08/20/2022
I just saw this in another group and thought it should be brought to the public's attention. They most certainly won't allow it to be posted in public forums as the council has individuals censoring those venues.
"Remember the Measure G tax increase they sold the voters on....warning that if they did not vote in favor of it that additional tax then police and fire services would be cut. Now I see Evans is using the same tactic to scare voters regarding the Short Term Rental vote. Does this Council ever tell the truth about anything? The following is the opposition statement residents put out against Measure G. Same arguments apply to the STVR issue. This is the ultimate tax and spend council:
The following official argument was submitted in opposition to the measure:[1]
The “tax and spend” culture in La Quinta needs to stop.After years of careless spending and irresponsible money management by our city and Council they are now asking taxpayers to cough up more money to bail them out of the mess they created, while they are holding onto substantial reserves. Over the last twenty years as a resident of La Quinta, I have seen:
All types of fees added to my property tax, utility and cable bills some of them city related.
Tax monies given away as business incentives or in the form of grants.
Sales tax and TOT rebates given to moneyed developers, and projects, to the detriment of our City finances.
Awarding no bid costly consulting contracts to well connected individuals, for projects the city could do.
Police, fire, and public employee salaries and benefits continuing to rise at alarming rates.
The city sank a large amount of RDA funds into the SilverRock Project a money losing project. We are stuck with a large bond repayment, covering the golf course loses plus other related costs, which this year took $543,000 from our “General Fund”.The City has developed no Plan B to reduce those costs.
The “Successor Agency” (RDA) has created a debt for the city of $350,000,000 which is repaid thru property taxes.
This tax increase proposition is not a “Special Tax” which would address real needs, but a tax that would be dumped into the “General Fund” to be spent by this Council as they see fit.
Approving this tax increase is like taking an Alka-Seltzer for your aching head when you need brain surgery.
We can VOTE NO to any new taxes and force change in our broken status quo system.[2]
Path to the ballot
This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the governing officials of La Quinta, California."