04/02/2022
Local Arizona resident submits replacement names for AZ mountains to Department of the Interior
From the list of 664 names provided by United States Geological Survey (USGS) throughout the United States, Arizona is third after the states California and Idaho for having the highest number of geographic features containing the derogatory term “Sq__” within their name. In Arizona, there are 67 geological features (streams, reservoirs, springs, valleys, summits and even a beach) containing the derogatory term. Nineteen of the 67 are summits in Arizona.
The deadline set by The Department of the Interior (DOI) is approaching. Last day to submit public comment on candidate names to replace derogatory names of geographic features on federal lands throughout the United States ends on April 25, 2022. (https://federalregister.gov/d/2022-03748 )
In reviewing the suggested names from the Task Force appointed by Interior Secretary Deb Haaland. Jennifer Touchine with Hózhó Life, Inc with other interested parties found some of the proposed candidate names are as potentially inappropriate or derogatory as the names they intended to replace.
Hózhó Life, Inc would like to announce and show support to longtime Arizona resident, Scott Surgent, for the suggested replacement names submitted to the Task Force for the Arizona summits. Mr. Surgent has acquired significant local knowledge of the land as an avid hiker, climber and amateur historian. Surgent has documented many Arizona summits through reviews captured on the website https://listsofjohn.com/.
All name suggestions for the 19 Arizona summits were formally submitted to the DOI’s Task Force through federal register by Mr. Surgent. It is important to remove the derogatory term, Sq__ from the landscape of the United States. It is a commendable endeavor that the Interior Secretary will accomplish this in less than a year. However, the manner in which this task is being achieve lacks the detail required to sensibly rename these geological features.
Scott states, “a peak’s new name should have some basis in history, or follow a local theme, or take into account local sentiment. It is a given there will be people upset at renaming any peak, thus, it is important to have a balance in how the peaks are renamed. I believe if the peak lies on land belonging to or has historical/religious significance to a Native American Nation, their suggestions should be primary. Otherwise, the names can be chosen based on a mixture of criteria.”