Uranium Watch (UW)

Uranium Watch (UW) Uranium Watch (UW) was established in 2006, to address the health, safety, environmental, and regula

Another study showing that we could relatively easily get almost all our power from renewables in the next 40 yearshttp:...
04/22/2013

Another study showing that we could relatively easily get almost all our power from renewables in the next 40 years
http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/041713release.cfm

Scenario for 2050 With Total End of Coal, Reduced Nuclear and Natural Gas Seen as Realistic; Lights Would Stay On Even "When the Wind Doesn't Blow ... And the Sun Doesn't Shine".

04/08/2013
Overwhelming majorities of Americans want more emphasis on solar and wind, while coal, nuclear and oil are the least-pop...
04/08/2013

Overwhelming majorities of Americans want more emphasis on solar and wind, while coal, nuclear and oil are the least-popular energy sources. More than 7-in-10 Americans want the U.S. to put more emphasis on producing domestic energy using solar power (76%) and wind power (71%), finds Gallup. Natural gas is slightly less popular, but a majority still wants the U.S. to put more emphasis on it (65%). Less than half of Americans want to emphasize oil (46%), nuclear (37%) or coal (31%). In fact, Americans want to put less emphasis on coal by a 10-point margin (31% want more emphasis; 41% want less).

This is an insightful perspective into the uranium speculation game from an industry flack.  Just a few tweaks and it wo...
03/14/2013

This is an insightful perspective into the uranium speculation game from an industry flack. Just a few tweaks and it would read like satire.

Uranium One left a lot of fingerprints in our neighborhood.


Obituary of a Public Company vs the Birth Announcement of a Private Company: Uranium One
Posted on March 11, 2013 by Canon Bryan

Uranium One is a company that has had a number of twists and turns in its 10-year arc as a public company – from near-bankrupt gold exploration company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, to $8 billion market darling on the Toronto Stock Exchange, to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Russian government. On March 6, the shareholders agreed to be privatized by Atomredmetzoloto, the Russian state uranium mining company.

The story begins in early 2003 when New Kleinfontein Mining Company Limited, led by South African mining engineer Neal Froneman, was acquired by Afrikander Lease, or Aflease, in a reverse merger, and was listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The small company had a tiny gold mining operation, had little cash left, but had the Dominion Reefs, which had been mined for over a century for gold, but was also known to contain a vast reserve of uranium. No one much cared for uranium at that time, and Mr. Froneman rolled the dice on promoting Dominion Reefs as a new uranium mine. With the gold operations closing down, he racked his credit cards to do one last international roadshow, hoping that he could drum up investment for uranium. The gamble paid off, he raised money, and the company was on its way. That’s how it started.

Canadian junior Southern Cross Resources listed in 1997, having acquired the dormant Honeymoon uranium processing plant in 1997. The plan was to refurbish and expand the operation, and mine the 15-million-pound Goulds Dam deposit. Commercial production of 250,000 pounds per year was projected to begin in 1998, but only started in 2011. Aflease was on the hunt for more uranium assets, while also looking for exposure to a wider investor base. In July 2005, Aflease and Southern Cross announced their merger, with the new company getting the quirky moniker “sxr Uranium One,” and Neal Froneman taking the helm. The acquisition spree was underway, and accelerated wildly over the next two years.

In Vancouver, Canada, billionaire financier Frank Giustra was planning to stake his claim in the increasingly popular uranium game. He found out that Kazakhstan had a huge reserve of uranium, and decided to get it. With ex-President Bill Clinton negotiating on his behalf, Giustra grabbed stakes in huge Kazakh state-owned deposits, and put them into his new company, UrAsia Energy. In exchange, Giustra “contributed” $30 million to the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation, and later another $100 million. UrAsia listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange in September 2005, with a $300 million financing. Only 16 months later, UrAsia and sxr Uranium One were merged in a blockbuster deal.

In the summer of 2004 in America, a team of geologists who anticipated that the uranium boom was coming started acquiring a massive number of uranium properties all over the western states of Wyoming, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, South Dakota, Arizona and Oregon. The company changed its name to Energy Metals Corp, and was led by geologists Paul Matysek and Bill Sheriff. Their acquisition spree was prolific. In less than three years, the company amassed a portfolio with dozens of properties in seven states, and over 250 million pounds of estimated uranium resources. This package proved too tempting for SXR’s insatiable appetite for growth. After having their deal to purchase Rio Tinto’s US uranium portfolio unceremoniously cancelled, SXR went after Energy Metals Corp in June 2007 for $1.9 billion (Canadian dollars). The company changed its name to Uranium One.

In whirlwind four years, Aflease had gone from an obscure gold exploration company to one of the ten largest uranium mining companies in the world. After the summer of 2007, the acquisition spree slowed right down, and the uranium price, which had skyrocketed from less than $20 per pound in 2004 to over $135 in 2007, was correcting swiftly. Problems began to emerge in this huge collection of uranium assets. Perhaps most problematic was the operating trouble at Dominion Reefs in South Africa. Delays and cost overruns hurt the company’s image. Uranium One’s stock price suffered badly, falling from over $18 per share in May to below $9 per share before the end of 2007, and Neal Froneman was the scapegoat. (The price went as low as $0.60 per share in 2008.) The original gold assets were spun off into a new company called Gold One, and Mr. Froneman went back to South Africa to run his gold company. Dominion Reefs was eventually sold off to a private Indian company for $30 million, after hundreds of millions in writedowns.

Since that time, the Russian government has taken an increasing interest in Uranium One, acquiring a 17% stake in June 2009, another 3% later that year, and increasing its stake to 51% in June 2010, while contributing its ownership in more Kazakh uranium mines into Uranium One. The following year, the Russian government helped Uranium One get the large Mkuju River deposit, located in the Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania, for over $1 billion. Even better, the Russians managed to get the UN to change the boundary of the World Heritage Site so that uranium could be mined there. Last week, the Russians finally claimed the complete prize by privatizing the entire company at a valuation of $2.9 billion. ARMZ’s long range strategy is to mine uranium outside of Russia so that it can supply customers of its reactor export program. The uranium for Russia’s own domestic reactors will be mined within Russia. This transaction also, incidentally, makes the Russian government the owner of the majority of US uranium production.

After a 10-year roller coaster ride, riddled with spectacular mergers, hundreds of millions in financing, international political scandals, Uranium One ended up being the fourth largest uranium mining company in the world, and ultimately did achieve its original objective. Uranium One will be missed.

Center for American Progress has posted a powerful and refreshing recreation/economy-based analysis of the craziness flo...
03/14/2013

Center for American Progress has posted a powerful and refreshing recreation/economy-based analysis of the craziness flowing from the tired, but recurring efforts of the extractive-industry-funded efforts to give National Forests, National Parks and other public lands to the states. It provides an effective summary and further data to support the economic benefits of protection and reclamation of mine-ravaged public lands.

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/report/2013/03/11/56103/state-efforts-to-reclaim-our-public-lands/

"We are now seeing yet another iteration of that hardy but misguided western impulse. These state legislative efforts are nothing more than corporate-backed messaging tools that can be traced to conservative front groups such as the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, and Americans for Prosperity, as we discuss further below. The proposals run directly contrary to abundant evidence that Americans and westerners support federal management of their public lands and value the economic benefits those lands provide, especially when they are protected from mining and drilling and are used instead for recreation and other more sustainable purposes."

*******

"Public lands provide tremendous economic impacts. The Department of the Interior—the agency that manages most public lands—stimulated $385 billion in economic development and more than 2 million jobs in 2011 alone. This number includes the extraction of oil, gas, coal, and other minerals from public lands, in addition to timber, grazing, and recreation. Recreation-related activities alone created 403,000 jobs and nearly $49 billion in economic activity across the country. The U.S. Forest Service, which manages national forests, also has major economic impacts—visitor spending on recreation in and near national forests, for example, added $13 billion to gross domestic product and sustained 200,000 jobs across the country in fiscal year 2011.

"The fact that public lands create jobs is echoed in public sentiment. In six western states, for example, 79 percent of voters believe that public lands support the economy, while only 15 percent believe they “take land off the tax rolls, cost government to maintain them, and prevent opportunities for logging and oil and gas production that could provide jobs.”"

03/11/2013

Nice job HEAL Utah! Big hit against the proposed nuclear plant in Green River!

The entrepreneurs behind the proposed Green River nuclear reactors have long faced a massive hurdle: Finding someone to buy their expensive electricity.

Utility executives across America are turning their back on nuclear power for one simple reason: It costs too dang much. It’s just as true here in the West, where former Rep. Aaron Tilton and Blue Castle Holdings have found little interest.

It’s left them increasingly desperate, as they keep shoving back deadlines for submitting permit approvals. The company is clearly running out of cash and time.

And so, Tilton apparently decided to see if his former colleagues at the Legislature would lend his flailing nuclear project a hand. He put together a bill to benefit Blue Castle. A bill to change state law so that utilities wouldn’t have to bear the considerable risk of building new nuclear. He quietly pitched it as “minor” reforms “leveling the playing field” for his project. To avoid too much controversy, the bill didn't use the word “nuclear,” instead calling their Green River bid the warm-and-fuzzy sounding “zero carbon emissions generation.”

They found a powerful legislator to introduce the bill. They slapped an innocuous sounding name “Energy Revisions” on the bill and hoped they could slide it by – without anyone noticing that SB199 would force utility customers in Utah to pay every penny to develop nuclear reactors here.

That’s apparently what Tilton and Blue Castle thought. Apparently they didn’t count on two things: Us. And You.

They didn’t count on HEAL Utah having sniffed out this absurd scheme months ago, as Blue Castle began bumbling around town floating its dumb idea. They didn’t count on the fact that HEAL had spent weeks warning everyone from advocates for seniors to utility regulators to big industrial users to reporters about the radical scheme Tilton was pitching, slowly building a diverse and well-informed base of opposition.

They didn’t count on You. On the fact that Utahns like you are so outraged by the Green River nuclear proposal – and by Blue Castle’s lame bid to force us to pay for it – that you responded eagerly and quickly to our call for actions, generating hundreds of personalized emails and phone calls from constituents to key Legislators.

Frankly, it wasn’t much of a fight. Blue Castle Holdings might have the political connections and the campaign contributions, but they don’t have the savvy. Or the s***k. Or the grassroots army.

And so, SB199 died swiftly and ignominiously! It didn’t even get a hearing, as its sponsor, Sen. Curt Bramble, took the extraordinary measure of rising on the Senate floor to publicly withdraw the bill. He even chose to blast Tilton – accusing him of lying about the bill.

It was a welcome and BIG victory: Thank you! Thanks for your support of HEAL and your willingness to respond when we call you to act. Thanks for helping to drive a critical stake in the heart of this project.

We have two weeks left in the legislative session, and key measures remain, including several bills that could help clean our dirty air. Stay tuned! You'll hear from us soon about how you can help.

Show Your Green River Nukes Opposition!
It’s time for Blue Castle Holdings to admit what everyone knows: This Green River scheme is not going to succeed. No matter how desperately they try to force it down our throats, we’re not buying.

And, now, HEAL is proud to offer you an opportunity to display your opposition to the Green River boondoggle: A lawn sign! Inspired by the success of our colleagues at Save Our Canyons – whose red “Stop Ski Link” signs dot the Wasatch Front – we have printed hundreds of canary yellow Green River: Say No! signs.

Aren’t they snazzy? Bright and powerful? Don’t you need one? You can have one sign for $3 – or two signs for $5! (A suggested donation to help cover our costs.)

Come to our office at 824 South 400 West Suite B111 (map) anytime weekdays between 9:30 am and 5:30 pm to pick up a sign now! Just in case, call the office at 801-355-5055 to make sure we’re here.

Address

Moab, UT
84532

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Uranium Watch (UW) posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share