Logan Masonic Temple

Logan Masonic Temple Freemasonry is the Worlds Oldest and Largest Fraternity! Mingo Lodge was chartered by The Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons in the State of Ohio.

We are a Community Organization dedicated to the Brotherhood of Man, the Fatherhood of God, and the Immortality of the Soul!

09/16/2020

Today in Masonic History: James Cash "J.C." Penney, Jr. is born in 1875. A member of Wasatch Lodge No. 1 in Salt Lake City, Utah, Penney was an American businessman and entrepeneur, most famous for founding the popular department store J.C. Penney. In 1940, while visiting one of his stores in Des Moines, Iowa, he taught a young Sam Walton (Walmart & Sam's Club) how to wrap packages with limited paper and ribbon. He also was integral in founding the University of Miami, and started the Penney Family Fund charity. []

06/23/2020

by Christopher Hodapp On Saturday morning, the fallen bronze carcass of Albert Pike's once noble statue in Washington, DC's Judiciary ...

THE EYE IN THE PYRAMIDS. Brent Morris, P.M.Historians must be cautious about many well-known “facts.” George Washington ...
05/28/2020

THE EYE IN THE PYRAMID

S. Brent Morris, P.M.

Historians must be cautious about many well-known “facts.” George Washington chopped down a cherry tree when a boy and confessed the deed to his father. Abner Doubleday invented the game of baseball. Freemasons inserted some of their emblems (chief among them the eye in the pyramid) into the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States. These historical “facts” are widely popular, commonly accepted, and equally false.

The eye in the pyramid (emblazoned on the dollar bill, no less - see image) is often cited as “evidence” that sinister conspiracies abound which will impose a “New World Order” on an unsuspecting populace. Depending on whom you hear it from, the Masons are planning the takeover themselves, or are working in concert with European bankers, or are leading (or perhaps being led by) the Illuminati (whoever they are). The notion of a world-wide Masonic conspiracy would be laughable, if it weren’t being repeated with such earnest gullibility by conspiracists like Pat Robertson.

Sadly, Masons are sometimes counted among the gullible who repeat the tall tale of the eye in the pyramid, often with a touch of pride. They may be guilty of nothing worse than innocently puffing the importance of their fraternity (as well as themselves), but they’re guilty nonetheless. The time has come state the truth plainly and simply.

The Great Seal of the United States is not a Masonic emblem, nor does it contain hidden Masonic symbols.

The details are there for anyone to check, who’s willing to rely on historical fact rather than hysterical fiction.

• Benjamin Franklin was the only Mason on the first design committee, and his suggestions had no Masonic content.

• None of the final designers of the seal were Masons.

• The interpretation of the eye on the seal is subtly different from the interpretation used by Masons.

• The eye in the pyramid is not nor has been a Masonic symbol.

THE FIRST COMMITTEE

On Independence Day, 1776 a committee was created to design a seal for the new American nation. The committee’s members were Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams, with Pierre Du Simitière as artist and consultant. (1) Of the four men involved, only Benjamin Franklin was a Mason, and he contributed nothing of a Masonic nature to the committee’s proposed design for a seal.

Du Simitière, the committee’s consultant and a non-Mason, contributed several major design features that made their way into the ultimate design of the seal: “the shield, E Pluribus Unum, MDCCLXXVI, and the eye of providence in a triangle.” (2) The eye of providence on the seal thus can be traced not to the Masons, but to a non-Mason consultant to the committee.

“The single eye was a well-established artistic convention for an ‘omniscient Ubiquitous Deity’ in the medallic art of the Renaisance. Du Simitière, who suggested using the symbol, collected art books and was familiar with the artistic and ornamental devices used in Renaissance art.” (3) This was the same cultural iconography that eventually led Masons to add the all-seeing eye to their symbols.

THE SECOND AND THIRD COMMITTEES

Congress declined the first committee’s suggestions as well as those of its 1780 commitee. Francis Hopkinson, consultant to the second committee, had several lasting ideas that eventually made it into the seal: “white and red stripes within a blue background for the shield, a radiant constellation of thirteen stars, and an olive branch.” (4) Hopkinson’s greatest contribution to the current seal came from his layout of a 1778 50-dollar colonial note in which he used an unfinished pyramid in the design.

The third and last seal committee of 1782 produced a design that finally satisfied Congress. Charles Thomson, Secretary of Congress, and William Barton, artist and consultant, borrowed from earlier designs and sketched what at length became the United States seal.

The misinterpretation of the seal as a Masonic emblem may have been first introduced a century later in 1884. Harvard Professor Eliot Norton wrote that the reverse was “practically incapable of effective treatment; it can hardly, (however artistically treated by the designer,) look otherwise than as a dull emblem of a Masonic fraternity.” (5)

INTERPRETING THE SYMBOL

The “Remarks and Explanations” of Thomson and Barton are the only explanation of the symbols’ meaning. Despite what anti-Masons may believe, there’s no reason to doubt the interpretation accepted by the Congress. “The Pyramid signified Strength and Duration: The Eye over it & the Motto allude to the many signal interpositions of providence in favor of the American cause.” (6)

The committees and consultants who designed the Great Seal of the United States contained only one Mason, Benjamin Franklin. The only possibly Masonic design element among the very many on the seal is the eye of providence, and the interpretation of it by the designers is different from that used by Masons. The eye on the seal represents an active intervention of God in the affairs of men, while the Masonic symbol stands for a passive awareness by God of the activities of men.

The first “official” use and definition of the all-seeing eye as a Masonic symbol seems to have come in 1797 with The Freemason’s Monitor of Thomas Smith Webb—14 years after Congress adopted the design for the seal. Here’s how Webb explains the symbol.

[A]nd although our thoughts, words and actions, may be hidden from the eyes of man, yet that All-Seeing Eye, whom the Sun, Moon and Stars obey, and under whose watchful care even comets perform their stupendous revolutions, pervades the inmost recesses of the human heart, and will reward us according to our merits.” (7)

THE EYE IN THE PYRAMID

Besides the subtly different interpretations of the symbol, it is notable that Webb did not describe the eye as being in a triangle. Jeremy Ladd Cross published The True Masonic Chart or Hieroglyphic Monitor in 1819, essentially an illustrated version of Webb’s Monitor. In this first “official” depiction of Webb’s symbol, Cross had illustrator Amos Doolittle depict the eye surrounded by a semi-circular glory. (8)

The all-seeing eye thus appears to be a rather recent addition to Masonic symbolism. It is not found in any of the gothic constitutions, written from about 1390 to 1730. The eye—sometimes in a triangle, sometimes in clouds, but nearly always surrounded by a glory—was a popular Masonic decorative device in the latter half of the 18th century. Its use as a design element seems to have been an artistic representation of the omniscience of God, rather than some generally accepted Masonic symbol.

Its meaning in all cases, however, was that commonly given it by society at large—a reminder of the constant presence of God. For example, in 1614 the frontispiece of The History of the World by Walter Raleigh showed an eye in a cloud labeled “Providentia” overlooking a globe. It has not been suggested that Raleigh’s History is a Masonic document, despite the use of the all-seeing eye.

The eye of Providence was part of the common cultural iconography of the 17th and 18th centuries. When placed in a triangle, the eye went beyond a general representation of God to a strongly Trinitarian statement. It was during this period that Masonic ritual and symbolism evolved, and it is not surprising that many symbols common to and understood by the general society made their way into Masonic ceremonies. Masons may have preferred the triangle because of the frequent use of the number 3 in their ceremonies: three degrees, three original grand masters, three principal officers, and so on. Eventually the all-seeing eye came to be used officially by Masons as a symbol for God, but this happened towards the end of the eighteenth century, after congress had adopted the seal.

A pyramid, whether incomplete or finished, however, has never been a Masonic symbol. It has no generally accepted symbolic meaning, except perhaps permanence or mystery. The combining of the eye of providence overlooking an unfinished pyramid is a uniquely American, not Masonic, icon, and must be interpreted as its designers intended. It has no Masonic context.

CONCLUSION

It’s hard to know what leads some to see Masonic conspiracies behind world events, but once that hypothesis is accepted, any jot and tittle can be misinterpreted as “evidence.” The Great Seal of the United States is a classic example of such a misinterpretation, and some Masons are as guilty of the exaggeration as many anti-Masons.
The Great Seal and Masonic symbolism grew out of the same cultural milieu. While the all-seeing eye had been popularized in Masonic designs of the late eighteenth century, it did not achieve any sort of official recognition until Webb’s 1797 Monitor. Whatever status the symbol may have had during the design of the Great Seal, it was not adopted or approved or endorsed by any Grand Lodge. The seal’s Eye of Providence and the Mason’s All-Seeing Eye each express Divine Omnipotence, but they are parallel uses of a shared icon, not a single symbol.

Note. This essay first appeared in The Short Bulletin for September 1995, published by the Masonic Service Association of North America, Silver Spring, Maryland. It is reproduced here by kind permission of the author.

(1) Robert Hieronimus, America’s Secret Destiny (Rochester, Vt.: Destiny Books, 1989), p. 48.

(2) Patterson and Dougall in Hieronimus, p. 48.

(3) Hieronimus, p. 81.

(4) Hieronimus, p. 51.

(5) Hieronimus, p. 57.

(6) C. Thomas and W. Barton in Hieronimus, p. 54.

(7) Thomas Smith Webb, The Freemasons Monitor or Illustrations of Masonry (Salem, Mass.: Cushing and Appleton, 1821), p. 66.

(8) Jeremy Ladd Cross, The True Masonic Chart or Hieroglyphic Monitor, 3rd ed. (New Haven, Conn.: By the Author, 1824), plate 22.
No photo description available.

01/03/2019

by Midnight Freemason Contributors Bro. Brian Schimian & Bro. Robert H. Johnson In the world of Masonry, there are many symbols wh...

12/30/2018
Illustrious Brother Dole giving a final salute to  #41!
12/06/2018

Illustrious Brother Dole giving a final salute to #41!

Illustrious Bro. Robert J. Dole, 33° SRM was made a member of Russell Lodge No. 177 in Russell, Kansas, in 1955. He was a member of the Scottish Rite and was honored as Supreme Temple Architect in 1997.

11/10/2018

THE ORIGIN OF THE THIRD OR MASTER MASON’S DEGREE – NEW EVIDENCE

As we are now all aware there are written records from Lodges in Scotland from as early as 1598 and there is evidence from non-Lodge sources there were Lodges functioning (but not recording anything in writing) as early as 1481. These Lodges were stonemasons’ lodges but their membership grew by adding non-operative as well as working stonemasons. By 1717 membership of Lodges in Scotland consisted of the three 'types' - entirely operative, mixed and entirely speculative.

In Masonic circles it is generally accepted that the third or Masters Mason’s degree was ‘invented’ in London, England, during the early part of the 1720’s. There are several reasons for this assumption. Firstly, in the ‘The Constitutions of the Free Masons’ published in London in 1723, makes reference to how the affairs of Grand Lodge are to be conducted. Article XIII (page 61) states: ‘Apprentices must be admitted Masters and Fellow-Crafts only here…’. This led many to believe that in addition to the [Entered] Apprentice degree there were two others that of Fellow Craft and Master Mason.

However as we know in Scotland from the earliest written rituals (Edinburgh Register House (1696), Airlie (1705) and Chetwode Crawley (c.1710) MSS)) the terms Fellow Craft and Master Mason were inter-changeable. In other words these were two terms for the same degree.

Because of the literal interpretation of the rather cryptic (some would say nonsensical) reference to Fellow Craft and Master Mason in 1723 it became ‘fact’ that there were three degrees of Freemasonry. The earlier Scottish rituals were not discovered until much later and could not therefore be used to correct this ‘fact’ that became embedded in Masonic knowledge.

To make matters worse the earliest reference to the conferral of a third degree was also said to have taken place in London in 1725 but not in a Lodge but in a musical society (‘Philo-Musicae et Architecturae Societas Appolloni’). The reference to the Fellow Craft and Master Mason’s was like the reference in the Constitutions of two earlier taken literally. One error (a ‘fact’) served to confirm the same error as ‘fact’. Masonic historians are now well aware that those errors but they have become so embedded in the lore of the Craft that they are repeated in the most knowledgeable and respected sources of the history of Freemasonry: Coil’s Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry re-printed as recently as 1996, is the supreme example.

What therefore are the ‘facts’ (not errors masquerading as facts!) regarding the Fellow Craft or Master’s degree. First and foremost we now know far more about the ritual used by stonemasons’ lodges before any Grand Lodge existed and as we know these rituals were all Scottish, all quite similar in content but unknown until relatively recently. The first of the three was not discovered until 1930 and the most recent, the Airlie MS was accidentally discovered a mere eight years ago. Attempting to use these recent documents to overturn almost 300 years of ‘fact’ is an uphill struggle. That said, the attempt should not be made and tonight I wish to bring to the attention of the brethren two pieces of evidence that ought, at the very least, cause every respectable Masonic historian to reconsider where and when the Master Mason’s degree originated.

The first piece of evidence is fair well know but I wish to ‘tease out’ the implications of the evidence in a way that has not been done before. The effect is I believe quite profound. This piece of evidence is to be found in the Minute Books of the Lodge of Dunbarton, No.18, (not a stonemasons’ Lodge but a recognisably modern Speculative Masonic Lodge. I will quote the entries in full:

‘At the meeting of the Lodge of Dunbritton the 29th day of January 1726 the which day there where present ‘John Hamilton, Grand Master, accompanied with seven Master Masons, six Fellows of Craft and three entered apprentices’

The Minute of the next meeting reads: ‘25th March 1726 – the said day Gabriel Porterfield by unanimous consent of the Masters admitted and received a Master of the Fraternity’.

Gabriel Porterfield was named in the Minute of 29 January a being a Fellow of Craft and on 25 March was admitted and received a Master of the Fraternity.

This clearly shows that in 1726 in Scotland there were three degrees being conferred within Lodges.

But there is a much greater implication just that irrefutable fact – an indisputable written fact and concerns the first Minute mentioned – 29 January 1726. I repeat it again:

‘At the meeting of the Lodge of Dunbritton the 29th day of January 1726 the which day there where present ‘John Hamilton, Grand Master, accompanied with seven Master Masons, six Fellows of Craft and three entered apprentices’

The enormous significance of this is that in January 1726 there were eight members of a Scottish Lodge who were in the possession of the Master Mason’s degree and that they conferred that degree on a Fellow of Craft.

Where, when and how these eight Scottish Freemasons received the Third Degree before it even existed in England is the intriguing part but sadly we are unlikely ever to know because the Minutes only commence at that time. Our best hope is that Minute Books of another, earlier, Lodge reveal to us that it had invented or developed the third degree.

It may strike you as strange to suggest that the third degree was invented or developed in SCOTLAND but there are two reasons why I can make such a claim. The first comes from the earliest rituals in the world, previously mentioned - ERH (1696), Airlie (1705) and CC (c.1710) MSS. At the very end of the Fellow Craft part of these rituals the candidate is asked:

Q ‘Are to a Fellow of Craft?’
A Yes

Q How many points of Fellowship are there?
A [The FPoF are given in reply.]

The FPoF were therefore an essential part of the second or Fellow of Craft degree – so important in fact that the candidate had to be able to repeat them exactly before he would be accepted a TRUE mason. Where do we find the FPOF today? In the third, or Master Mason’s, degree. Sometime between 1710 (and earlier) part of the Scottish second degree was removed and made part of the third or Master Mason’s degree.

I now come to an artefact, the importance of which has never been fully appreciated before now:

A large brass Square and Compasses (43.7 cm (17.2 inches) wide X (26.5 cm) 10.4 high and weighing almost one kilogramme)

Inscribed on the arms of the square is the following:

This square and compass was gifted to the Lodge of Lanark by (the text is interrupted by the insertion of an heraldic shield bearing three boards’ heads) Mr a monogram is engraved immediately after ‘Mr’ and the inscription continues ‘Brother to the Laird of Cleghorn’.

After consulting with the Lord Lyon he confirmed that there heraldic device and monogram are those of John Lockhart (born 13 January 1684, died 26 February 1766).

NOTE the words: This square and compass in other words it was presented to the Lodge a single piece ‘This’ Square and Compass.

However, there remain two more revealing things about this object. Firstly not that the points of the compass are jointed in such a way so that either point, can be concealed behind the arms of the square, or one (or other) point behind one arm of the square or that both points of the compass can be hidden behind both arms of the square. In other words this artefact can be used to position the points of the compass for any of the modern three degrees.

Why should I made such a fuss – simply because the artefact bears the date: 1714.

{NOTE: This is part of a presentation given in Lodge Sir Robert Moray, No.1641, on 5 February 2015 - Ed.]

Address

Logan, OH
43138

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Logan Masonic Temple posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Logan Masonic Temple:

Share