06/04/2026
New York City has a de facto multiparty system. Despite recent reforms like ranked-choice voting, its electoral rules channel political competition into lower turnout and intra-party factional fights, rather than contests between multiple distinct parties in the general election. Proportional representation (PR) offers a way to fix this problem.
In a new report for the Manhattan Institute, electoral system expert Jack Santucci and director of Cities John Ketchum examine how PR could reshape New York City's City Council elections. They find that the current single-seat district system produces two problems: right-leaning voters, being geographically dispersed, win far fewer seats than their vote share warrants (roughly 10% of seats on 22% of votes), while low-turnout Democratic primaries give organized factions like the Working Families Party outsized influence over who gets elected.
The report simulates two PR alternatives using 2025 council election data. Open-list PR (OLPR) would use the five boroughs as multi-seat districts, while mixed-member proportional (MMP) would retain current districts and add 20 citywide seats to correct imbalances. Both systems would bring seat shares closer to vote shares without dramatically changing who wins.
Read the full report: https://bit.ly/4avCzIS
On May 28, Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced the creation of a Charter Revision Commission (CRC), called the Commission on Government Efficiency, with a mandate to make government work better.[1] The CRC has an opportunity to address the democratic deficit produced by the city’s current electoral rul...