10/15/2026
When the attorneys walked away from Cause Number 22-2-09322-6 SEA, they believed they were leaving a pro se litigant isolated and stranded in a legal wilderness. They expected me, managing my affairs 2,000 miles away in Indianapolis, to look at the trial court's May 2023 dismissal with prejudice and just quietly fade into the background. They counted on the hyper-technical rules and administrative technicalities to exhaust my spirit. But they forgot that my journey is fueled by a relentless pursuit of justice, born on the day I faced unprovoked, racially charged hate from a metro driver behind the wheel on Route 7—an assault that left me with permanent spinal and knee injuries and a profound violation of my human dignity.
My experience has proven to me that an institutional roadblock is never a defeat; it is simply a divine setup for a higher level of advocacy.
For more than three long years, I maintained my spiritual condition daily, kept my receipts, and watched the calendar while the system let the clock run out on my case. In September 2026, when the trial court attempted to block me one last time by denying my petition for a status conference, the truth finally fractured their corporate shield. The lower court judge openly admitted on the record that my timely, hand-mailed 11-page Motion for a New Trial had been mislabeled as a mere "Letter" under Sub 45 and sat buried in a clerical blind spot, never coming to his attention. The superior court confessed its own failure and deferred my rights to the higher court. I didn't hesitate—I climbed. I drafted my own filings, bypassed their local defenses, and forced open the gates to the Court of Appeals by initializing Case Number 90284-9.
Today, looking directly at Page 4 of my Motion to Determine Appealability, I see the absolute manifestation of my strength and mastery over their system. I have woven an airtight legal trap that leaves the state's highest judges with no procedural escape hatch. By weaponizing RAP 2.4(b) alongside the binding Washington Supreme Court precedent of Fox v. Sunmaster Products, Inc., I have legally forced the entire history of my case—dating all the way back to those defective 2023 orders—out of the shadows and into the appellate spotlight. And through RAP 5.1(c) and RAP 2.3(b), I have turned the court's own clerical failures (Sub 37 and Sub 47) into devastating grounds for review, proving that the trial court completely departed from the accepted course of justice.
The ultimate validation of my advocacy is stamped on the live docket. Because I refused to be intimidated, King County was forced to completely change their strategy, substituting senior counsel and bringing in Heidi Joanne Jacobsen-Watts to face me in the higher court. They are no longer dealing with a forgotten claim; they are facing a methodical, precise appellate advocate who has completely codified his story into the permanent judicial record.
My hope is an unshakeable, living foundation. One day at a time, I am proving that an everyday independent creator can look a multi-million dollar government entity in the eye, conquer their rules, and turn a personal tragedy into a universal blueprint for digital justice and systemic accountability. I already have my master appellate portfolio ready, and this motion is my ultimate testament—proving that when you walk with absolute truth and faith, no corporate moat can stop the wheels of justice from turning.
