Redistribution is better than recycling

Redistribution is better than recycling Redistribution occurred naturally in the past. Let us make redistribution great again. This time institutionalised and with money from government.

Feel free to use any idea from this page as if it were your own. We just want to see them put into practice.

This is how a redistribution centre could look like.
01/30/2020

This is how a redistribution centre could look like.

Today's theme: WASTE. "Each time you throw something as garbage, think of where it will finally end up." (WWF)Sadly ther...
01/07/2020

Today's theme: WASTE. "Each time you throw something as garbage, think of where it will finally end up." (WWF)
Sadly there is still a huge number of people who do not recycle their household items, but just put them in the garbage. In some of these cases we even speak of still-good-to-use items. It goes like this: the person wants to create more space in his/her wardrobe; decides that he/she will no longer wear some of the clothes, shoes or purses; goes to a garbage bin only to find out that paper, glass, plastic and metal can be put separately, but clothes/shoes/purses not. So the latter end up in waste.
It would be so much easier if people could take their household items to a redistribution centre. It could be up to such a center to decide whether an item can be reused or should be sent for recycling. Recycling should not be the automatic first option. Redistribution to needy people should always come first.
In the long run such centres would contribute to waste reduction on our planet.

Our goal: that money be allocated from national budgets for the setting up and the functioning, in all cities of a country, of centres responsible for redistributing still-good-to-use domestic items to needy people

The physical problem underlying climate change is very simple: dumping carbon dioxide and other greenhouses gases into the air raises their concentrations in the atmosphere and causes gradual warming.

Let's talk about clothes. We all know by now that fast fashion is the second dirtiest industry in the world, next to Big...
01/05/2020

Let's talk about clothes. We all know by now that fast fashion is the second dirtiest industry in the world, next to Big Oil. And that producing one single T-shirt takes 2,700 litres of water.
What do you do with a pair of jeans which no longer fits you, but which is otherwise still good to wear? What do you do with your children's clothes after your children grow up? What do you do with a person's clothes after that person passes away?
Instead of recycling these clothes (recycling costs money) or, worse, throwing them in the garbage, people all over the world could take these still-good-to-wear clothes to special centres which could redistribute them to needy people.
You, as a donor, would just have to take your clothes to that centre. You, as a beneficiary, would just have to pick up free-of-charge clothing from that centre. The functioning of that centre would be financed from public money.
Because redistribution is so much better than recycling.

By Glynis Sweeny“The clothing industry is the second largest polluter in the world ... second only to oil," the recipient of an environmental award told a stunned Manhattan audience earlier this year. “It's a really nasty business ... it's a mess." While you'd never hear an oil tycoon malign his...

01/04/2020

Dear environmental activists, welcome to this page! Have you ever dreamed of fighting overconsumption? Then you are here at the right place! We do not have answers to all problems, but we do have an idea about how to mitigate the consequences of overconsumption - which is already not bad, don’t you think?
We need to start redistributing a big part of the purchased items from the people who no longer need them to the people who DO need them. There are enough people from both categories. How do we help them find each other? By convincing our governments, our politicians, our decision-makers that an intermediary structure is needed between the donors (the consumers who must dispose of some items they purchased) and the beneficiaries (the people who have financial difficulties). If we take a closer look at our society, we realize that the amount of stuff which is being produced, bought and used is HUGE. So we must not be afraid that such an intermediary structure – Institution/Centre/Service - would not have enough work to do, on the contrary.
It is extremely unfair to send everything for recycling, which costs money, or to waste disposal, which is a cause of pollution, when in every country there are so many needy people who can actually use that same stuff. In our posts from today on, you will read our ideas about how redistribution should be organised at national level, and the reasons why we believe so much in it (‘mitigating the consequences of overconsumption’ is only one of them). Our ‘About’ section already contains some information.
How can you help? Spread around the ideas that you find on this page. Mention us if you want, do not mention us if you don’t want. All we care about is that people become aware of this solution (mind you, not this ‘problem’, but this ‘solution’ – most pages present a problem, we present a solution!) and that it is implemented in our countries and in our cities! Are you a politician? Do you know a politician? Are you a member of a political party? Do you know somebody who is a member of a political party? Please take over the idea and help us put it into practice. Contact us and we will provide you syntheses/reports/notes about our vision, that you can use further in your political projects. Speak to other persons about our page, share our page, like and comment on our posts.
This is big. It’s about our planet as well as about our fellow citizens. Let us fight pollution at the same time as poverty. Help us reach the world.

Address

New York, NY

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Redistribution is better than recycling posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Helping the needy has never been more ecological

This page is the expression of a deep and firm conviction that the redistribution of physical items on Earth must become a generalised mechanism in our societies and an ordinary part of our everyday life, above and beyond recycling and waste disposal. In these times of ecological emergency, the issue of redistribution (a practice which has always existed in past societies) must gain public attention and, more importantly, public funding.

What are household items? They are everything we ever use in our houses and gardens: clothes, shoes, electric and electronic equipment, baby items, furniture, books, toys, decorative objects, kitchenware etc. etc. etc. The list can actually be never-ending. Or if you want: everything polluting our life.

What is redistribution? Basically it means receiving a still-good-to-use household item from a donor and transferring it to another person/family who needs it on that moment (a beneficiary). This exchange should be managed by a publicly funded institution set up for this very purpose. Also, this exchange should be governed by rules established at political level (for example: the criteria based on which a person can be registered as a beneficiary).

Why redistribution? Follow our page :) We have HUNDREDS of reasons and we will post roughly one reason per day. Then we will go in detail!!