Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement

Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement Our mission is to enhance the civic life of our community by promoting engagement, preparedness, and advocacy.

We strive to create a platform for residents to connect, learn, and contribute to the betterment of Lake Park.

Congratulations to Roger Michaud Mayor Town of Lake Park Florida
03/11/2026

Congratulations to Roger Michaud Mayor Town of Lake Park Florida

Lake Park ELECTION: Great Article from Stet News
03/04/2026

Lake Park ELECTION: Great Article from Stet News

Race pits Lake Park Mayor Roger Michaud against challenger Ralph Moscoso in March 10 election.

Update: Great news! Wykeem was located. Please help find this young man
02/25/2026

Update: Great news! Wykeem was located.

Please help find this young man

Update: Great news. Wykeem was located.

The Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office is attempting to locate WYKEEM PHILLIPS. Phillips was last seen on February 23rd, 2026 in Lake Park, wearing a black jacket with white flowers print, red colored polo shirt and khaki pants. Phillips is labeled endangered due to being tender age (12yo).


Anyone with any information is urged to contact PBSO at 561-688-3400 or your closest law enforcement agency.

👉Lake Park: Marina Deal, New Lawsuit!Neighbors, a major story by Stet News about Lake Park just came out today — and it ...
02/21/2026

👉Lake Park: Marina Deal, New Lawsuit!
Neighbors, a major story by Stet News about Lake Park just came out today — and it deserves your attention.
Stet News published a detailed investigation about a new lawsuit filed over closed-door meetings connected to the Forest Development marina deal. The article also mentions our civic group, the Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement, for our ongoing transparency work.
Here is the link:
👉 https://stetnews.org/2026/02/20/resident-sues-lake-park-over-sunshine-law/
Even if you haven’t read it yet, here’s what you need to know:
⭐ What the article reveals
1. A resident lawsuit says several closed-door meetings may have violated Florida’s Sunshine Law.
These meetings shaped the 99-year Forest marina deal. Some were never recorded. Others happened after the legal authority to close them had expired.
And the most important reminder:
⭐ The Sunshine Law exists to protect us — the residents.
Regardless of anyone’s opinion about Forest or the marina deal, closed and unrecorded meetings are serious issues. Florida law is clear: the public must be able to see how decisions are made, especially when 99-year leases of public land are involved.
2. The resident who filed it is simply asking the court to determine whether the 2021 and 2022 closed sessions followed the law. That’s a reasonable request when the decisions affect generations of Lake Park residents.
3. Public officials should welcome clarity, not fear it.
The commission’s reaction was extremely tense — especially Commissioner Michael O’Rourke’s.
The article describes a meeting where:
He stepped down from the dais.
He attempted to fire the town attorney on the spot.
He clashed with the mayor, who had to pound the desk to stop the discussion.
And as the article notes, he publicly attacked nearly everyone involved —
residents, staff, the town manager, the attorney, and even his fellow commissioners.
Residents reading the article will naturally wonder why a commissioner would react this strongly to a request for transparency.
4. Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement was mentioned.
The article references our analysis of the proposed payment structure.
⭐ SACE is fighting this marina deal because we believe it is deeply unfavorable to the Town and effectively gives away our public marina.

⭐ Why all of this matters
You don’t need to be involved in town politics to understand two simple principles:
✔ Public land belongs to the public.
✔ Public decisions must be made in public.
The Sunshine Law isn’t a nuisance —
it’s the protection that ensures government serves all of us, not just a few behind closed doors.
⭐ What SACE will continue to do
Request and share public records with residents
Promote open government and accountability
Make complex issues simple and understandable
Encourage respectful civic engagement
Advocate for decisions that put Lake Park’s long-term health first
Lake Park is stronger when residents are informed and involved.
Sunshine makes that possible.
If you read the article or want a summary, feel free to comment — we’re always here to help bring clarity to what’s happening in our town.
— Lake Park SACE

Lawsuit over Sunshine Law ignites emotional debate in Lake Park; leads to attempt to fire Town Attorney Tom Baird.

🔥 Lake Park Deserves Better: Last Night’s Meeting Crossed a Line.Last night’s February 18th commission meeting was hard ...
02/20/2026

🔥 Lake Park Deserves Better: Last Night’s Meeting Crossed a Line.

Last night’s February 18th commission meeting was hard to watch. What we saw from Commissioner O’Rourke was not strong leadership – it was inappropriate, destabilizing, and harmful to Lake Park at a moment when we can least afford it.
We all know emotions are high with lawsuits pending and an election coming. But that’s exactly when we need our commissioners to be disciplined, factual, and focused on solutions – not personal attacks and conspiracy hints from the dais.
Examples of behavior that is NOT acceptable:
🔹 Trying to fire the town attorney on the fly
In the middle of an agenda item about adjusting litigation rates, Commissioner O’Rourke suddenly moved to terminate the town attorney’s contract – with no notice, no resolution language, and no agenda item. It received no second and died immediately. That’s not thoughtful governance; that’s a stunt.
🔹 Talking about active lawsuits in public after a legal warning
The town attorney clearly warned the commission not to discuss the Sunshine lawsuit or P3 litigation in open session, especially with the plaintiff in the room. O’Rourke kept going anyway, criticizing the town’s legal strategy and exposing weaknesses on the record. That doesn’t “protect the town” – it weakens our legal position and undermines our defense.
🔹 Viciously attacking the town manager without cause
The town manager barely spoke all night, and when he finally did, he simply asked for clarity, cooperation, and better communication. Despite that, O’Rourke went after him repeatedly — questioning his integrity, his motives, and his leadership without offering a single piece of evidence.
He blamed him for “taking over,” accused him of ruining the town financially, and painted him as part of some orchestrated scheme — all without facts.
Attacking staff personally, for no documented wrongdoing, is unprofessional and disrespectful to the people working every day to fix problems this town inherited long before they arrived.
🔹 Undermining staff with insinuations instead of facts
He publicly questioned the marina director’s motives and brought up his former employment to imply favoritism in slip assignments. He hinted at secret agendas but refused to put any concrete evidence on the record.
This is how conspiracy theories spread — not how responsible governance works.
🔹 Attacking colleagues instead of debating policy
Throughout the meeting, he suggested other commissioners “don’t know what’s going on,” “only talk to two people,” and “don’t look deeper into things.”
Disagreement is normal.
Disrespect is not.
Commissioners are elected to work together, not tear each other down on live TV.
🔹 Taking Forest Development’s side while the town is losing money
Staff explained clearly:
✔ The developer refused to honor their agreement.
✔ They will not install the required floating docks.
✔ They will not pay the rent they owe.
✔ Lake Park is losing $7,500 every month because those slips are unusable.
Despite this, O’Rourke argued against enforcing the agreement and repeatedly defended the developer’s position.
A commissioner should defend Lake Park taxpayers — not the party refusing to pay the town what it is owed.
🔹 Painting Lake Park as a “financial mess” without facts
Declaring that Lake Park is collapsing and that “our revenue is going down, our expenses are going up, and our downtown is dying,” — all while major development is literally underway and staff are actively correcting long-standing issues — is reckless unless accompanied by actual verified data and solutions.
It is fear-based messaging, not leadership.
A question Lake Park deserves to ask:
If Commissioner O’Rourke has so little respect for his colleagues, our staff, and the residents of Lake Park —
why is he still serving as our commissioner?
If someone openly dismisses, insults, and undermines the very people they work with and the community they represent, we must ask:
👉 Is he acting in Lake Park’s best interest, or only in the interest of his own anger and personal agenda?
At some point, continued disrespect toward staff, colleagues, and taxpayers is not “holding people accountable.”
It is a sign that someone no longer has the temperament or judgment required for public office.
Lake Park deserves better.
We deserve commissioners who:
Follow proper process
Protect the town’s legal position, not compromise it in public
Treat staff with professionalism and respect
Debate with facts, not accusations
Stand up for Lake Park’s financial interests
Work with the community, not against it
Lake Park can debate big issues. We can disagree passionately. But the behavior we witnessed on February 18th is not how you serve a community you claim to care about. Link to the meeting video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScCnd0FhnX8

02/11/2026

Attention Lake Park residents: Come and learn the true information about any crime in Lake Park and the work PBSO is doing to help minimize and respond to incidents. Also learn about how residents can participate in public safety by resident-driven programs. Super interesting information provided with lots of Q & A.

Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement, in collaboration with private Lake Park residents, is sharing...
02/06/2026

Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement, in collaboration with private Lake Park residents, is sharing the responses from the two mayoral candidates — Roger Michaud and Rafael Moscoso — to the questions collected from our community.
Read their full answers here: https://lakeparksace.org/resources

STET NEWS is doing a great job keeping all of us well informed!
01/31/2026

STET NEWS is doing a great job keeping all of us well informed!

Happy Tuesday and Happy New Year! Here’s to a great 2026. We’re so glad you’re here. For you today, the developer of the Nautilus condo project takes Lake Park to court, one more election decided without a single vote cast, nuclear energy firm sets up shop in Palm Beach County, Riviera Beach w...

Meet the Lake Park Mayoral Candidates!Community Voter Information for the March 10, 2026 Lake Park ElectionThe Lake Park...
01/30/2026

Meet the Lake Park Mayoral Candidates!
Community Voter Information for the March 10, 2026 Lake Park Election
The Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement (Lake Park SACE), in collaboration with independent Lake Park resident volunteers, has organized a nonpartisan civic initiative to encourage voter participation and support informed decision-making in the upcoming mayoral election on March 10, 2026.
In this election, Roger Michaud (nonpartisan) and Rafael “Ralph” Moscoso (nonpartisan) are candidates for Mayor of the Town of Lake Park.
To help residents learn more about the individuals seeking this office, both mayoral candidates have been sent written questions developed from topics identified by Lake Park residents as important to the community. Each candidate received the same set of questions and was given the opportunity to respond in their own words.
Voter information is intended to provide residents with details about each candidate’s qualifications, priorities and perspectives, and to assist voters as they prepare to cast their ballots.

Disclaimer: This voter information was prepared by the Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement (Lake Park SACE) in collaboration with independent Lake Park resident volunteers. Lake Park SACE and participating volunteers are strictly nonpartisan and do not endorse, oppose, or favor any candidate or political party. Both candidates were invited to participate and respond in the same timely manner.
Each question has a word limit for answers. No editing will be done when the answers are received, and they will be posted in their entirely on or about Feb 7 via a link to be shared at that time.
After you have reviewed the candidates’ responses please feel free to contact each campaign for further information.

If you are a resident of Lake Park please show up and let Town know what you want.
01/22/2026

If you are a resident of Lake Park please show up and let Town know what you want.

Calling all residents of the Town of Lake Park come out and let your voices be heard. See below for important information on the future of Bert Bostrom Park!

01/21/2026

HIGH RISES IN LAKE PARK
🚨 IMPORTANT — PLEASE READ BEFORE THE JANUARY 21 MEETING 🚨
On January 21 at 6:30 PM, a plan that will help the Commission decide how tall, how dense, and how crowded downtown Lake Park can become — for decades — will be presented to the Town Commission.
This plan is the Park Avenue Downtown District (PADD) study, prepared by Kimley-Horn, a national planning firm hired by the Town to recommend limits on building height, density, and development in downtown Lake Park.
What’s being presented is not the same plan residents saw earlier this year.
❗ WHAT CHANGED — AND WHY IT MATTERS
🔴 A NEW high-density sub-district was added
• Allows 60 dwelling units per acre
• Highest density Lake Park has ever seen
• This sub-district did not exist in the original draft
🔴 WAIVERS THAT ALLOW MUCH TALLER BUILDINGS
• The draft keeps and expands height and density waivers
• Parking floors are excluded from height limits
• Developers can receive extra stories through loosely defined “public benefits”
➡️ Result: what appears as “6–7 stories” on paper can become 13–16 story buildings in reality
🔴 NO UPDATED ANALYSIS
• Traffic, wastewater, parking, and infrastructure studies were done at 48 units per acre
• No new studies were done to support 60 units per acre + waivers
🔴 NOT DISCUSSED WITH RESIDENTS
• No additional public workshop
• No notice
• No opportunity for residents to review or respond
🔴 FAVORS LARGE DEVELOPERS
The waiver system requires large parcels, structured parking, and major capital — advantages only large developers have, not small property owners or historic buildings.
📣 WHAT WE ARE STATING AT THE MEETING
✔️ NO buildings taller than 6 stories
✔️ NO new high-density sub-district
✔️ Density capped at 48 dwelling units per acre
✔️ NO waivers that allow extra height or density
✔️ Any increase above 48 requires new traffic, wastewater, and infrastructure analysis
✔️ Protect Lake Park’s historic, small-scale downtown
🗓 MEETING DETAILS
🗓 January 21
⏰ 6:30 PM
📍 Town of Lake Park Town Hall
Kimley-Horn will present. Commissioners will be listening.
📢 Please share so neighbors understand that waivers — not just density — are what allow tall buildings.
💙 This decision will shape downtown Lake Park for decades.

Lake Park HIGH RISES are BACK!YOUR VOICES ARE BEING IGNORED — HERE’S WHAT’S IN THE NEW Proposed PADD CODE:For the last y...
01/18/2026

Lake Park HIGH RISES are BACK!
YOUR VOICES ARE BEING IGNORED — HERE’S WHAT’S IN THE NEW Proposed PADD CODE:
For the last year, Lake Park residents have been clear and consistent about what they want for our downtown:
Protect our small-town scale
No high-rises
No hidden height waivers
Respect historic character
Fix parking and traffic
Keep development compatible with our neighborhoods
But the newly released PADD zoning code amendments do not reflect those concerns.
In fact, many of the things residents opposed are now being written into the law itself.
Here are the key issues:
🚨 1. Residents asked for lower building heights
The new code would keep up to 12 stories — and still keeps height waivers.
With structured-parking exemptions, buildings can effectively reach 14–16 stories.
🚨 2. Residents opposed higher density
The code increases density to 60 units per acre in the Core — the highest in Lake Park’s history — with pathways for even more through waivers.
🚨 3. Residents asked for real compatibility with historic neighborhoods
The new code removes the “Inner District” transition and replaces it with a system that encourages larger lots, bigger buildings, and block consolidation, which erases the fine-grained, historic fabric of downtown.
🚨 4. Residents objected to parking problems
Instead of fixing parking, the code allows parking reductions and trade-offs that push more cars into neighborhoods.
🚨 5. The Planning Study warned about these risks
The original draft planning report clearly stated that:
high-rises threaten neighborhood compatibility,
height waivers should be removed,
and density increases were not supported by market analysis.
Yet the final code amendments move in the opposite direction.
⭐ Bottom Line
Residents gave strong, unified feedback.
The study documented those concerns.
But the actual zoning text — the legally binding part — does not reflect what the community asked for.
CALL FOR ACTION: SHOW UP AND SPEAK UP on Wednesday, January 21, 6:30 Town Hall.
We deserve a planning process that respects our voices, follows our Comprehensive Plan, and protects the character of Lake Park.
We will continue to advocate for a PADD code that honors the community’s vision — not one written around developer convenience.
You can find these documents here: https://meetings.municode.com/adaHtmlDocument/index...

Address

Lake Park, FL
33403

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Lake Park Society for the Advancement of Civic Engagement:

Share