09/08/2026
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics in infant formula, meat, eggs, water, soil, and honey – the silent circulation of a drug
Fluoroquinolones are modern, broad-spectrum antibiotics used on a massive scale in human and veterinary medicine. They save lives in acute infections, but they are also among the drugs most frequently associated with long-lasting adverse effects, including tendon damage, neuropathy, dysautonomia, and probable mitochondrial injury. For people who have already been harmed by fluoroquinolones, even tiny “background” exposures become a worrying question: are traces of these drugs still circulating in our food and environment, and if so, what could that mean for sensitive individuals?
Over the past 15–20 years, analytical chemistry has provided an uncomfortable answer. Thanks to sensitive methods such as solid-phase extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, and LC–MS/MS, researchers have shown that fluoroquinolone residues can be found in almost every part of the food chain: in infant and young-child milk powders, meat, eggs, fish, honey, drinking and aquaculture water, and even in agricultural soils and vegetables irrigated with contaminated water. These concentrations are usually low and, under current regulations, are considered safe for the general population. But they are not zero, and they are biologically active molecules designed to interact with DNA and mitochondria.
❓In the context of fluoroquinolone-associated disability (FQAD) and mitochondrial dysfunction, this raises a simple but profound question: what is the effect of chronic micro-dosing through food, water and environmental exposure in people whose detoxification and repair systems are already weakened❓
🧿 Fluoroquinolones in infant formula and baby foods
Infant formula and baby foods are some of the most strictly regulated products on the market. In the European Union, veterinary antimicrobials are not permitted in baby foods, so a “zero-tolerance” policy applies. In practice, this means that any detectable residue is considered illegal, even if the absolute amount is minimal.
Despite this, several independent groups – mainly in Spain and other European countries – have developed methods that detect fluoroquinolone residues in commercial baby foods and powdered infant formula. Rodríguez and co-workers validated a solid-phase extraction and LC–LC-fluorescence method for powdered infant formula from the Spanish and Latin-American market and showed that traces of fluoroquinolones can be measured at levels of a few μg/kg. Other work by the same team used pressurized liquid extraction combined with LC–FLD to analyse infant food products containing meat, chicken, and fish. In that study, a chicken-based baby food sample was found to be non-compliant because of enrofloxacin residues, confirmed by LC–MS/MS.
A further step was taken by Herrera-Herrera and colleagues, who applied SPE and UPLC–MS/MS to infant and young-child powdered milks and could simultaneously quantify multiple quinolones and fluoroquinolones (including levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and moxifloxacin) at very low concentrations. These methods show that, technically, it is possible to detect and quantify fluoroquinolone residues in infant milks at low μg/kg levels, and that some marketed products do contain measurable residues, even where legislation assumes they should be absent.
Why do infant products contain any fluoroquinolones at all? The main explanation is upstream: dairy cows treated with veterinary fluoroquinolones may continue to excrete residues in milk if withdrawal times are not respected or if extra-label use occurs. Residues can also enter the milk supply through contaminated water, feed, and biofilms in pipelines. Reviews on veterinary drug residues in the food chain emphasise that inappropriate dosing, failure to observe withdrawal periods, and the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters have all contributed to a background level of antibiotic residues in milk and dairy products worldwide.
For healthy infants, regulators assume that the combination of low concentrations, short exposure, and safety factors keeps the risk minimal. But for families in which the mother has a history of fluoroquinolone toxicity or mitochondrial dysfunction, the idea that formula or baby foods may contain small amounts of the same class of drug is understandably alarming – especially in the context of clinical stories where children show joint noises, ligament problems or developmental symptoms despite never receiving the drug directly.
🧿 Meat, eggs, and fish – residues surviving cooking and freezing
Fluoroquinolones are widely used in poultry, pigs, cattle and aquaculture. Their residues are regularly detected in raw meat and edible tissues. Studies from Europe, Asia and Africa have reported ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, norfloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in chicken muscles, liver, and gizzards, sometimes above the maximum residue limits (MRLs) and sometimes below but still measurable.
Eggs are not exempt. A method using pressurized liquid extraction and LC–FLD was developed for enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and sarafloxacin in table eggs, demonstrating that residues can be reliably extracted from yolk and albumen and quantified at low μg/kg levels. This does not mean that every egg contains antibiotic residues, but it does confirm that fluoroquinolones can reach eggs when laying hens are treated improperly.
The next logical question is whether standard kitchen processing destroys these residues. For many antibiotics, heating and boiling do significantly reduce the concentration. For fluoroquinolones, the picture is more complicated. In a classic study, Lolo and colleagues examined naturally occurring enrofloxacin residues in chicken meat and tested boiling, microwaving, roasting, grilling, and frying. They found that enrofloxacin (and its active metabolite ciprofloxacin) were remarkably heat-stable: in some cooking modes the absolute concentration in the meat decreased modestly, but in others it even appeared to increase because water was lost. The residue became more concentrated in the remaining tissue.
Other experimental work confirms that boiling, microwaving and roasting usually lead to only partial reduction of fluoroquinolone residues, and part of the lost fraction simply migrates into the cooking water or juices, rather than being destroyed. From the point of view of a sensitive consumer, this means that grilled or roasted meat from recently treated animals can still contain biologically relevant amounts of fluoroquinolones after cooking and freezing. Long-term freezing does not reliably remove these residues; it mainly slows down microbial growth and enzymatic reactions, while the antibiotic molecule remains largely intact.
🧿 Honey and bees – fluoroquinolones in a “natural” product
Honey is often perceived as a clean, almost medicinal product. However, in modern beekeeping, it can be contaminated with antibiotics used to control bacterial infections in hives. Fluoroquinolones, including banned substances like norfloxacin, have been detected in honey samples from several countries.
Kanda and co-workers developed a microbiological screening test combined with liquid chromatography to rapidly determine seven fluoroquinolones (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, orbifloxacin, sarafloxacin, and difloxacin) in honey. More recently, a five-year study in Zhejiang Province, China, analysed 681 honey samples from Apis mellifera and Apis cerana and found that four fluoroquinolones were detected in about 7% of samples. Norfloxacin – a drug banned in bee products – showed the highest detection frequency and reached concentrations as high as 7,890 μg/kg in some r**e honey samples.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotics in honey confirms that, globally, residues of various antimicrobial classes (including fluoroquinolones) are frequently found, with substantial variability between countries and production systems. Importantly, there are also many honey samples where no antibiotics are detected, especially from producers who do not use veterinary drugs in beekeeping. But from the perspective of someone with FQAD, the presence of even a small fraction of contaminated honey on the market is enough to justify caution and, where possible, choosing producers who provide independent residue testing.
🧿 Water, aquaculture and the aquatic environment
Fluoroquinolones are mainly excreted unchanged in urine and faeces, and they bind strongly to sediments and organic matter. Wastewater treatment plants only partially remove them. As a result, they have been detected in surface waters (rivers and lakes), aquaculture ponds, and even some drinking-water sources in various parts of the world.
A**lytical methods using molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction and LC–MS/MS have shown that ultratrace concentrations (ng/L) of multiple fluoroquinolones can be present in drinking water and fish-farm water. In hotspots downstream of pharmaceutical manufacturing or large hospitals, levels can be orders of magnitude higher, creating a powerful selection pressure for resistant bacteria and a chronic low-dose exposure to humans and animals.
Fish raised in contaminated water can accumulate fluoroquinolones in their tissues, especially in organs like the liver and kidney, but also in edible muscle. Reviews of veterinary drug residues in aquaculture products consistently list ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and related drugs as major contaminants of concern.
🧿 Soil, manure, and vegetables – antibiotics in the field
What is excreted by animals or discharged with effluents does not disappear. It ends up in manure, sludge, and agricultural soils. Several studies have documented fluoroquinolone residues in soils irrigated with wastewater or fertilized with contaminated manure, often at levels of tens to hundreds of μg/kg.
In an intensive vegetable-growing area in northern China, fluoroquinolone residues in soil were linked to planting patterns and to the use of contaminated irrigation water. Research from the Yamuna River region in India showed that spinach and other leafy vegetables irrigated with pharmaceutical-contaminated water accumulated antibiotics, with ofloxacin reaching measurable concentrations in edible leaves. This confirms that antibiotics can move from water to soil and then into plant tissues, entering the human diet even in products that do not contain veterinary drugs.
From a regulatory standpoint, these levels are still low and there are currently no specific maximum residue limits for fluoroquinolones in vegetables. From a mechanistic standpoint, they are another piece of the puzzle: a small but chronic dose of DNA-active, mitochondria-targeting molecules in the daily diet.
❓❓What does this mean for people with FQAD and mitochondrial dysfunction?
For the average consumer, risk assessments compare estimated daily exposure from food and water with an acceptable daily intake (ADI) derived from animal toxicology, multiplied by safety factors. Under this framework, most measured fluoroquinolone residues in food fall below the thresholds considered risky.
However, people with profound fluoroquinolone-associated injury do not fit the “average consumer” model. Many report hypersensitivity to tiny exposures, including eye or ear drops, traces in food, or dust from pharmacy pills. Mechanistically, this is not implausible. Fluoroquinolones are known to:
➤➤ Inhibit bacterial and mitochondrial topoisomerases and interfere with DNA replication and repair.
➤➤ Generate oxidative stress and damage mitochondrial membranes.
➤➤ Chelate magnesium and other cations essential for energy metabolism.
If mitochondria are already damaged and antioxidant reserves are exhausted, even minor additional hits may prolong inflammation, delay regeneration, and maintain a state of “cellular alarm”. For these patients, chronic, low-dose exposure through food and water could, in theory, act as a constant background stressor – something like a weak but persistent flame under a pot that never quite cools down.
At the same time, it is essential to be honest about the scientific evidence. We have solid data showing the presence of fluoroquinolone residues in infant formula, baby foods, meat, eggs, honey, water, soil and vegetables. What we do not yet have are large, controlled studies directly linking these background residues to clinical relapses or progression of FQAD. That research still needs to be done.
❓❓What, then, can a cautious but realistic approach look like?
1. Awareness. Knowing that fluoroquinolone residues can be present in animal-derived foods, honey, and some plant products helps patients and clinicians make informed choices. People with severe FQ-related problems may reasonably decide to reduce or eliminate the share of industrial meat, intensively farmed fish, and non-tested honey in their diet, especially when alternatives are available.
2. Support for better monitoring. The analytical methods already exist; what is often missing is routine, transparent surveillance with public reporting. Testing programs for infant formula, baby foods, meat, eggs, honey, and water should systematically include fluoroquinolones, not sporadically, and should publish their detection limits and results.
3. Recognition of vulnerable groups. Regulatory toxicology tends to focus on the “healthy adult” and, at most, on children and pregnant women. People with mitochondrial diseases, prior fluoroquinolone toxicity, or other conditions affecting DNA repair and detoxification are usually not considered. As evidence accumulates, it may be necessary to redefine what “safe” means for these populations.
✅......... Finally, this topic should not be used to create panic or helplessness, but to motivate better science and more honest regulation. The fact that fluoroquinolones can be traced from veterinary use to milk, meat, baby foods, honey, water, soil, and vegetables is not a conspiracy theory; it is a documented reality of modern agriculture and pharmacology. The open question – crucial for millions of patients – is how these chronic micro-exposures interact with existing mitochondrial and DNA damage, and whether reducing them can improve long-term outcomes. Until we have clear answers, prudence, transparency, and independent research are the most reasonable path forward - choose your food carefully.
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
💊Medications in the fluoroquinolone class (incl: Cipro/ciprofloxacin, Levaquin (off market)/levofloxacin, Avelox/moxifloxacin etc) in all forms for humans and pets: https://fq100.org/drug-list
Find support and resources on our sites:
🌐 Find Us: https://fq100.org/
▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/
🔵 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/fqtoxicitystudy/
🐦 X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/FQ_100
⚠️Disclaimer
This text is intended for information and education only. It does not replace individual medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Decisions about diet, treatment and monitoring of fluoroquinolone-associated problems should always be taken into consultation with qualified healthcare professionals who know the patient’s full clinical situation.
References:
1. Rodríguez E, Moreno-Bondi MC, Marazuela MD. Development and validation of a solid-phase extraction method coupled to liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection for the determination of fluoroquinolone residues in powdered infant formulae. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1209(1–2):136–144.
2. Rodríguez E, Moreno-Bondi MC, Marazuela MD. Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials in baby foods by liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 2011;127(3):1354–1360.
3. Rodríguez E, Navarro-Villoslada F, Moreno-Bondi MC, Marazuela MD. Optimization of a pressurized liquid extraction method by experimental design methodologies for the determination of fluoroquinolone residues in infant foods by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217(5):605–613.
4. Herrera-Herrera AV, Hernández-Borges J, Rodríguez-Delgado MA, Cifuentes A. Determination of quinolone residues in infant and young children powdered milk combining solid-phase extraction and UPLC–MS/MS. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(42):8423–8431.
5. Foo WY, Loh SH, Wan Mohd Afiq WMK, Ariffin MM. Fluoroquinolone residues in food: occurrence and analytical methods – a mini review from 2000 to 2022. Malays J A**l Sci. 2023;27(3):533–551.
6. Khalifa HO, Shikoray L, Mohamed M-YI, Habib I, Matsumoto T. Veterinary drug residues in the food chain as an emerging public health threat: sources, analytical methods, health impacts, and preventive measures. Foods. 2024;13(11):1629.
7. Gentili A, Perret D, Marchese S, Curini R. Accelerated solvent extraction and confirmatory analysis of sulfonamide residues in raw meat and infant foods by LC–MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(1):154–160.
8. Herranz S, Moreno-Bondi MC, Marazuela MD. Development of a new sample pretreatment procedure based on pressurized liquid extraction for the determination of fluoroquinolone residues in table eggs. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1140(1–2):63–70.
9. Lolo M, Pedreira S, Miranda JM, et al. Effect of cooking on enrofloxacin residues in chicken tissue. Food Addit Contam. 2006;23(10):988–993.
10. Javadi A, Mirzaie H, Khatibi SA. Effect of roasting, boiling and microwaving cooking methods on enrofloxacin residues in edible tissues of broiler. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;5(2):214–218.
11. Kamouh HM, Abdallah R, Kirrella GA, Mostafa NY, Shafik S. Assessment of antibiotic residues in chicken meat. Open Vet J. 2024;14(1):438–448.
12. Kanda M, Kusano T, Kanai S, et al. Rapid determination of fluoroquinolone residues in honey by a microbiological screening method and liquid chromatography. J AOAC Int. 2010;93(4):1331–1339.
13. He L, Shen L, Zhang J, Li R. Comprehensive investigation of fluoroquinolone residues in Apis mellifera and Apis cerana honey and potential risks to consumers: a five-year study (2014–2018) in Zhejiang Province, China. Toxics. 2023;11(9):744.
14. Shoaei M, Foroughi M, Badrzadeh M, et al. Antibiotics in honey: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Health Res. 2024;34(2):1064–1075.
15. Akhter S, Bhat MA, Hashem A, et al. Profiling of antibiotic residues in soil and vegetables irrigated using pharmaceutical-contaminated water in the Delhi stretch of the Yamuna River, India. Water. 2023;15(23):4197.
16. Li X, Xie Y, Wang J, et al. Influence of planting patterns on fluoroquinolone residues in the soil of an intensive vegetable cultivation area in northern China. Sci Total Environ. 2013;458–460:63–69.
17. Rodríguez E, Navarro-Villoslada F, Benito-Peña E, Marazuela MD, Moreno-Bondi MC. Multiresidue determination of ultratrace levels of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials in drinking and aquaculture water samples by automated online molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography. A**l Chem. 2011;83(6):2046–2055.
18. Gothwal R, Shashidhar T. Occurrence of high levels of fluoroquinolones in aquatic environment due to effluent discharges from bulk drug manufacturers. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. 2017;21(3):04016013.
19. Ghimpeţeanu OM, Pogurschi EN, Popa DC, Dragomir N, Dragotoiu T, Mihai OD, Petcu CD. Antibiotic use in livestock and residues in food – a public health threat: a review. Antibiotics. 2022;11(5):676.
