08/09/2024
Summary of Timeline Leading to Friends Dissolution
See supporting documentation details at
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UT2vbV2KKwBrFokfTIA6MErbxbB7X2J2?usp=sharing
Library personnel ignored the Friends’ program policy guidelines, leading the Friends to vote to address this with the Library Director and request prior approval of programs costing more than $400, acknowledgement for the Friends’ support and matching funds for the town for the upcoming fiscal year 2024-25.
Drusilla Carter, new library director, filed a complaint with the Department of Consumer Protection, using her personal email, and requesting her name be redacted. This action resulted in a “cease and desist” order, threatening civil and criminal penalties, sent to the Friends because, upon incorporation in 2004, were not properly advised that we needed a solicitation license to ask for book donations. This license was granted by DCP within two hours of opening the next business day after it was filed.
The Friends immediately cleared all their sales shelves of many heavy boxes of books.
The Library Director lied to a member of the Friends, denying responsibility for the complaint.
When the Library Director found out a Freedom of Information request was in progress, the Trustees were given a false excuse why the complaint was filed. She claimed to have searched the library to no avail for the Friends’ bylaws (located in the Friends room’s cabinet), and then inquired to DCP for them. DCP does not keep copies of corporate bylaws.
The Chairperson of the Library Trustees, Pat Ayars, asked the Library Director to send a letter to the Friends, but the letter was never sent, and not mentioned again by the Trustees again until July despite repeated inquiries by the Friends as to its fate. The Friends discovered many months later that Andy Teirney blocked sending this letter.
Four members of the Friends met on March 6 with Andy Tierney and Donna Lanza. Tierney states that “The library really hasn’t been my thing,” a dispiriting thought for volunteers.
Tierney promises to have another meeting, with the Friends and Library Director. No other meeting was ever held, despite being scheduled for March 25, April 8, and August 1. These meetings were all cancelled by town management. The Friends are left to wonder whether these meetings were ever requested with actual intent to meet since they had never even been given any terms.
Ongoing hostility of library management and harassment continued (e.g., opening bank statement, property thrown out, zero communication or hostile tones).
Andy Tierney and Board of Selectmen’s Peter Kasper management repeatedly state the town will require the Friends to sign MOA /MOU (contracts known as a Memorandum of Agreement or Understanding), seeking to make the Friends a library support group under the IRS code, and subject to town control of their money and speech. At the same time, Tierney claims to the State Library on 7/9 that “Never was it my intention or understanding that these (MOU’s) were
mandatory or could have some sort of repercussions if not entered.”
The Library Director falsely claimed at a Trustees meeting that the library will lose state funding if there is not a MOA/MOU.
The Friends vote to remain an independent charity, but ask the town representatives repeatedly what they want of the Friends, only to receive no response.
Despite the ongoing issues, the Friends vote to fully fund the annual Library “wishlist.”
Carter returns $13,768 to the town from her budget despite asking the Friends for materials funds.
Tierney gives the Friends an ultimatum by the Tierney regarding the memorandum – sign the formal document, which had not even been drawn up by the town, or leave.
The Friends bring the issue to Board of Selectmen.
The Friends are given an ultimatum by Board of Selectmen Chair Peter Kasper three times – sign the formal document (not drawn up) or leave.
The Friends receive a 7/25 email from a Freedom of Information request between Trustees Chairperson Pat Ayars and the Town Manager planning to seize control of all of the Friends’ funds, while at the same time claiming to try to set up a meeting. Ayars’ claim to the Friends funds (a “tidy sum” in her words) is in direct conflict with her email on 7/8 to the state that “Because the Friends are a voluntary group, the Town and the Library have no direct control over their activities. Their efforts are completely voluntary. The Friends cannot be forced to enter into a memorandum of understanding, to contribute funds or support programs, or even to present the Library in a positive light. Despite their anxieties, the Library cannot seize the money of the Friends. If the Friends dissolve as a charitable Section 501(c)(3) organization, under IRS regulations, must go to another Section 501(c)(3) organization. The Douglas Library is a municipal agency and is not a Section 501(c)(3) organization. If the Friends decide to limit or cease funding for the Library, it is the decision of the Friends.”
Facing such harassment and threats, the Friends vote to dissolve.