-carbon technologies for data centers

"Most Americans believe that when they enter a search query that what Google shows are the most relevant results," said Cicilline. "But increasingly Google just shows whatever is most profitable for Google."

"We have always focused on providing users with the most relevant information," Pichai responded.

Cicilline also specifically brought up Yelp's allegations that Google had threatened to delist its website from search results.

And he referenced a recent report that Google favored its own products in search results.

"Isn't there a fundamental conflict of interest between serving users that want to access the best and most relevant information and Google's business model which incentivizes google to sell ads and keep users on Google's own sites?" asked Cicilline.

It was the first moment that all four CEOs got a sense of what types of questions would be coming their way – and proof that the committee had done their homework.

"The evidence seems very clear to me. As Google became the gateway to the internet, it began to abuse its power and use its surveillance over web traffic to identify competitive threats and crush them. It has dampened innovation and new business growth and has dramatically increased the price of accessing users on the internet, virtually ensuring any business that wants to be found on the web must pay Google a tax," said Cicilline in his closing remarks.

Read next

NOW WATCH: Google's 'see what sticks' approach can leave users skeptical about the longevity of new Google services

Google
Alphabet
Antitrust Investigation

Insider
Business Insider

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google Play
* Copyright © 2022 Insider Inc. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our
Terms of Service
,
Privacy Policy
and
Cookies Policy
Contact Us

Sitemap

Disclaimer

Accessibility

Commerce Policy

Advertising Policies

CA Privacy Rights

Coupons

Made in NYC

Jobs @ Insider
Stock quotes by
finanzen.net

Reprints & Permissions
International Editions:

Insider.com TM Logo
Insider-Inc Logo
Business Insider DE Logo
Tech Insider Logo

12/24/2022

NEWS & POLITICS
CULTURE
FOOD
SCIENCE & HEALTH
LIFE STORIES
VIDEO
ABOUT
Sticky Header
Night Mode
Search
Search...

Contribute
Keep Salon Independent

salon logo
subscribe
4 ways Google is destroying privacy and collecting your data
Google Street View wasn't only taking photographs, and your Android phone can do a lot more than make calls
By STEVEN ROSENFELD
PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 5, 2014 12:50PM (EST)
(AP/Marcio Jose Sanchez)
(AP/Marcio Jose Sanchez)
view in app
save
This article originally appeared on Alternet.

AlterNetNo longer content to vacuum up, scan, index and sell analytics based on the content of our texts, emails, searches, locations and more, Google now has a new target: tapping, mapping and colonizing the networks wiring our lives.

“Google argues that it has the right to collect your most sensitive data, as long as it flows across an open WiFi network,” PrivacySOS.org said last month after Google announced a $3.2 billion acquisition of Nest, which sells WiFi-controlled home heating appliances. “Now do you want to let this company inside your home?”

Advertisement:

“Uhm… I hate to break this to the ACLU—given they’re supposed to be on the cutting edge of the privacy debate—but the thing is, Google’s already in our homes,” commented PandoDaily’s Yasha Levine. “It has been in our homes for a long, long time. And not just in our homes, but at work, in our cars and even when we’re walking down the street.”

“As many have pointed out the privacy concerns of this development are huge,” wrote two other PandoDaily writers, Carmel Deamicus and Michael Carney. “Nest products track detailed information about their users’ movements, in addition to things like a user’s WiFi IP address, and whether the specific address is a home or a business.”

Advertisement:

“The acquisition will help Google close the circle of search, people and goods in a broad Internet of Everything,” wrote Wall Street Journal editor Michael Hickins. “As Aaron Levie, CEO of Box Inc. tweeted, ‘With home automation, self-driving cars, robots, mobile, and life sciences, Google is setting itself up to own the 21st century.’”

Anyone who cares about maintaining some degree of privacy should pay attention. Google has been doing a lot more than its lobbyists and executives have disclosed when defending or promoting its initiatives. Here are four examples that undescrore Google’s corporate ethos that any data it can grab is Google's for the taking.

Advertisement:
1. Street View: not just street mapping. After being sued by 38 states, Google admitted last March that its weird-looking cars outfitted with roof cameras facing four directions were not just taking pictures; they were collecting data from computers inside homes and structures, including “passwords, e-mails and other personal information from unsuspecting computer users,” the New York Times reported.

2. Gmail: prying and spying. This October, a federal judge refused to dismiss a potential class-action lawsuit brought by Gmail users who objected to its practice of analyzing the content of all the messages on its network and selling byproducts to advertisers. Those suing Google said it violated federal wiretap laws.

Advertisement:

This issue isn’t new to Google. In congressional testimony in 2009, Google’s lawyers said its email technology was used for scanning for spam, computer viruses and serving ads “within the Gmail user’s experience.” But last fall, U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh held that Google never told Gmail users that Google would create personal profiles and target users with ads. Nor did people who are not Gmail users, but who were writing to Gmail addresses, agree to let Google collect and parse their messages.

3. Google Safari: not just hunting WiFi. Google’s court record includes more than just grabbing and snatching data. In early 2012, theWall Street Journal broke the story that its software was bypassing security settings for Apple devices using the Safari browser. “Google hated this [Safari’s anti-tracking features] and used a secret code to bypass this security setting,” the blog GoogleExposed wrote. “This exposed millions of Safari users to tracking for months without them even knowing about it.” In August 2012, the Federal Trade Commission fined Google $22.5 million, its largest civil fine, noting that Google also had violated previous privacy agreements.

Advertisement:
4. Android: another data gateway. One year after the FTC fine, ComputerWorld.com’s Michael Horowitz, who writes its Defensive Computing feature, noted Google was back to its old tricks. “Google knows nearly every WiFi password in the world,” he declared, explaining that was the result of backdoor access to hundreds of millions of phones and devices using its Android operating system.

“Sounds great. Backing up your data/settings makes moving to a new Android device much easier,” Horowitz wrote, citing how the company sold this feature to consumers. “It lets Google configure your new Android device very much like your old one. What is not said, is that Google can read the WiFi passwords.” The good news, he said, is that this feature can be turned off. “The bad news is that, like any American company, Google can be compelled by agencies of the U.S. government to silently spill the beans.”

Advertisement:
ComputerWorld was careful not to pick just on Google for domestic spying. DropBox, Microsoft, Apple, Yahoo, FaceBook, Skype—and others—all do pretty much the same thing: read user data and grant government access to it. But Google’s mission, detailed in its patents, stands apart. Its business is based on analyzing user metrics with ever-growing precision, and selling those insights to advertisers.

Thus, the recent handwringing by Google CEO Eric Schmidt that Google—and others—was taken advantage of by America’s top spymasters following Edward Snowden’s still-unfolding National Security Agency whistleblowing, is more than hollow. It’s a farce. The record shows that Google knows exactly what it is doing.

Advertisement:
2014 is likely to be a year where the trade-off for more profits and data for Google will be the loss of privacy. It’s not paranoid to say that Google’s acquisition of Nest is at the cutting edge of colonizing the links between our electronic devices and our lives. The trend of aggregating all the data that’s out there is behind many privacy-invading social media products, such as an app launching this week that literally allows a man to walk into a bar, see a woman and know her name “before he even says hello." Later this summer, Google will start selling its voice- and video-capturing Glass eyewear. Google Glass may be fantastic as a hands-liberating computing platform, but it also enables its users to film, analyze or spy upon others from afar.

It's up to us to say where the red lines should be drawn.

By STEVEN ROSENFELD
Steven Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He has reported for National Public Radio, Marketplace, and Christian Science Monitor Radio, as well as a wide range of progressive publications including Salon, AlterNet, the American Prospect, and many others.

MORE FROM STEVEN ROSENFELD
Related Topics ------------------------------------------
Alternet Android Data Google Privacy Technology
Related Articles
Home About Staff Contact Privacy Terms of Service Archive Go Ad Free
Copyright © 2022 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

DMCA Policy

Privacy SOS The government has gained more and more power to watch us, it has largely kept us in the dark about what it is doing, building a new architecture of domestic surveillance, about which we know very little. What must we know if we want to remain a free society? "PrivacySOS" shines sunlight...

12/24/2022

Systematic theft may be the most anti-competitive and monopolistic practice in which a company can engage. Systematic theft generates an unbeatable cost advantage by avoiding the standard cost of propertied goods for which law-abiding competitors must pay. It creates an unfair, jump-the-gun, time-to-market advantage, by ignoring the rule of law standard of securing permission from property owners before use in the marketplace, a business practice that law-abiding competitors must respect. It spawns and maintains a matchless online index/inventory advantage that no honest competitor could hope to assemble. It anti-competitively undermines property-based business models which compete with Google’s free content model. Lastly, systematic theft is the ultimate predatory practice in that it unlawfully destroys the value of any innovation or creative advantage a competitor may have.

Almost by definition, theft is a quintessential deceptive and unfair business practice under the FTC’s Section 5 antitrust authority. The open question is whether or not the FTC first can recognize, and second prosecute a heretofore unprecedented pattern of predatory behavior – systematic theft for anti-competitive gain.

Last month, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt told the French Newspaper Liberation, “We do not steal,” a reprise of his June claim to the British Daily Mail that “We are a law-abiding company.” It is telling that Google feels compelled to assert what should be a given and never questioned about a major corporation. The reason is that scores of competitors consistently over several years have charged Google with the same illegal practice: theft for anti-competitive advantage. More specifically, Google has repeatedly been sued for repeatedly stealing most every form of property: trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, contact lists, and private information.

Top Patterns of Google Theft

1. Admitted Pattern of Promoting Online Piracy: A) Last August, the DOJ assessed a near-record $500m criminal penalty on Google for systematic and willful aiding and abetting of piracy of non-prescription drugs over a period of several years. The U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case said Google CEO “Larry Page knew what was going on.” B) SIGTARP, the U.S Treasury Department entity responsible for policing TARP fraud continues to investigate Google after Google “suspended advertising relationships with more than 500 Internet advertisers and agents associated with 85 alleged online mortgage fraud schemes and related deceptive advertising.” C) A BBC investigation recently exposed that Google was advertising illegal Olympic Ticket ads for the 2012 London Summer Olympics.

ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

2. Anti-Competitive Pattern of Book Theft: In rejecting Google’s proposed book settlement as a violation of copyright, antitrust and class action law, Federal Judge Chin said Google’s proposed settlement “would give Google a significant advantage over competitors, rewarding it for wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission.” Google continues to systematically copy books without permission from the copyright owner – over fifteen million to date — which fosters an anti-competitively comprehensive search index that no property-respecting search competitor can match.

3. Willful Pattern of Promoting YouTube Video Theft: In the Viacom vs. Google-YouTube $1b copyright infringement case pending appeal, involving the alleged willful facilitation of hundreds of thousands illegally downloaded videos, Federal Judge Stanton said: “…a jury could find that the defendants [Google-YouTube] not only were generally aware of, but welcomed copyright-infringing material being placed on their website.” The appeal will likely hinge on whether the Appeals Court rules that Google engaged in willful blindness, which would abrogate its DMCA safe harbor claim under the Supreme Court MGM vs. Grokster precedent.

4. Willful Pattern of Android Property Infringement: In the Steve Jobs biography, the late Steve Jobs called Android “a stolen product” for stealing the signature pinch and swipe innovations of the iPhone. Oracle sued sued Google for billions of dollars for “knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle’s Java-related property;” an incriminating Google email shows Google’s leadership knew they needed to license JAVA but implicitly decided to steal it.

5. Anti-Competitive Pattern of Stealing Competitors’ Signature Patented-Innovations: A) Google stole the idea and auction method for keyword advertising, the wellspring of its search advertising monopoly, from the keyword advertising inventor and patent holder, Overture, given that Google settled a patent lawsuit with Overture-Yahoo for ~$250 million in order to clear the way for Google’s 2004 IPO. B) Skyhook Wireless sued Google for infringing several WiFi location patents that collectively enable most location-driven mobile applications. Incriminating emails indicate willful infringement by Google’s leadership. C) Last fall, Yelp complained that Google stole Yelp’s restaurant reviews without compensation in order to leapfrog Yelp with Google Places. D) PayPal recently sued Google for theft of their mobile payment trade secrets in a lawsuit against Google Wallet. E) The most recent example of this Google pattern of stealing competitors’ most valuable property is BuySafe’s patent lawsuit against Google’s Trusted Stores program.

6. Extensive Pattern of Content Theft: It is no coincidence that Google has been sued for copyright infringement by most all types of content: wire services, newspapers, broadcasters, movie studios, authors, publishers, visual artists, software providers, photographers, artists, graphic designers, illustrators, and filmmakers.

7. Extensive Pattern of Trademark Theft: Many brands have sued Google for infringing on their trademarks by selling their trademarked brands to competitors as search keyword advertising, i.e. adwords: Rosetta Stone (whose appeal is supported by friend-of-the-court briefs by: Viacom, Ford Motor Company, Carfax, Blue Destiny Records, The Media Institute, ConvaTec, Guru Denim, Monster Cable, PetMed Express and 1-800 Contacts), American Airlines, and Geico. The theft is Google effectively extorts a brand owner to buy their trademarked key word at top price in order to keep it from being used by competitors to steal business leads from trademarked brand names that consumers trust.

8. Pattern of Stealing Contact Lists: A) This week, Google admitted to being caught systematically stealing business contacts from a Kenyan business directory. B) Last year, Google admitted to stealing people’s private email lists in the FTC Google-Buzz privacy settlement where Google admitted that taking people’s private gMail contact list and incorporating them into Google Buzz without their permission was a deceptive and unfair business practice. C) Google StreetView admitted it systematically took WiFi signals of tens of millions of household’s emails and passwords around the world, without their permission, over a period of three years, prompting investigations in 13 countries: U.S., Canada, Germany, France, Switzerland, Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Czech Republic, South Korea, Japan, Australia, and Hong Kong.

In sum, it is sad that the evidence indicates systematic theft is an integral element of Google’s competitive business strategy. The evidence also indicates Google owes much of its success and rapidly spreading market dominance to the ill-gotten unbeatable competitive advantage of systematic theft of others property (trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, contact lists, private information) via at least eight distinct patterns of theft perpetrated over several years time — that collectively indicate that Google’s anti-competitive behavior is systematic, willful and strategic.

The much underappreciated key to Google’s strategy

12/24/2022

What is a radio frequency (RF) attack?
A radio frequency attack is a type of smartphone attack in which the threat actor leverages one or more exploits for a wireless protocol – typically cellular, WiFi, Bluetooth or Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) – to force the phone to connect to untrusted equipment. Such an attack gives the threat actor the ability to extract data from the phone and potentially perform other operations.

How does an RF attack work?
A radio frequency attack against a smartphone will vary based on the protocol and exploit(s) being used. However, all require relatively close proximity to the target.

For cellular communications, a key threat is the IMSI catcher, which is essentially a fake cell tower designed to trick smartphones within range into connecting to it. The IMSI catcher may employ various techniques to do so, such as performing a downgrade attack (to a less-secure protocol like 3G or 4G), masquerading as a neighboring cell tower, operating at a higher-priority frequency than other towers or jamming other frequencies with white noise. Once connected to a targeted smartphone, an IMSI catcher is essentially performing a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, situating itself between the target’s smartphone and their cellular network in order to both remove the phone from the real network and to clone the target’s identity.

A key threat for WiFi is a Karma attack delivered by a rogue access point. A rogue access point is often just a WiFi pe*******on testing device – the WiFi Pineapple is one popular model – that, instead of being used for auditing WiFi networks, is set up to lure unsuspecting smartphones into connecting. In a Karma attack, the rogue AP exploits a basic feature of smartphones (and all WiFi-enabled devices): whenever its WiFi is turned on but not connected to a network, a smartphone broadcasts a preferred network list (PNL), which contains the SSIDs (WiFi network names) of access points to which the device previously connected and is willing to automatically reconnect to without user intervention. After receiving this list, the rogue AP assigns itself an SSID from the PNL, tricking the smartphone into thinking that it’s connected to a familiar WiFi network.

And for Bluetooth, a key threat is the exploitation of one or more Bluetooth vulnerabilities, typically delivered via laptop. After obtaining the MAC address of a smartphone with an active Bluetooth signal in the vicinity, the attacker sends out an exploit tailored to the device’s operating system. A prime example of such a capability is the BlueBorne attack that was first disclosed in 2017. The BlueBorne vulnerabilities allowed the threat actor to take complete control over a targeted device without needing to pair with it or even needing the device to be in discoverable mode.

What are the key risks of an RF attack?
The risks of an RF attack will vary based on the attack method employed.

Key risks of connecting to an IMSI catcher include location tracking (within a defined geographic area) and the leakage of certain types of cellular data (like phone call and text message metadata). In addition, some higher-end IMSI catchers advertise the ability to deliver spyware to the target device.

Key risks of a Karma attack include the leakage of sensitive information (like passwords or credit card details) through eavesdropped traffic, as well as spyware infection.

And for Bluetooth, the risks vary based on the exploit but generally include the leakage of sensitive information and spyware infection.

How can Privoro help you protect yourself from RF attacks?
In general, security solutions don’t have visibility into threats from the RF spectrum, meaning that a smartphone can be attacked without tipping off the user. Users can evade RF attacks by turning off their wireless radios when on the move. However, manipulating software settings is inconvenient and easy to forget to do consistently. We recommend using Vault – our two-in-one RF shielding and audio masking device – as a convenient and highly assured way to block out untrusted wireless signals, especially when in high-traffic areas.

12/24/2022

FOIA Appeals
90 Days
Any adverse determination, including the failure to find material responsive to the request or the denial of access to material, may be administratively appealed.

If, on appeal, the adverse determination is upheld in whole or in part, the requester has the right to seek judicial review of OIG's decision. For FOIA requests, OIG has thirty working days from the date the letter of appeal is received to respond to an appeal of a decision of a refusal to reduce or waive fees.

Denial of Access

The appeal letter should state why the requester disagrees with the determination and provide any additional supporting information. This might include examples of material previously released by the State Department or OIG. Appeals of denial of access must be made in writing and sent to

Chairman, Appeals Review Panel
c/o Information and Privacy Coordinator/Appeals Officer
U.S. Department of State
A/GIS/IPS/PP, SA-2
Washington, DC 20522-8100.

Fee Waiver / Expeditious Handling

The appeal letter should contain as much information and documentation as possible to support the request for a waiver or reduction of fees. OIG's decision to refuse to waive or reduce fees, or grant expedition, may also be appealed by writing to

Chief of the Requester Liaison Division
c/o Information and Privacy Coordinator
U.S. Department of State
A/GIS/IPS/RL, SA-2
Washington, DC 20522-8100.

12/24/2022

No Documentation and capture the flag!

I don't need documentation to support my story. I am gifted with persuadion an able to articulate. Effective and mass communication is a skill of mine. I have been on television, radio and in the news. I am product that is designed to never lose. No retreat and no surrender. I am hero but you have made legendary and I will never die. Yaya forever and so am I, thank you for making in to a patriot and a symbo of democracy. Five years l was asked if I knew what I was up against l chuckled and smiled and said I don't think they know what they are up against. I am prepared for this battle and I need no documentation to convince every one of my story. Mr. Defense aka alphabet, abc.xyz you never imagined that you would see me. There is no place to hide don't be coward face me Money does not make the man my grandmother always said, integrity, respect and pride money can't buy. Thank God for those intangibles and words of wisdom. My grandfather once told me that flag old glory belongs to you go and get it!

12/24/2022

Trial No Jury
So busy watching American citizens that they don't know what's going on. Minerals are being gathered and stored. Corporations are giving away military secrets and committing treason. Planes are crashing and people are vanishing.Inflation is high the stock market is about to crash. You are so concerned with covering up the truth. I have been patient the Art of War and there is no justification or excuse. If you where running an investigation it's been six years which is too long an unconstitutional. My news feeds are a week behind and my emails are being compromised. They wanted to steal my ideas and say that I was crazy and leave me with nothing. They paid almost everybody now the people you paid are backing my story. Discrimination and racism is embedded into this country. Shannon Lucius Mealer will go down in history as the man who stood up for democracy. This is by far one of the biggest American conspiracies. If I am crazy why was I denied disability. Medical records changed or deleted Now my medication is being called into the wrong pharmacy. You want me to lose my sanity. I have prepared so well that I have an invisible army. If I talk to somebody they use intimidation, bullying and try to discredit me. I got a job with no resume and they still convinced my boss to get rid of me. I had people sitting back watching and documenting my story. I even told them to make a movie. I did say mine would probably be better, I kept stats and made predictions and told everybody to just sit back and watch an epic battle that is going down history. David verses Goliath was biblical story. One various many is a true story of a man who stood up for democracy. I have already won and did it with no money. That my friend is funny and ironic.

12/24/2022

Let Freedom Ring!
America the land of opportunity, freedom, democracy, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, justice, the right to privacy, freedom of speech are all rights established by the constitution of the United States of America. We are in a crisis and our rights are being denied by a conglomerate of entities that violates our democracy. Corporate moguls use there money to bribe elected officials who make laws for special interest. Corruption is in almost every facet and institution that effects our pursuit of happiness. The government has three branches which are created to preserve the constitution. The legislative branch which is congress, executive branch which is the president and the judicial branch which is the Supreme Court. When all of these branches fail and do protect the rights of American citizens it is our responsibility and right to stand up. Abuse of power, pardons and unconstitutional executive orders. Laws are being passed with out congress and no judicial review. We live in a democracy not monarchy or king. Institutions which are suppose to protect and serve are being used by the rich and elite as tools of oppression to violate civil liberties, invasion of privacy and our democracy.

For 20 years I have been the victim of these violations, I am egaged in psychological warfare which has no boundaries. My ideas have been stolen along with my proof or documentation. I am thankful and fortunate that I understand the nature of this beast. I have prepared for this war, I made copies of all of my documentation and placed them in numerous locations. I have even allowed serveral to be compromised to prove my theroy. My theroy is that documentation and evidence are taken away, institutions which are designed to protect are rights fail and support special interest. West Virginia Secretary of State, open for business is there motto. They have failed on there purpose and promise to protect the rights of there citizens. They have sided with special interest they have no record of my trademarks and businesses. WV Miners, Cyberkidz and Cyberkids to name few. SLM, SLM Enterprises which was incorprated in West Virginia has no record or documentation. I fortunately have documentation which has not been stolen or taken away. Secretary of State Office is so inconsistent that they used the expiration date despite when my businesses where established. I went through the process of business registrations, trademarks and copy rights and still had my work products taken. I even used legislation or laws designed to protect are democracy such as The Privacy Act and Freedom of Information. My request for information has been denied by local, state and federal government agencies. I have filed numerous complaints and was told by Homeland Security it's not in there jurisdiction. I have even made pleads to the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court which is suppose to protect our constitution. I was told I had to rely on the local courts which are corrupt and have already violated my civil liberties. I have been charged with crimes without evidence and no testimony. I have been assaulted and mentally disrupted by a conglomerate of entities which has violate my civil liberties.

Google has my [email protected] and they refuse to give it to me. I have failed complaints to Google, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Commerce, Secretary of Defense, Attorney Generals Office, Department of Defense, and the United States Inspector General. To make a civil subpoena you to go through California courts which are corrupt. I tried to social media to get people to follow my story. I used Facebook as a tool to express my freedom of speech which I have been denied access and my post deleted which is unconstitutional an invasion of privacy and freedom of speech.

Google is in violation of antitrust laws. They have an illegal monopoly which is against the law. Google hides as a corporate entity but it is being used to violate are democracy. The search engine manipulates and changes history. They hide unfavorable press and media. They protect the rich and elite with fake news and post. For example Nike who supposedly gave 40 million over 4 years to the Jordan Brand for the black community. They even took out all of my community accomplishments and put my criminal background as the first link to discredit me. Everybody knows me which is funny they actually believe I don't talk to nobody. They stole all of my documentation today and left my resume. I am glad they have a sense of humor. I am engaged in phycological warefare and I have already won. To slay a beast, a conglomerate of entities that violates civil liberties and are democracy. Corporate elites hide behind their money and use their influence who are mostly rich executives, buracrates and under links. I have proven my theory corruption is all the way to the top. I want the head of this beast and my trophy will be the constitution. I am champion of democracy!